Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs Radware Cloud WAF Service comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.7
Businesses see financial benefits from Cloudflare through improved uptime, security, and performance, enhancing returns despite measurement challenges.
Sentiment score
8.1
Check Point CloudGuard WAF users experienced strong ROI through enhanced security, efficiency, reduced costs, and tool consolidation benefits.
Sentiment score
7.9
Radware Cloud WAF reduces risks, boosts ROI, cuts costs, enhances security, and improves reliability despite initial setup expenses.
You would only lose money if you had an attack and you need to calculate the cost against the risks.
WordPress security can be tricky, and that's where Cloudflare can be absolutely helpful for small businesses.
We have had ROI with the tool's use since it never gave us downtime and made us lose millions.
When you migrate to the cloud, it feels like saving 90% of your time.
Most of the operations happen in the background, so I do not spend much time on it.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.1
Customer service is highly rated, especially for Enterprise plans, but response times could improve for complex issues.
Sentiment score
7.3
Check Point CloudGuard WAF support has mixed reviews, praised for expertise but criticized for slow response and limited availability.
Sentiment score
7.5
Radware Cloud WAF Service support is responsive but inconsistent, with high ratings for critical issues and delays for complex queries.
This would help us address issues promptly, especially during unforeseen events like DDoS attacks.
We'd like a dedicated account manager.
You can get a support engineer with the best qualifications.
They need to increase the number of people for 24/7 support.
They were responsive even before we committed to buying their solution.
The customer service is very good.
The support provided by Radware's Emergency Response Team is excellent.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
Cloudflare is highly regarded for its scalability, smoothly accommodating various user needs and handling significant traffic across business sizes.
Sentiment score
8.5
Check Point CloudGuard WAF is highly scalable, flexible in licensing, and praised for adaptable performance in diverse environments.
Sentiment score
8.1
Radware Cloud WAF Service is praised for seamless scalability, accommodating demand and handling attacks without performance loss.
I would rate the solution's scalability a ten out of ten since I didn't encounter any issues with it.
I rate its scalability a ten out of ten because I had no issues with it.
I rate the scalability a ten out of ten.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Cloudflare is generally praised for stability and reliability, despite occasional issues and past outages, requiring proper configuration for best performance.
Sentiment score
8.2
Check Point CloudGuard WAF is stable, reliable, highly rated by users, with quick support resolution and minimal disruptions.
Sentiment score
8.0
Radware Cloud WAF Service is highly stable with minimal downtime, swift issue resolution, and consistently high user ratings.
For DDoS protection, I would not recommend Cloudflare.
I rate the solution’s stability an eight out of ten.
I rate Cloudflare eight out of 10 for stability.
It is very stable, never crashing or giving me an error that I can see.
I did not have any issues in the last three years during which I had more than ten critical services running on CloudGuard.
We run some of the agents on our data centers and never had any issues.
I have never encountered downtime, maintenance-related issues, or latency.
 

Room For Improvement

Users suggest Cloudflare improve analytics, CDN errors, support, DNS, APIs, pricing, server access, DDoS features, and documentation.
Check Point CloudGuard WAF needs cost efficiency, extended trial, improved support, better UI, threat detection, and IPv6 integration.
Radware Cloud WAF Service needs improved integration, documentation, threat detection, user interface, and cost-effective scalability for better user experience.
There's a need for improvement in areas like AI-based DDoS attacks and Layer 7 WAF features.
Despite these challenges, overall, Cloudflare remains the preferred solution compared to Azure, AWS CloudFront, and Google Cloud Armor.
Compared to other vendors and Cloudflare, there will be more downtime.
The provider could improve by providing better guidance and support during the configuration process.
Perhaps something between CloudGuard management and the virtual appliance on-site could be faster.
Integration with more technologies or Check Point products, or on-prem products, could improve robustness.
Improving dashboard capabilities to provide this information clearly for management is crucial.
 

Setup Cost

Cloudflare provides free and paid plans from $20, with straightforward pricing catering to small, medium, and enterprise businesses.
Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers advanced features and support but is seen as expensive by some smaller organizations.
Radware Cloud WAF Service offers competitive pricing, flexibility, and value, especially in managed contracts despite some additional costs.
That's where Cloudflare shines for smaller businesses – it's ten times cheaper than Akamai.
It is cheaper than other options.
It's cost-effective, but I think they should have a custom pricing model for enterprise customers based on the features you use.
It is a really good price considering the functionalities of the product and the price of the license.
Pricing and licensing are really expensive for this product.
The price is not as high compared to other options I have dealt with in the past.
 

