Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.2
Check Point Harmony Endpoint users see fewer security incidents, reduced team size, improved compliance, and significant efficiency and cost benefits.
Sentiment score
8.5
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection improved security, reduced malware, streamlined IT operations, enhanced threat detection, and increased productivity for users.
The product is affordable and provides excellent coverage and protection across multiple platforms.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.9
Check Point Harmony Endpoint support is praised for responsiveness, but some note slow response times and limited communication methods.
Sentiment score
7.3
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection support is generally efficient and helpful, with high satisfaction despite occasional delays.
Only email support is available, leading to delays in getting assistance.
Their support was helpful enough for me to give them a seven out of ten.
Customer support is generally satisfactory but could be improved, especially in terms of response time.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.8
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is praised for easy scalability across environments, flexible adaptation, central management, and seamless operation.
Sentiment score
7.8
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is highly scalable, ideal for small to medium businesses, with challenges for larger enterprises.
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is scalable, suitable for both small and large companies.
It possesses high scalability because it is a SaaS solution from the cloud, allowing expansion as needed.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is praised for its reliability, easy implementation, and stable performance with minimal resource impact.
Sentiment score
8.3
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is highly rated for stability and consistent performance, making it a favored security choice.
The stability of the tool is high, as I have not experienced any downtime.
The stability of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is rated at ninety-five to ninety-seven percent.
 

Room For Improvement

Check Point Harmony Endpoint requires better Unix compatibility, improved integration, deployment ease, cost efficiency, intuitive UI, and security enhancements.
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection needs clearer communications, improved features, faster support, and enhanced resource efficiency and infrastructure.
Better technical support would enhance the product's competitiveness.
One area that requires improvement is the amount of audit logs the system can save, as it is currently limited to fourteen days.
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection could improve by extending its auto containment feature to Mac and Linux systems since it currently only supports Windows.
 

Setup Cost

Check Point Harmony Endpoint provides cost-effective, flexible licensing with robust security, appealing to both small and large enterprises.
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection's pricing is competitive yet varied, with differing user views on cost-effectiveness and additional charges.
It is not expensive and provides comprehensive coverage.
Pricing is a bit expensive but justified by the product’s features, capabilities, and scalability.
Pricing is competitive and considered average compared to other solutions.
 

Valuable Features

Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers robust features including anti-ransomware, threat prevention, easy deployment, and comprehensive endpoint security with centralized management.
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection offers strong security with sandboxing, AI threat detection, and seamless integration for efficient management.
Endpoint protection is valuable.
Harmony Endpoint has a geo policy that allows me to see where users log in from, enabling me to analyze if someone tries to access an account from another location.
It includes an auto containment feature, ensuring files and folders remain secure.
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Harmony Endpoint
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
6th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
8.0
Number of Reviews
112
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (9th)
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Pr...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
39th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Check Point Harmony Endpoint is 2.5%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Alejandro Flores. - PeerSpot reviewer
Good visibility with cloud centralized management and several layers of security
There are some "weak points" that have to be mentioned, including: 1) If the IT department is used to "cloning" endpoints (making images) you are going to have a hard time trying to install the product and you are going to end up reading a lot of Check Point documents. 2) If you are used to the granularity of roles features in Check Point Quantums products you are going to be a little bit disappointed. You can't set customized roles with customized read/write permissions. 3) You need a mature security team to manage this solution in order to get the most value from it.
CHATHURANGA-JAYAWEEEA - PeerSpot reviewer
Great features, good patch management, and useful ransomware protection
I also have experience with Sophos and Kaspersky. The main difference is that some features are not available in Kaspersky. And, for example, the patch management part is not included in Sophos. On the Kaspersky side, they have a patch management part. However, we need to purchase an additional option to enable that feature. With Comodo Protection, patch management is already included with the product, and we don't need to buy it separately. Also, the main advantage is performance. When we implemented Sophos on the endpoint, the CPU utilization went higher. When we installed Comodo, the memory of the CPU utilization is very low. We can implement Comodo from XP and SP3 to the latest operating system. However, with Kaspersky or Sophos, they are not supported for that or Windows 10. Comodo is supporting Windows XP SP3 and all our operating systems. That said, the Sophos Intercept X Advanced option has a web filtering part, or integration. Comodo has only basic filtering, and web filtering is there. That means we can do the URL web addresses and block and allow the connection and that's it with Comodo. Comodo does have a separate product for that, Comodo Secure Internet, where we can configure and filter all the web filtering parts. That would be an extra solution at an extra cost.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Government
8%
Computer Software Company
15%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Real Estate/Law Firm
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Check Point Harmony Endpoint?
The platform's most valuable features are the ability to build API, which meets our business requirements, and the VPN client, which provides VPN access from a single client.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point Harmony Endpoint?
The price for Check Point Harmony Endpoint ( /products/check-point-harmony-endpoint-reviews ) is good considering the services it offers. It is not expensive and provides comprehensive coverage.
What needs improvement with Check Point Harmony Endpoint?
One area that requires improvement is the amount of audit logs the system can save, as it is currently limited to fourteen days.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection?
Pricing is competitive and considered average compared to other solutions.
What needs improvement with Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection?
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection could improve by extending its auto containment feature to Mac and Linux systems since it currently only supports Windows. There is also room for improvement in ...
 

Also Known As

Check Point Endpoint Security, Endpoint Security, Check Point SandBlast Agent
Comodo AEP
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Boston Properties, Independence Care System, Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre (MCEC), Courtagen Life Sciences, Carmel Partners
Christian Motorcyclists Association, City of Thousand Oaks, City of Danville, HRI Properties
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.