Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint are leading products in endpoint security. User reviews indicate that Microsoft Defender for Endpoint generally offers superior overall value, though Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection excels in several key areas.
Features: Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is praised for its Auto-Containment and threat detection capabilities, providing robust security layers. It also offers excellent malware protection. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is favored for its seamless integration with other Microsoft services and advanced threat analytics, in addition to providing real-time monitoring and automated investigation.
Room for Improvement: Users suggest Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection needs enhancements in reporting capabilities and user experience consistency, along with better support for non-Windows environments. For Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, feedback often points to the need for better cross-platform support and reduction in false positives, along with improved customizability for enterprise applications.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is generally straightforward to deploy, though some users face issues with initial setup complexities. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is seen as having smoother deployment processes and better integration support. Customer service for both products is well-regarded; however, Microsoft's support is noted for its faster response times and more knowledgeable assistance.
Pricing and ROI: Users find Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection to be cost-effective with a good return on investment but highlight varying costs based on service levels. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is seen as more expensive, but users feel the pricing is justified by the comprehensive features and integration capabilities, leading to better overall value.
The return on investment is primarily in time savings and better observability of what's happening.
Customer support is generally satisfactory but could be improved, especially in terms of response time.
Due to our size, we don't have access to direct technical support, but the knowledge base, Microsoft Learn, and the articles available are really good.
I rate Microsoft support 10 out of 10.
The level-one support seems disconnected from subject matter experts.
We managed to scale it out in a short amount of time, with two months of planning and three months of implementation on 10,000 computers.
It's pretty easy to scale with Microsoft, as they make it easy if you look into the documentation.
Defender's scalability is phenomenal, and it's going to be one of the keys to resolving issues for the SOC.
The stability of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is rated at ninety-five to ninety-seven percent.
Defender for Endpoint is extremely stable.
I haven't seen any outages with Microsoft.
I rate Defender 10 out of 10 for stability.
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection could improve by extending its auto containment feature to Mac and Linux systems since it currently only supports Windows.
Repeated interactions are necessary due to Level One's lack of tools and knowledge, hindering efficient problem-solving and negatively impacting our experience with Microsoft support.
We have multiple endpoints, and we want to look for signals across tenants.
An additional feature that could be included in the next release is free Copilot.
Pricing is competitive and considered average compared to other solutions.
Given our extensive Microsoft licensing, transitioning to Defender for Endpoint did not affect licensing costs.
The pricing, setup, and licensing were very easy and simple.
It includes an auto containment feature, ensuring files and folders remain secure.
Defender for Endpoint's coverage across different platforms in our environment is pretty good. We have devices running Linux, Mac OS, Windows, iOS, and Android. It covers all of them.
Attack surface reduction and limiting attack surface vectors are valuable features.
Web filtering is the most valuable feature of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint because it effectively maintains security for website access.
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection (AEP) delivers patent-pending auto-containment, where unknown executables and other files that request runtime privileges are automatically run in a virtual contain that does not have access to the host system's resources or user data.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a comprehensive security solution that provides advanced threat protection for organizations. It offers real-time protection against various types of cyber threats, including malware, viruses, ransomware, and phishing attacks.
With its powerful machine-learning capabilities, it can detect and block sophisticated attacks before they can cause any harm. The solution also includes endpoint detection and response (EDR) capabilities, allowing organizations to quickly investigate and respond to security incidents. It provides detailed insights into the attack timeline, enabling security teams to understand the scope and impact of an incident.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint also offers proactive threat hunting, allowing organizations to proactively search for and identify potential threats within their network. It integrates seamlessly with other Microsoft security solutions, such as Microsoft Defender XDR, to provide a unified and holistic security approach. With its centralized management console, organizations can easily deploy, configure, and monitor the security solution across their entire network.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a robust and scalable security solution that helps organizations protect their endpoints and data from evolving cyber threats.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.