Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point Security Management vs Cyware Cyber Fusion comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Security Manage...
Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)
3rd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
89
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (10th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (10th)
Cyware Cyber Fusion
Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)
27th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (22nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) category, the mindshare of Check Point Security Management is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cyware Cyber Fusion is 1.4%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Check Point Security Management0.5%
Cyware Cyber Fusion1.4%
Other98.1%
Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)
 

Featured Reviews

RL
TI at a security firm with 51-200 employees
Simplified threat detection and reduced policy deployment time
The standout features of Check Point Security Management are unified policy management, real-time visibility, and automation capabilities, making it a powerful tool for security management. Consistency across environments with Check Point Security Management helps me ensure that instead of maintaining separate rules for firewalls, cloud workloads, and data centers, we apply one unified policy that covers them all. This reduces misconfigurations and ensures compliance, proving to be a time-saver because rolling out a new rule or updating an existing one takes minutes, not hours, because it is propagated everywhere automatically. Automation is one of the most valuable aspects of Check Point Security Management, and it often does not get enough attention compared to headline features like unified policies or visibility. With policy automation, routine tasks such as rule creation, compliance checks, or policy updates can be automated, reducing human error and saving hours of manual work. Check Point Security Management has simplified administration in my organization because instead of juggling multiple consoles, everything is managed from a single pane of glass. This has reduced complexity and saved significant time for our IT team, improving our operational efficiency. For a policy update, I used to spend two or three hours across multiple consoles. Now, with unified management in Check Point Security Management, it takes thirty to forty minutes, resulting in about a seventy percent reduction in effort, greatly boosting productivity.
reviewer2342886 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of Cyber Security APAC at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees
The threat emails are not tailored to our company, though the product is stable
The threat emails are not tailored to our company. It just gives us every newsletter and bombards our email box. The solution must be able to provide threat feeds. We shouldn’t have to rely on third parties and pay for additional licenses. The tool doesn't integrate well with ServiceNow. It is our main ticketing platform.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Good control, good visibility, and a single console to manage all the security gateways in our organization are the best features of Check Point Security Management."
"Being able to install a version of Check Point Security Management helps us avoid the expense of creating a server dedicated to that function, and we save on equipment and technical personnel in installing it, which in the end accelerates the administration and management of equipment to connect to it."
"The product's installation phase was easy."
"The interface also makes it easy for us to configure the VPN from the GUI rather than the command line, which makes it easy even for less experienced engineers to work with."
"Check Point Security Management has positively impacted my organization, with one benefit being that I create one security management for controlling any gateways."
"Check Point Security Management has positively impacted my organization by defining how we oversee and enforce security policies across the entire infrastructure, and instead of juggling multiple consoles, we now have a single, unified view that makes monitoring and response much faster."
"The management API is the best new feature for me. It allows us to further automate our customers' automated server ordering."
"Check Point Security Management has positively impacted my organization, with one benefit being that I create one security management for controlling any gateways."
"The technical support team is helpful."
"The product is stable."
 

Cons

"Check Point Tech Support will not assist with new configurations if we encounter any issues during the configuration process."
"Check Point Security Management can be improved as it requires significant resources, particularly in larger deployments."
"Check Point Security Management can be improved because for smaller organizations with only a single or a couple of devices, there is no need for the management. They are required to use the management system, which increases costs for smaller organizations."
"They need to make a Mac version of the SmartConsole, in my opinion."
"In the future, I would like to see more frequent updates because of the changing security landscape."
"The upgrade procedure already made huge improvements, yet it remains more challenging compared to other products."
"We are not sure if there is a centralized security console available. It would be beneficial if all firewalls could be integrated under one management console."
"Performance and scalability could be improved because log queries and reporting generation can sometimes be slower under heavy loads."
"The prices must be reduced."
"The tool doesn't integrate well with ServiceNow."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If one will be very expensive, and ten means low price, I rate the tool's price as a three out of ten."
"Check Point is much cheaper than the competition ($4/server as compared to $17/server)."
"The pricing can be estimated around 3 or 4 out of 10 in terms of expense."
"The solution is expensive."
"The solution is expensive and there is an annual license."
"This product can be used for 25 security gateways on a basic license."
"Do the homework because Check Point is rather expensive."
"Price-wise, it is an expensive solution."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) solutions are best for your needs.
881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
17%
Security Firm
10%
Marketing Services Firm
8%
Computer Software Company
6%
Comms Service Provider
18%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Healthcare Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business55
Midsize Enterprise32
Large Enterprise43
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Check Point Security Management?
The most beneficial features for us are the alert classifications, which help us prioritize critical issues, and the detailed reports that provide insights into attack origins and purposes, such as...
What needs improvement with Check Point Security Management?
Based on my experience with Check Point Security Management, I do not see anything lacking. It is currently managing all the gateways, and we are able to achieve what we want from our perspective. ...
What is your primary use case for Check Point Security Management?
I am using Check Point Security Management in our day-to-day operations to centrally manage all Check Point Security Gateways within my organization. All of these Check Point Security Gateways are ...
What needs improvement with Cyware Threat Intelligence eXchange?
The threat emails are not tailored to our company. It just gives us every newsletter and bombards our email box. The solution must be able to provide threat feeds. We shouldn’t have to rely on thir...
What is your primary use case for Cyware Threat Intelligence eXchange?
We use the solution for the correlation of threat feeds and reporting.
 

Also Known As

R80.10, R80, R77.30, R77, Check Point R80.10 Security Management, R80 Security Management
CSOL, Fusion and Threat Response, Threat Intelligence eXchange, Security Orchestration and Automation (SOAR)
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Hedgetec, Geiger
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Security Management vs. Cyware Cyber Fusion and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.