Valuable Features

Cloudflare provides speed enhancement, security, and ease of use with CDN, DDoS protection, SSL, and traffic analytics for website optimization.
Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers scalable security, advanced threat detection, regulatory compliance support, and ease of use with customizable features.
Radware Cloud WAF Service delivers top-notch Layer 7 security, scalability, user-friendly features, and smooth integration for effective threat management.
Our scenario consisted of two web servers in different allocations to control access demands, and the load balancer did the job as expected, bringing security and stability to access points.
For me, the valuable feature is DDoS protection.
The most valuable features of the solution are performance and security.
Upon implementation and evaluation with third-party penetration testing, it meets rigorous security standards required for dealing with financial institutions.
It can protect against zero-day attacks and hidden anomalies.
The solution preemptively blocks zero-day attacks and detects hidden anomalies effectively.
Radware Cloud has significantly reduced attacks on our applications.
 

Categories and Ranking

Cloudflare
Sponsored
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
72
Ranking in other categories
CDN (1st), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (1st), Managed DNS (1st), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (14th)
Check Point CloudGuard WAF
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
39
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (11th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (14th)
Radware Cloud WAF Service
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
Web Application Firewall (WAF) (10th)
 

Featured Reviews

Spencer Malmad - PeerSpot reviewer
It's easy to set up because you point the DNS to it, and it's working in under 15 minutes
Cloudflare is highly scalable. Cloudflare is a system with a web portal that the end users like me see. It's a console where we can adjust the DNS, caching, and security features all in that console. Cloudflare owns thousands of servers across the world that cache the data. It's a powerful solution. When clients sign up for Cloudflare, they're getting this monster content delivery network, security, and a web application firewall in one. It's all rolled into one, and it's massive. Unless you have your website hosted on a massive hosting provider, there's no way that you can deliver the amount of data that Cloudflare can provide to the end users. If you have static content, there's no way that you can ever match what Cloudflare can do. Obviously, there are competitors to Cloudflare that do the same, but I'm saying other types of solutions. Let's say you go with F5. Great, that's on-prem. That's in your colo. You can't deliver as much data to the internet as you can with a CDN. You don't have to spend $20,000 on a net scaler, F5, or whatever Cisco's selling now. You don't have to buy that. You pay them $50 a month or $150 a month. It's totally worth it because even in five years, you'll never get the performance value, not just the actual ROI. You have to consider how much throughput you can get with Cloudflare.
Dialungana Malungo - PeerSpot reviewer
Protects our web applications and APIs and has a very low false positive rate
CloudGuard WAF is a very straightforward solution. I do not have to worry about signatures. Most of the solutions that are out there are mainly based on signatures, and I have to do a lot of maintenance to get the signature updates, and sometimes, due to a lack of resources, I am not able to do so. With CloudGuard WAF, I have peace of mind, because most of the features are AI-based, and there is not much configuration that needs to be done on my side. Once set, I only go to CloudGuard WAF to check. I do not have to worry about signatures or updates. Everything is done perfectly, and I have a sense of peace because I know our applications are safe. It is very important for us that CloudGuard WAF protects our applications against threats without relying on signatures. That is definitely one of the key features I need.
Mauro Arias Zambrana - PeerSpot reviewer
We benefit from improved security and visibility
Cloud WAF's management portal lacks many indicators, and the interface could be more user-friendly. It should provide more detailed information on events, possible solutions, and what each event means. While it does give you the event and block part, it doesn't give you a solution. Let's say, for example, someone wants to go into an SQL injection and find a possible solution other than the blocking part, there are no details. It would be good to have possible solutions or the ability to create an automated report to send to the developers in the portal. Also, they should offer more Spanish-language tutorial videos. There is only one tutorial in Spanish, which is difficult for us as Latin American customers.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
24%
Computer Software Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Security Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
17%
Retailer
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?
Cloudflare. We are moving from Akamai prolexic to Cloudflare. Cloudflare anycast network outperforms Akamai static GR...
Which would you choose - Cloudflare DNS or Quad9?
Cloudflare DNS is a very fast, very reliable public DNS resolver. It is an enterprise-grade authoritative DNS service...
What do you like most about Cloudflare?
Cloudflare offers CDN and DDoS protection. We have the front end, API, and database in how you structure applications.
What do you like most about CloudGuard for Application Security?
We have not had any incidents. We could realize its benefits immediately. We watched and monitored the traffic, and i...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?
The base solution costs approximately 30,000 euros, with an additional 2,000 euros per year for licenses and support....
What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?
The learning curve was a challenge due to initially incorrect configurations. It took approximately a month and a hal...
What do you like most about Radware Cloud WAF Service?
One of the most valuable features we have found in the solution is protection against attacks from botnet networks an...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Radware Cloud WAF Service?
I am not directly involved in pricing and setup cost discussions, but it seems that Radware offers a more cost-effect...
What needs improvement with Radware Cloud WAF Service?
Complexity of Setup and Configuration: Some users report that setting up Radware Cloud WAF can be somewhat complex, e...
 

Also Known As

Cloudflare DNS
Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Trusted by over 9,000,000 Internet Applications and APIs, including Nasdaq, Zendesk, Crunchbase, Steve Madden, OkCupid, Cisco, Quizlet, Discord and more.
Orange España, Paschoalotto
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.