Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis vs Fortify Static Code Analyzer comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.7
Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is praised for its scalability, effectively handling multiple projects with high user satisfaction and efficiency.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.2
Checkmarx SCA integrates with CICD pipelines to ensure security by identifying vulnerabilities and license issues with detailed analysis and guidance.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.4
Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis requires price, UI, performance improvements, faster updates, stronger API security, and better support for enhancements.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is stable and reliable, though occasional performance issues occur with geographical cloud usage impacting scan times.
No sentiment score available
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Checkmarx SCA provides 24/7 customer support with knowledgeable service and comprehensive documentation, though some note past service decline.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is costly and complex but valued, prompting many enterprise users to expand its use.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx Software Composit...
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (8th)
Fortify Static Code Analyzer
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
Static Code Analysis (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is designed for Software Composition Analysis (SCA) and holds a mindshare of 2.6%, down 3.1% compared to last year.
Fortify Static Code Analyzer, on the other hand, focuses on Static Code Analysis, holds 23.2% mindshare, up 18.9% since last year.
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
Static Code Analysis
 

Featured Reviews

Sujata Sujata Ghadage - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers great security in the area of vulnerability detection
I am more into the SAST side, which is related to Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis. Checkmarx recently introduced DAST and software composition analysis, but I am not aware much about it. Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis is a good tool with many rules, ensuring that the product offers vulnerability detection and provides good coverage. Though my company has not integrated Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis into SDLC, we do plan to do it in the future. The product helped our company deal with a major security breach when we had to deal with a lot of SQL-related issues stemming from some of the codes, which were written earlier not using a proper framework, owing to which there were many vulnerabilities in respect to LDAP, cross-site attacks and SQL injection. The product's most effective part for identifying vulnerabilities stems from the tool's SAST capabilities. The product's dashboard has improved our company's vulnerability management processes. The tool shows a proper dashboard and offers frequent remediation options and proper compliance status, which helps to know about the number of vulnerabilities and the dashboards. The accuracy of the product's vulnerability detection is 95 percent. At an organizational level, the product is hosted on the cloud. In my company, we use the product to scan reports. I don't see anything complex in the solution from the maintenance point of view. The product is deployed in a single location where multiple people use it. The product can be described as an access-based solution. For a particular project or depending on an assignment, access is given to certain people for a month or two. After the completion of a project or assignment, the product's access to a person is removed and given to another person who needs the solution for another project. I recommend the product to those who plan to use it. It is one of the best tools in the market. The product provides good coverage and ensures that the users experience a return on investment from its use in their environment. The tool is also helpful in dealing with vulnerabilities and false positives. I rate the overall tool a nine out of ten.
Vishal Dhamke - PeerSpot reviewer
An expansive platform with comprehensive security rules and patterns to identify vulnerabilities
Setting up Fortify Static Application Security Testing (SAST) involves several steps to ensure that the tool is correctly configured and integrated into your development workflow, for example: installation, license activation, user access and permissions, integration with the development environment, project configuration, custom rules and policies, etc. The initial setup is very easy. I have used the enterprise version and a standalone version. The enterprise version definitely takes an ample amount of time to deploy because it needs to have a server, other logistics, and a proper RBAC in place. The enterprise version would take an ample amount of time, but the standard version is just a few clicks. A team of four to five people is required for the maintenance, and frequent updates are required to keep all the signatures up to date. I would rate the setup a nine out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Composition Analysis (SCA) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
36%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Computer Software Company
10%
Logistics Company
4%
Financial Services Firm
29%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis?
The tool's visual scan analysis shows me all the libraries' vulnerabilities and license types. It helps identify the most complex issues with licenses. It provides good visibility. SCA shows me all...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis?
We have a license. The usage is limited to one, two, three, five, or ten people. It is currently used for all projects, and there are plans to increase its usage.
What needs improvement with Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis?
Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis should improve dynamic analysis.
What do you like most about Fortify Static Code Analyzer?
Integrating the Fortify Static Code Analyzer into our software development lifecycle was straightforward. It highlights important information beyond just syntax errors. It identifies issues like pa...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortify Static Code Analyzer?
I rate the pricing of Fortify Static Code Analyzer as a seven out of ten since it is a bit expensive.
What needs improvement with Fortify Static Code Analyzer?
False positives need improvement in the future. Fortify's vulnerability remediation guidance helps improve code security, but I think they need to improve the focus of the solution, as it still Con...
 

Also Known As

CxSCA
Fortify Static Code Analysis SAST
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

AXA, Liveperson, Aaron's, Playtech, Morningstar
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Black Duck, Veracode, Snyk and others in Software Composition Analysis (SCA). Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.