Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs CrowdStrike Falcon comparison

Xcitium and CrowdStrike are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Xcitium is ranked #34 with an average rating of 8.6, while CrowdStrike is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.8. Xcitium holds a 0.3% mindshare in EPP, compared to CrowdStrike’s 10.8% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Xcitium users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of CrowdStrike users who would recommend it.

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Pr...

Read 15 Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection reviews

1,495 Views
906 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

CrowdStrike Falcon

Read 122 CrowdStrike Falcon reviews

31,872 Views
23,465 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Pr...

CrowdStrike Falcon

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

CrowdStrike Falcon and Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection compete in endpoint security. CrowdStrike Falcon has the upper hand in features and customer satisfaction, while Comodo is favored for its pricing and deployment flexibility.

Features: CrowdStrike Falcon offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities, AI-driven analytics, and robust integration with existing infrastructure. Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection features auto-containment technology, ease of use, and a comprehensive security suite.

Room for Improvement: CrowdStrike Falcon could enhance reporting capabilities and reduce false positives. Comodo requires better software updates, an improved management console, and overall performance optimization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CrowdStrike Falcon users report a smooth deployment process and responsive customer support. Comodo users find deployment straightforward but sometimes experience delays in customer service response.

Pricing and ROI: CrowdStrike Falcon is more expensive but is seen to provide a significant ROI through superior threat detection and prevention. Comodo is praised for affordability and value for money, appealing to cost-conscious buyers.

To learn more, read our detailed Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. CrowdStrike Falcon

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,763 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Pr...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

34th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

CrowdStrike Falcon

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

122

Ranking in other categories

Identity Management (IM) (5th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (2nd), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (1st), Active Directory Management (2nd), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (1st), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (1st), Ransomware Protection (1st), Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (3rd), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CrowdStrike Falcon is 10.8%, up from 9.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

CHATHURANGA-JAYAWEEEA

Product Security at Plexus Global (Pvt) Ltd

Nov 22, 2022

Great features, good patch management, and useful ransomware protection

I also have experience with Sophos and Kaspersky. The main difference is that some features are not available in Kaspersky. And, for example, the patch management part is not included in Sophos. On the Kaspersky side, they have a patch management part. However, we need to purchase an additional option to enable that feature. With Comodo Protection, patch management is already included with the product, and we don't need to buy it separately. Also, the main advantage is performance. When we implemented Sophos on the endpoint, the CPU utilization went higher. When we installed Comodo, the memory of the CPU utilization is very low. We can implement Comodo from XP and SP3 to the latest operating system. However, with Kaspersky or Sophos, they are not supported for that or Windows 10. Comodo is supporting Windows XP SP3 and all our operating systems. That said, the Sophos Intercept X Advanced option has a web filtering part, or integration. Comodo has only basic filtering, and web filtering is there. That means we can do the URL web addresses and block and allow the connection and that's it with Comodo. Comodo does have a separate product for that, Comodo Secure Internet, where we can configure and filter all the web filtering parts. That would be an extra solution at an extra cost.

Read full review

Chintan-Vyas

Associate Director at KPMG

May 29, 2022

Easy to set up with good behavior-based analysis but needs a single-click recovery option

Most organizations are currently looking for a scheduled scan to meet their compliance needs. Other players like Symantec and Trend Micro, FireEye, et cetera, are still providing the signature-based regular scheduled scans also, which is not available in CrowdStrike. That is one parameter that we feel should be there in CrowdStrike. CrowdStrike is only working on the dynamic or the files under execution. CrowdStrike is not scanning the static files. The product could be more accurate in terms of performance. We'd like to have a single-click recovery option. With some machines getting corrupted by malware, we need an easy way to start with a blank slate if things happen. That one feature should be there in the EDR.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the management of end-user machines."

"If you open up an application or a web browser, it puts a container in a sandbox area. So if there's some malicious code, it'll stick there. It also has way better protection for ransomware because it uses heuristics that are pretty effective. We've done a lot of tests with live malware, and it works really well."

"It's stable and reliable."

"It is a very stable solution, making it an excellent product."

"Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection allows our organization's clients to be managed and inventoried remotely."

"The product’s valuable feature is the remote control station."

"The big advantage is that it has a sandbox if something bad comes into it."

"They offer the whole package. Remote monitoring and management (RMM) is included with it, which is pretty nice. They also have Windows patching and third-party patching. It was easy to use for protection. The containment engine was pretty nice for securing our environment."

