CDN77 vs Sucuri comparison

CDN77.com and Sucuri Security are both solutions in the Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection category. CDN77.com is ranked #32, while Sucuri Security is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.5. CDN77.com holds a 0.6% mindshare in DDOS, compared to Sucuri Security’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CDN77.com users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sucuri Security users who would recommend it.

CDN77

Read 3 CDN77 reviews

196 Views
162 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Sucuri

Read 6 Sucuri reviews

632 Views
457 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CDN77

Sucuri

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CDN77 and Sucuri based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed CDN77 vs. Sucuri Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

CDN77 vs. Sucuri

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 815,854 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

CDN77

Ranking in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection

32nd

Average Rating

10.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CDN (25th)

Sucuri

Ranking in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection

18th

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF) (22nd), Domain Name System (DNS) Security (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection category, the mindshare of CDN77 is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sucuri is 1.5%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection

Featured Reviews

it_user821400

Owner at a tech services company

Feb 20, 2018

The control panel is nicely laid out and I do not have to hunt for functionality

I manage about 25 websites, which have a lot of imagery. Most of the sites use WordPress I selected CDN77 because it has servers where our different target markets are (some are in Asia). It is extremely easy to set up and integrate with WordPress and purge files as needed through the control…

Read full review

David Shlingbaum

IT Development Manager, Architect, Developer at Miltel Communications LTD

May 3, 2023

Simple solution and good WAF

I use it as a WAF, which is basically a web firewall to monitor and block traffic to our web server. We wanted to have improved security for our not-so-new web server and also for newer technologies. If they can block using geolocation, it can analyze the URLs, and you can basically define folders…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is extremely easy to set up and integrate with WordPress and purge files as needed through the control panel."

"It has improved our organization by providing quick access to resources."

"Purge pages: It is a fast solution for updating my content from all datacenters."

"I selected CDN77 because it has servers where our different target markets are (some are in Asia)."

"It has helped improve load speed on the site."

"The control panel is nicely laid out and I do not have to hunt for functionality."

"Domain name scanning since it allows us to scan all our domain names and determine whether it has malware or if is reported as phishing."

"The most valuable part is the analytics and visualization."

"The initial setup was very easy."

"The initial setup was straightforward. Straight forward because the plugin can simply be installed and then it does its job. It's not complex, there is no learning curve. The online scan is simple, you put in the website address and the scan gives us a report on the browser itself. It's simple to use."

"It significantly eases the workload and streamlines the initial setup required to protect a website."

"I use it as a WAF, which is basically a web firewall to monitor and block traffic to our web server."

Cons

"A year ago, I had to deal with SEO factors involving duplication of content."

"If you are a low-use user and not used the minimum credit, it will be lost at end of year unless you upgrade, then you are left with more bandwidth than you can ever use."

"The main improvement I would like to see is support for .NET applications. If they could include this feature, I would include more sites in the protection."

"It would greatly benefit customers if they implemented an online chat or messaging system for quicker assistance."

"I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. The reason is that we have found sometimes customers or Google saying that there is something wrong with the website but Sucuri says that the site is clean so we do have to look at the site manually which means that the Sucuri scan does not pick up anything and everything."

"Sucuri could provide help for specific security alerts in-line instead of requiring users to search for it in the help section."

"Confident score: Currently it does not have one and there are cases that most websites flagged are false-positives."

"In terms of improvement, the cost factor is always there."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Regarding the pricing, it is expensive. It may not suit others. I suggest a lower recharge level and also to remove the credit expiry time."

"For low-use users, it can be more expensive than it seems. It would be a disadvantage for a lot of hobby users."

"I would suggest low usage cases that there are other options available, such as WordPress's own CDN."

"Sucuri offers different plans, both the standard plan and an advanced plan. So there are different plans to choose from."

"The ROI has been very good. Because of the solution, I have a tax break. The site developers were not always experienced people. We used to pay more for cleaning up the site when it was infected. Now, we have peace of mind knowing that the solution will clean up the site and that we won't have to go through the unnecessary process of restoring it from a backup. The protection on the WAF and the measures for backups have also prevented our site from going down."

"It stands out as a more cost-effective option compared to other cloud-based security services like Cloudflare or JetPass."

"I’d simply say it’s really worth it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Educational Organization

45%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Sucuri?

The initial setup was very easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sucuri?

The pricing is very reasonable. Sucuri offer other features as an add-on, such as backup, but these have an additional cost. We host the sites ourselves, so I don't take it because it was redundant.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sucuri?

The main improvement I would like to see is support for .NET applications. If they could include this feature, I would include more sites in the protection. In future releases, perhaps Sucuri could...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cloudflare vs CDN77

Compared 100% of the time

More CDN77 Competitors

Cloudflare vs Sucuri

Compared 42% of the time

AWS WAF vs Sucuri

Compared 23% of the time

SiteLock vs Sucuri

Compared 21% of the time

Imperva DDoS vs Sucuri

Compared 8% of the time

Comodo cWatch vs Sucuri

Compared 6% of the time

More Sucuri Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CDN

November 2024

Download CDN77 product report

Buyer's Guide

Sucuri

October 2024

Download Sucuri product report

Learn More

Video not available

CDN77.com

Sucuri Security

Overview

CDN77 is an innovation leading content delivery network provider with global coverage of 32+ PoPs on 5 continents.

CDN77 is a great solution for many use cases - website acceleration and security, live streaming, VOD, gaming, software distribution and private CDN.

Get a 14-day free trial with unlimited features and 24/7 live support. No credit card needed. Make your content delivery faster and more secure within 5 minutes.

Sucuri gives website owners peace of mind with solutions that prevent hackers from abusing websites, and professional response services to those compromised. Sucuri is dedicated to researching the latest and emerging threats affecting websites like yours. Website security should be attainable for all website owners; we focus on making that a reality. Get back to running awesome WordPress websites. Our services are built around three principles – People. Process. Technology.

Sample Customers

Hubble Space Telescope & European Southern Observatory, Oracle, Scania, CentOS, bet-at-home.com, Playrix, Epom Ad Server

The Loft Salon, Tom McFarlin, WPBeginner, Taylor Town, Everything Everywhere, Financial Ducks in a Row, Chubstr, Real Advice Gal, Sujan Patel, Wallao, List25, School the World

Buyer's Guide

CDN77 vs. Sucuri

October 2024

Free Report: CDN77 vs. Sucuri

Find out what your peers are saying about CDN77 vs. Sucuri and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CDN77 vs. Sucuri report.

See our list of best Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection vendors.

We monitor all Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.