Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Centreon vs EV Observe comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Centreon
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
21st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (25th), Cloud Monitoring Software (20th)
EV Observe
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
77th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
AIOps (24th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Centreon is 3.2%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of EV Observe is 0.3%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

Caulson Chua - PeerSpot reviewer
With fewer staff resources, we can identify and address issues before the system goes down
Centreon's most valuable features are preventative maintenance and cost-efficiency. Everything is monitored, and we get a log before the system fails. We have an opportunity to fix the issue and avoid downtime. The dashboard is user-friendly, and the solution provides good reporting and visibility. The layout is straightforward. You can click on the drop-down list to select the server you want. The anomaly detection feature helped us reduce our average resolution time by 30 minutes to an hour.
Use EV Observe?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
20%
Government
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Educational Organization
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Centreon?
Centreon's most valuable features are preventative maintenance and cost-efficiency. Everything is monitored, and we get a log before the system fails. We have an opportunity to fix the issue and av...
What needs improvement with Centreon?
The issue my company has with the tool stems from the fact that it didn't give an on-time response to us. The product collects the information, but it fails to send them via SMS, WhatsApp or Telegr...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Airbus, Bollore, BT, Canal Plus, Kuehne Nagel, Limagrain, LVMH, Oberthur Technologies, Orange, Darty, Addax Petroleum, Plastic Omnium, Auchan, Valeo, Saint Gobin, Clarins, Hugo Boss, JC Decaux, French Government (Defense, Justice, Environment, Agriculture), OptiComm, Thales, Zeiss.
1. BMW 2. BYD 3. Daimler 4. Ford 5. General Motors 6. Honda 7. Hyundai 8. Kia 9. Mercedes-Benz 10. Nissan 11. PSA Peugeot 12. Citroën 13. Renault 14. Toyota 15. Volkswagen 16. Volvo 17. Aptiv 18. Bosch 19. Continental 20. Delphi 21. ZF Friedrichshafen 22. ABB 23. Eaton 24. Infineon Technologies 25. Lear 26. Panasonic 27. Qualcomm 28. Valeo
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.