More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection pros

"The features I like the most are the response time and the dashboard are both excellent."

"I like the detection rates of mobile threats."

"The most valuable feature is the machine learning that they use to check certain patterns in the endpoint devices. It checks the whole ecosystem or entire environment."

"The most valuable feature of CrowdStrike Falcon is its accuracy."

"CrowdStrike enables the infrastructure managers to visualize all the events and get information about the network."

"The most useful feature is that we do not need to install or keep signature files. Regular scanning that consumes a lot of computer resources is not needed."

"It provides very good protection and the ability to crosscheck environments."

"It is an easy product to deploy."

More CrowdStrike Falcon pros

Cons

"The solution's online documentation needs to be fine-tuned. It is not up to which solution currently has. There is some inconsistency in the knowledge present. I would like to see MDM in the solution's future releases."

"Their support is not very good because they are very late to reply."

"They need to just modernize the infrastructure with something that is next-generation. We have recently moved to SentinelOne. It had been doing good for us for a while, but we needed something modern with new technology."

"Would be good to have a better understanding of what it is that you've got in quarantine."

"The quality of the analysis and the product dashboard is a bit low compared to other providers."

"They need to enhance the performance of the agents. Currently, the performance is going low when the agent starts a full scan. The agent is consuming a lot of resources while scanning. When there are a lot of documents to check, it slows down the endpoint. This is the only thing that worries me about Comodo, but this issue is also there in other products. It is missing DLP, and I know that they are working on adding some data loss prevention capabilities. They have added some capabilities, but these capabilities are not yet mature. I hope they will enhance these capabilities because it is important to prevent the data from going out from inside. We are protected from the outside, but we also have to be protected from the inside out."

"There could be MDRM features added to the product."

"There are a few minor issues such as package updates and passwords."

More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection cons

"CrowdStrike Suites and the way that it bundles things can be a bit challenging. It should be easier to integrate with the other stuff that they sell or be included with what they sell. We have one piece, then they are talking about another piece on vulnerability management all of the sudden, and we don't own that piece. We can see it in the console, but nothing shows up. It simply appears within the tool as an option, but we can't use it without purchasing it."

"Crowdstrike Falcon XDR can improve the integration. There are some locks on the cloud to on-premise integrations."

"I think there's an opportunity to enhance the AI or at least the traps to say, if something changes from this baseline, let us know and flag it."

"The console is not user-friendly or visually appealing and has room for improvement."

"Enhancements in reporting and forensic analysis could benefit the product."

"The installation process for this software needs to be simplified."

"We would like to be able to perform on-demand scanning, rather than relying on the scheduler."

"There are some aspects of the UI that could use some improvement, e.g., working in groups. I build a group, then I have to manually assign prevention policies, update policies, etc., but there is no function to copy that group. So, if I wanted to make a subgroup for troubleshooting or divide workstations into groups of laptops and desktops, then I have to manually build a brand new group. I can't just copy a build from one to another. Additionally, in order to do any work within a group, I have to first do the work on the respective prevention policy page or individual policy page, then remove the group if the group is assigned to a different prevention policy, remove the prevention policy, and then add the new one in. So, it can get a little hectic. It would be easier if I could add and remove things from the group page rather than having to go into the policy pages to do it."

More CrowdStrike Falcon cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the pricing a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive. The product can be considered fairly cheap."

"It's a cost-effective solution"

"It was about 35 or 40 bucks per year for the endpoint."

"Generally, the cost is between $16 and $19 per endpoint."

"Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is inexpensive."

"The product is very reasonably priced."

"I rate Comodo’s pricing a four out of ten."

"The tool's pricing is not very expensive and falls within the market price. The solution's licensing is on a yearly basis."

More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection pricing and cost advice

"The solution isn't very costly; it's affordable."

"I would like them to further reduce the price, because it is quite pricey at the moment."

"The pricing is definitely high but you get what you pay for, and it's not so high that it prices itself out of the market."

"It's an expensive solution but you get a very good product for the price. Compared to other products, SentinelOne is definitely cheaper and the Microsoft E5 package is probably more expensive. Not many companies are willing to purchase CrowdStrike Falcon in Turkey due to the cost, but the market is changing."

