Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CFEngine Enterprise vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.6
Microsoft Intune support experiences vary, with premium users satisfied, others facing delays, and mixed effectiveness of support staff.
No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.8
Customer service for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is mixed, with both high praise and complaints about response times and complexity.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.4
Microsoft Intune faces challenges in reporting, cross-platform support, policy configurations, interface complexity, costs, and macOS management.
No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
5.7
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform needs improved UI, network support, modules, Windows integration, pricing, AI coding, and collaboration tools.
If my organization has sensitive data we don't want to leak, deploying the policies can present technical challenges and potential loopholes.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
Microsoft Intune is praised for its scalability and adaptability, supporting various organizational sizes with seamless device management.
No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.3
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is scalable, adaptable, and reliable for managing diverse system requirements in various enterprise sizes.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
7.5
Enterprises find Microsoft Intune competitively priced and cost-effective, especially when bundled with other Microsoft services in agreements.
No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.3
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform provides a cost-effective, open-source solution with flexible licensing and valuable support, despite some premium costs.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
Microsoft Intune is highly reliable, with minimal issues and high user satisfaction due to regular updates and strong infrastructure.
No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is highly rated for its stability, reliability, and performance, with issues typically user-related.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.0
Microsoft Intune excels with seamless Azure integration, strong security, centralized management, enhancing productivity and cost-effective remote device management.
No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.2
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform simplifies automation, enhances versatility, and reduces errors and deployment times with its user-friendly features.
Autopilot allows bulk enrollment of devices, making it easy for end users, even those without technical expertise, to use their devices immediately.
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Intune
Sponsored
Ranking in Configuration Management
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
210
Ranking in other categories
Remote Access (1st), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (1st), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (1st)
CFEngine Enterprise
Ranking in Configuration Management
24th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Red Hat Ansible Automation ...
Ranking in Configuration Management
1st
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
67
Ranking in other categories
Release Automation (3rd), Network Automation (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Configuration Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Intune is 11.8%, up from 10.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CFEngine Enterprise is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is 16.6%, up from 16.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Configuration Management
 

Featured Reviews

Gaurav Chandola - PeerSpot reviewer
We can manage all aspects of our devices from a single console, easy to scale, and quick to deploy
Intune has many benefits from the Microsoft perspective. This solution can manage Windows 10 devices, app management, and provide security solutions. We don't need to worry about our network connection, and we'll be more secure with regular security patches and compliance. Since everything will be deployed through the internet and users will log in using the internet only, the risks have been mitigated. Security updates, security patching, and the application will be targeted from Intune. The location tracker will be available to track where the device is and the user's location. The user will be restricted from accessing certain applications using compliance policies. Conditional access policies will be based on the reason why the user needs access to the application. Microsoft Intune is one of the best products in the industry for managing Windows devices. The solution has more feature restrictions. The conditional access policies also eliminate the dependency on the on-prem network for the devices. The solution also manages our security settings and a lot of other beneficial features such as Microsoft Purview which gives us the compliance portion. We can manage all aspects of our device from a single console, including M365 services. This allows us to configure data classification types, such as public, private, internal, confidential, and highly confidential.
Use CFEngine Enterprise?
Share your opinion
Muralitharan KS - PeerSpot reviewer
Efficient server management and detailed reporting with flexible deployment capabilities
We are primarily using Ansible for automation purposes as it is a configuration management tool. It is utilized for various activities such as DNS activity, changes to web servers, virtual host settings, and other day-to-day tasks, all of which are templated in Ansible Ansible allows us to manage…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Configuration Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
26%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Government
7%
No data available
Educational Organization
30%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How does Microsoft Intune compare with VMware Workspace One?
Microsoft Intune is a great tool for managing a mobile device fleet while keeping access control. The solution makes ...
What are the pros and cons of Microsoft Intune?
Microsoft Intune is a great configuration management tool and has a lot of good things going for it. Here are some of...
How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?
Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is the difference between Red Hat Satellite and Ansible?
Red Hat Satellite has proven to be a worthwhile investment for me. Both its patch management and license management h...
How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?
Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that ...
What do you like most about Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?
The most valuable features of the solution are automation and patching.
 

Also Known As

Intune, MS Intune, Microsoft Endpoint Manager
No data available
Ansible
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Mitchells and Buzzers, Callaway
Chevron, Deutsche Telekom, LinkedIn, US Navy, Samsung, Panasonic, DHL, Pfizer
HootSuite Media, Inc., Cloud Physics, Narrative, BinckBank
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Microsoft, HCLSoftware and others in Configuration Management. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.