Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs Radware Cloud WAF Service comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.0
Customer service for Check Point CloudGuard WAF is mixed, with both praise for effectiveness and criticism of response times.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
6.8
Check Point CloudGuard WAF needs cost efficiency, improved support, better integration, enhanced UI, and extended trial for effective evaluation.
No sentiment score available
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers excellent scalability and seamless integration, though potential latency issues arise with larger user bases.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
6.7
Check Point CloudGuard WAF is competitively priced with advanced features, but costs more than alternatives like FortiWeb and Azure WAF.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
9.0
Check Point CloudGuard WAF is praised for stability and reliability, despite minor issues like license downtime and configuration challenges.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.4
Check Point CloudGuard WAF provides scalable, high-performance security with automated threat detection, real-time monitoring, and seamless cloud integration.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point CloudGuard WAF
Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
14th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
8.0
Number of Reviews
34
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (10th)
Radware Cloud WAF Service
Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
12th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
8.4
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Ashish Upadhyay - PeerSpot reviewer
Automation capabilities also help streamline security processes and smooths down API integration processes and detects API availability
There is room for improvement in the pricing strategy. By reducing their cost and extending the trial period, Check Point can attract more partnerships and customers, keeping up with other vendors in the field. It has a trial period, but they can extend it so we can better evaluate how it's working in our environment and how well it is suited. It should be converted to activate some discounts on buying standard versions. This will attract more of us, and we'll get more time to check the application and how it works. Additionally, their effort to involve IT teams would mean continuous adaptation to meet business requirements. This can help with the price picture and increasing the trial period so we can better evaluate the cost-effectiveness. Also, Check Point need to continue developing new features and arrangements in line with changing business requirements. The analysis time while it analyzes itself is very time-consuming. They need to improve the latency and minimize the steps involved. Also, the documentation needs to be updated, more improved, and simplified... so that even a beginner can start with this application. It can make things more beginner-friendly. Also, Check Point can bring some updates to the integration features with other security solutions, making it easier to integrate. For instance, it needs to integrate with solutions someone might have various firewall solutions from IBM and others, depending on which ones the business wants to integrate with.
Gaurav-Mishra - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides features to monitor traffic and quickly identify potential issues but analytic dashboard could be improved
It's mostly for the Alteon service. The Alteon load balancing part, particularly the SSL offloading and WAF offloading, is crucial. Offloading allows us to monitor and identify issues easily. I believe the SSL offloading is the most valuable feature. It's easy to use, and the configurations are similar across different vendors. Compared to F5 and Citrix, Radware is easier to communicate with and use. The configuration process is simple, involving the creation of groups and pools, much like in F5. The SSL offloading is also very easy. Overall, I think it's a good solution. The service we use through the cloud is very easy. We have one dashboard to manage everything, which is convenient.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Security Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
18%
Retailer
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CloudGuard for Application Security?
The app control is very sensitive, and the threat detection and prevention is better than other Check Point solutions. There is a centralized management console for threat protection and self-inspe...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?
Pricing is average—not too expensive, yet not cheap either. CloudGuard offers bundled packages, which may reduce costs compared to paying for individual features as opposed to other providers.
What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?
Support could be improved, particularly in terms of availability. Although they provide 24/7 support, there are sometimes delays in delivering solutions. Advanced bot protection has recently been i...
What do you like most about Radware Cloud WAF Service?
One of the most valuable features we have found in the solution is protection against attacks from botnet networks and the requests that these remote networks can generate that are blocked from our...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Radware Cloud WAF Service?
I'm not a part of the purchasing team. I do not know about the costs or licensing.
What needs improvement with Radware Cloud WAF Service?
It needs a better reporting and dashboard to provide better insights.
 

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Orange España, Paschoalotto
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.