Catchpoint vs Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] comparison

"We really need the API monitoring, as well as client side session monitoring, the global synthetic monitoring, to track the availability of the systems from the customer side."

"The best feature in Catchpoint is the alert or the notification my company gets frequently, in particular, every five minutes. It's the notification you get whenever a respective market has an issue. There's also a dashboard in Catchpoint that shows the markets you support, so all the markets will be highlighted graphically in the dashboard whenever there's downtime that could affect you. If there's no issue for a specific market, it will be in green, so in this way, anybody would be able to understand which market has issues and which market has no issues through Catchpoint. The tool is very useful for monitoring activities."

"The most valuable features of Catchpoint are basically the transaction monitors on the API and UI."

"Catchpoint provides a great amount of information."

"The drill-down feature of this product was very good. It allowed us to identify the exact page or area of the site that was causing our customers an issue."

"The solution offers three different ways of slicing data to look for abnormalities."

"The thing I like most is the tech support in this company, because they have 24/7 chat support. We can chat immediately and ask them about an issue and they keep responding. They create tickets on our behalf and respond."

"Catchpoint's customer service and support are valuable."

"Having standard monitoring features and a central repository saves us a lot of time and reduces risk of incidents."

"Dell Foglight does analyze and optimize your virtual infrastructure. It definitely reduces operational cost."

"Real time database monitoring and alerting are valuable."

"The ability to track performance of an application or application suite over time is extremely valuable to our business partners and for our application development team with near real time results."

"Capacity on database and file servers. I found the algorithms to forecast growth and concerns particularly intuitive."

"The most valuable feature is drill-down monitoring, which shows us from one interface the transaction chain from the front end to back end."

"Infrastructure Monitoring and End User Monitoring are the product’s most valuable features to me."

"FxV is valuable as we can playback the session."

"A room for improvement in Catchpoint is that it lacks an automated page updating feature. My company receives all the alerts and notifications it needs, but the page doesn't update automatically. You need to manually refresh the page, so every five minutes you need to refresh it to see the most updated information. If there's an automated page refresh feature, that would help my company. It's a feature that Grafana has. The page auto-refreshes in Grafana, so you don't have to manually refresh the page. If that feature is implemented in Catchpoint, it'll be useful for the users. Another area for improvement in the tool is you have to do a manual task, for example, when you have a notification for a market, you get a zip code that the user could have entered, but if the zip code is incorrect, you have to manually go into Catchpoint and update that parameter, so that manual step is another area in the tool that needs improvement."

"There's still too much manual involvement in getting customized test configurations out there. It's good, but it still takes a lot of effort. In other words, it's when you need to configure it to collect a specific variable and that kind of thing."

"A large selection of nodes are available but it is a challenge to test reliably in China and the Middle East."

"It would be great if Catchpoint could incorporate its alerting system instead of relying on separate tools like ServiceNow."

"The old user version was better, it was more user-friendly."

"if we need to do performance analysis, we have to click too many times. For example, if there is an issue that is caught by Catchpoint, we need to understand what the error is and at which step it failed, or which transaction that is impacted. To drill down, we have to click too many things to get the answer."

"Catchpoint can be improved by focusing solely on network monitoring."

"The product could include global monitoring and predictive analytics to identify widespread issues and cyber threats."

"The “cartridge” concept for every little thing is a bit of a bother to implement."

"My only complaint from Foglight for monitoring is that you only get a plot for five minute average for metrics like CPU and Memory, on the application side I can see metrics more quickly at 15 seconds for metrics like active sessions, heap. I would like to see the same for CPU and memory."

"It needs a more intuitive way to create and implement custom "Cartridges" to be deployed through out a Federated environment."

"SQL agents often failed but again this may have been addressed in future versions."

"The version compatibility needs work."

"There are some metrics I'd like to track that are difficult to find or implement into a tracking solution without a lot of manual work."

"I want to see a new interface that contains HTML5 features. The current version of Foglight (on-premise edition) is so fusty in comparison with leaders of Gartner APM Quadrant - i.e. Appdynamics, NewRelic, Dynatrace."

"I want to see mobile access application in the next release."

"In terms of licensing fees, I believe they were slightly higher."

"The price and licensing are very, very high. They have to come down on the pricing to match with the industry standard."

"The solution's pricing is comparable to the last tool we were using."

"The solution's pricing varies based on services and licensing models."

"The pricing is based on consumption and works on a point scale. For example, let's say I want to look at www.google.com, and I'm going to test it to see if it's there. It will bring back all this data that tells me how long it took to connect and how long it took to get the first byte. It will list all the resources on the page, showing that they all work and there are no broken links. It brings that data back. That test has an assigned point value depending on what you decide to extract from that test. If all I do is check to see whether it's available, it might be one point. I don't know the exact point values off-hand. This is just an example."

"Foglight can be expensive I would go with the pricing at a three year deal."

"The price is expensive for us."

"I recall it being a very expensive solution relative to function and stability."

"Since the product split – the licensing is a bit more complex."