Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Pr...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
34th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Kaspersky Endpoint Security...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
8th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
120
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Compliance (2nd), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (10th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is 3.7%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

CHATHURANGA-JAYAWEEEA - PeerSpot reviewer
Great features, good patch management, and useful ransomware protection
I also have experience with Sophos and Kaspersky. The main difference is that some features are not available in Kaspersky. And, for example, the patch management part is not included in Sophos. On the Kaspersky side, they have a patch management part. However, we need to purchase an additional option to enable that feature. With Comodo Protection, patch management is already included with the product, and we don't need to buy it separately. Also, the main advantage is performance. When we implemented Sophos on the endpoint, the CPU utilization went higher. When we installed Comodo, the memory of the CPU utilization is very low. We can implement Comodo from XP and SP3 to the latest operating system. However, with Kaspersky or Sophos, they are not supported for that or Windows 10. Comodo is supporting Windows XP SP3 and all our operating systems. That said, the Sophos Intercept X Advanced option has a web filtering part, or integration. Comodo has only basic filtering, and web filtering is there. That means we can do the URL web addresses and block and allow the connection and that's it with Comodo. Comodo does have a separate product for that, Comodo Secure Internet, where we can configure and filter all the web filtering parts. That would be an extra solution at an extra cost.
Karim Mostafa - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to setup, stable and good security use cases
I primarily use this solution for security.  I appreciate the good control it offers, which simplifies management. So, I feel confident using this solution. We need a more complete Mobile Device Management (MDM) system. I have been using Kaspersky for eight years. I use the latest version.  I…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It's user-friendly, compatible, and accessible."
"The tool is an open-source EDR with antivirus features. It also has remote support and patch management."
"It really protects and does its job. It totally blocked every attack attempt, and no attack attempt was successful."
"Containment is the best feature of the solution."
"They offer the whole package. Remote monitoring and management (RMM) is included with it, which is pretty nice. They also have Windows patching and third-party patching. It was easy to use for protection. The containment engine was pretty nice for securing our environment."
"It is a very stable solution, making it an excellent product."
"If you open up an application or a web browser, it puts a container in a sandbox area. So if there's some malicious code, it'll stick there. It also has way better protection for ransomware because it uses heuristics that are pretty effective. We've done a lot of tests with live malware, and it works really well."
"Overall, I would rate Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection a nine out of ten."
"The interface is friendly."
"The user interface is easy to maintain once it is setup."
"It integrates well across different operating systems, including mobile devices like Android and Mac. It effectively manages firewalls, particularly with Fortinet, enhancing overall security posture."
"The signature update is done securely."
"We used to have a lot of phishing attacks and all these kind of things for end-users so we decided that we needed endpoint security. We evaluated some solutions and found that Kaspersky is the most appropriate in terms of endpoint security and the speed of the user machine. The encryption is a major factor from our end."
"We swtiched to Kaspersky Endpoint Security because we found our previous solution did not meet our requirements."
"The solution is scalable, we have 500 users using this solution."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that the application control is very good."
 

Cons

"The product must provide a web filter to block websites based on specific categories."
"Their support is not very good because they are very late to reply."
"The solution's online documentation needs to be fine-tuned. It is not up to which solution currently has. There is some inconsistency in the knowledge present. I would like to see MDM in the solution's future releases."
"The menu could be cleaned up."
"We'd like the solution to include advanced web filtering capabilities, similar to what Sophos offers."
"The locking and backup capabilities of the solution can be improved."
"There could be MDRM features added to the product."
"Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection could improve by extending its auto containment feature to Mac and Linux systems since it currently only supports Windows."
"Kaspersky and most other security products have a lot of modules. They recently added several new ones. You find yourself buying and deploying so many things. There are some modules that everyone uses, like, for example, the orchestration module. Instead of selling them separately, it would be better to have bundles or an all-in-one license."
"The licensing fees could be reduced."
"We have zero-day detection of malware but it cannot detect other types of unknown intrusions."
"I would like to see machine learning and AI as added features."
"I think it would be good for them to consider and cloud integration capabilities."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business needs an easier mechanism for updates."
"It should be more secure and detect new malware as it's released."
"There have been some performance issues. They provide good security, but this slows down the performance of machines' servers. The software is not updating as frequently as we need."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Generally, the cost is between $16 and $19 per endpoint."
"It's a cost-effective solution"
"It was about 35 or 40 bucks per year for the endpoint."
"The tool's pricing is not very expensive and falls within the market price. The solution's licensing is on a yearly basis."
"The price of this product should be lower."
"I rate the pricing a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive. The product can be considered fairly cheap."
"I rate Comodo’s pricing a four out of ten."
"Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is inexpensive."
"The solution requires a license and there are different license packages depending on the number of users you need."
"The licensing is based per agent. You can get discounts if you have more agents."
"We pay for licensing yearly."
"For 300 nodes, we pay about 15,000 Malaysian Ringgit ($3,500 USD)."
"The price of the solution is reasonable. It is less costly compared to competitors."
"I received a very good deal with Kaspersky."
"There is an annual license required to use Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business."
"Licensing fees are paid annually."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
829,541 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Answers from the Community

EA
Nov 29, 2021
Nov 29, 2021
SentinelOne
See 2 answers
EG
Nov 23, 2021
SentinelOne
EB
Nov 29, 2021
Hi @BobenGeorge, @Kirtikumar Patel ​and @Basil Dange? Do you have any professional insights to share with your peers?
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Construction Company
8%
Educational Organization
61%
Computer Software Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
3%
Comms Service Provider
3%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection?
Pricing is competitive and considered average compared to other solutions.
What needs improvement with Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection?
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection could improve by extending its auto containment feature to Mac and Linux systems since it currently only supports Windows. There is also room for improvement in ...
What needs improvement with Kaspersky Endpoint Security?
I have some PCs with one gigabyte of RAM, and it's not easy to set up Kaspersky on these. Additionally, I want to improve how viruses are isolated and receive better notifications.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business?
The pricing of Kaspersky is good, and I rate it an eight out of ten. Our current licensing costs are one hundred dollars per user for three hundred users, which was established three years ago.
 

Also Known As

Comodo AEP
Kaspersky Work Space Security, Kaspersky Endpoint Security
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Christian Motorcyclists Association, City of Thousand Oaks, City of Danville, HRI Properties
ACMS, Arqiva, Pakistan International Airlines, RAO UES
Find out what your peers are saying about Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
829,541 professionals have used our research since 2012.