Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint comparison

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint are leading products in endpoint security. User reviews indicate that Microsoft Defender for Endpoint generally offers superior overall value, though Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection excels in several key areas.

Features: Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is praised for its Auto-Containment and threat detection capabilities, providing robust security layers. It also offers excellent malware protection. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is favored for its seamless integration with other Microsoft services and advanced threat analytics, in addition to providing real-time monitoring and automated investigation.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection needs enhancements in reporting capabilities and user experience consistency, along with better support for non-Windows environments. For Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, feedback often points to the need for better cross-platform support and reduction in false positives, along with improved customizability for enterprise applications.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is generally straightforward to deploy, though some users face issues with initial setup complexities. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is seen as having smoother deployment processes and better integration support. Customer service for both products is well-regarded; however, Microsoft's support is noted for its faster response times and more knowledgeable assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Users find Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection to be cost-effective with a good return on investment but highlight varying costs based on service levels. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is seen as more expensive, but users feel the pricing is justified by the comprehensive features and integration capabilities, leading to better overall value.