"Pricing and licensing seem to be in line with what they offer. We are a smaller organization, so pricing is important. Obviously, we would make a business case if it is something we really needed or felt that we needed. So, the pricing is in line with what we are getting from a product standpoint."

"I do not have experience with the cost or licensing of the product."

"The price is high in comparison to similar brands."

"The tool is a little bit expensive compared to other products, but I think it's okay owing to its quality."

More CrowdStrike Falcon pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Real Estate/Law Firm

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection?

Auto Containment is a valuable feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection?

It's a cost-effective solution. I would rate the pricing a nine out of ten. Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is one of the best endpoint protection solutions for enterprises.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection?

The locking and backup capabilities of the solution can be improved. The vendor can improve the DLP offerings. The solution provider should work on localizing the GDPR regulations, which Microsoft ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions that are very scalable, secure, and user-friendly. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto offers ...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with Darktrace?

Both of these products perform similarly and have many outstanding attributes. CrowdStrike Falcon offers an amazing user interface that makes setup easy and seamless. CrowdStrike Falcon offers a cl...

See all answers

How does Microsoft Defender for Endpoint compare with Crowdstrike Falcon?

The CrowdStrike solution delivers a lot of information about incidents. It has a very light sensor that will never push your machine hardware to "test", you don't have the usual "scan now" feature ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

Compared 25% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

Compared 12% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

Compared 10% of the time

Intercept X Endpoint vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

Compared 10% of the time

Fortinet FortiClient vs Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

Compared 9% of the time

More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection Competitors

Microsoft Defender XDR vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 5% of the time

Darktrace vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 5% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 3% of the time

More CrowdStrike Falcon Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection

November 2024

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection report

Download Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection product report

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Falcon

November 2024

Download CrowdStrike Falcon product report

Also Known As

Comodo AEP

CrowdStrike Falcon, CrowdStrike Falcon XDR, CrowdStrike Falcon Threat Intelligence, CrowdStrike Identity Protection, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface

Learn More

Xcitium

CrowdStrike

Overview

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP) delivers patent-pending auto-containment, where unknown executables and other files that request runtime privileges are automatically run in a virtual contain that does not have access to the host system's resources or user data.

CrowdStrike Falcon provides endpoint protection and threat intelligence using a cloud-based platform for real-time detection and response. Its minimal impact on system performance and ease of deployment are key benefits along with advanced logging and reporting for compliance and forensic analysis.

CrowdStrike Falcon is known for its efficacy in identifying malware, ransomware, and sophisticated cyber threats. The platform's cloud-native architecture and advanced AI capabilities ensure comprehensive endpoint visibility and rapid response times. Users appreciate the lightweight agent and seamless deployment process, along with detailed reporting features. Integration with security tools and efficient customer support are essential features, although some users highlight high pricing, occasional detection delays, and challenges with integration. Frequent alerts and the mobile app's performance are areas for improvement.

What are the key features of CrowdStrike Falcon?

Real-time Threat Detection: Provides immediate threat identification and response.
Lightweight Agent: Minimal impact on system performance.
Cloud-native Architecture: Ensures flexibility and scalability.
Advanced AI Capabilities: Enhances threat detection and prevention.
Comprehensive Endpoint Visibility: Complete insight into endpoint activities.
Detailed Reporting: Facilitates compliance and forensic analysis.
Security Tool Integration: Seamless integration with other tools.
Efficient Customer Support: Robust support services.

What are the benefits or ROI of CrowdStrike Falcon?

Improved Threat Detection: Identifies sophisticated threats, reducing risk.
Enhanced System Performance: Lightweight agent ensures minimal disruption.
Faster Response Times: Swift reaction to incidents minimizes damage.
Better Compliance: Detailed logs meet regulatory requirements.
Streamlined Deployment: Easy to implement with minimal downtime.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and retail, CrowdStrike Falcon is often used for critical security due to its robust threat detection capabilities. Financial firms value its rapid response and detailed reporting for compliance, while healthcare providers appreciate the minimal system performance impact. Retailers benefit from its comprehensive endpoint visibility and integration with other security tools.

Sample Customers

Christian Motorcyclists Association, City of Thousand Oaks, City of Danville, HRI Properties

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. CrowdStrike Falcon

October 2024

Free Report: Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. CrowdStrike Falcon

Find out what your peers are saying about Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. CrowdStrike Falcon and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. CrowdStrike Falcon report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.