Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Checkmk vs IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor comparison

Checkmk and IDERA are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Checkmk is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.4, while IDERA is ranked #106. Checkmk holds a 3.6% mindshare in NMS, compared to IDERA’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Checkmk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IDERA users who would recommend it.
Checkmk
Read 9 Checkmk reviews
  • 3,526 Views
  • 3,137 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
IDERA Uptime Infrastructure...
Read 5 IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor reviews
  • 153 Views
  • 113 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor and Checkmk compete in the server and network monitoring software market. Checkmk seems to have the upper hand for its advanced features despite IDERA being more affordable with quality customer support.

Features: IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor provides strong server performance, application monitoring, and real-time alerts. Checkmk offers comprehensive monitoring capabilities with integration into cloud services, customization through its open-source edition, and scalability in monitoring.

Room for Improvement:IDERA could enhance customization options, integrate more seamlessly with cloud services, and expand its monitoring capabilities. Checkmk might improve in user-friendliness, reduce the complexity of its configuration process, and enhance support for smaller enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor supports straightforward deployment and strong customer service, enabling simpler network monitoring setups. Checkmk offers modular deployment with flexibility suited for complex environments but may demand higher configuration expertise, which could challenge those seeking ease and support.

Pricing and ROI: IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor offers competitive pricing advantageous for small to medium-sized businesses, promising good ROI. Checkmk might demand higher upfront costs but provides significant ROI due to its extensive monitoring tools and adaptability, justifying the expenses for organizations in need of robust monitoring solutions.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Checkmk vs. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Checkmk vs. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 847,772 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Checkmk
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
11th
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
13th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
Server Monitoring (5th), Cloud Monitoring Software (12th)
IDERA Uptime Infrastructure...
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
106th
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
73rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Checkmk is 3.6%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

Paolo Sala - PeerSpot reviewer
A reasonably priced tool for system and application monitoring
The main room for improvement is in the solution's presentation and the integration area. In our company, we use the integration capabilities from ServiceNow. We also have another big monitoring solution in place in our company, which is Dynatrace. At the moment, there doesn't exist an out-of-the-box integration for Dynatrace. I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most. The only implementation of Checkmk that allows high availability is the virtual appliance that has the option for the availability of a different box. Otherwise, you have to find a way to implement it manually with some custom solution, which could be an improvement.
Read full review
Nafiu Garba - PeerSpot reviewer
It offers different licensing types that allow you to extend the services to clients; it lets you look into device performance and optimization and helps apply best practices
What I like best about IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is that it offers different licensing types. Hence, it allows my organization to extend the services to clients and not just use the solution within the organization. My organization can leverage IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to learn more about how clients perform because the solution lets you monitor and optimize devices and apply best practices.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Checkmk was built on a platform that was user-friendly, and I could build my charts easily."
"The most valuable features of Checkmk are its resource monitoring, infra monitoring, and log factor configuration."
"I really like the auto-discovery feature."
"Overall, from one to ten, I rate Checkmk a nine."
"Checkmk helps me compare data and foresee issues."
"The alerting system in Checkmk really works properly."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"It's versatile, scalable, and easier to use compared to other solutions like Nagios and OMD."
More Checkmk pros
"My organization can leverage IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to learn more about how clients perform because the solution lets you monitor and optimize devices and apply best practices."
 

Cons

"Sometimes we receive alerts, and it can become annoying when you acknowledge an alert. It is very clunky when you acknowledge the alert. The process is not very intuitive, and there are instances where it feels a bit cumbersome to acknowledge an alert."
"The main challenge for us is that we're moving from Nagios to Checkmk, and we're still getting used to the new way of working."
"I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most."
"If an alert is generated for a specific pattern in the log, and if Checkmk catches that log, it will stay there even after the alert is resolved."
"The initial setup is a bit complex."
"Checkmk does not work too easily with the PowerStore. I use a PowerShell script as Checkmk runs on Linux and a Windows system, connecting with the Checkmk agent."
"Checkmk does not allow running scripts at varying intervals."
"It is easy for tech-savvy people, but newcomers might find it intimidating."
More Checkmk cons
"What I want to improve in IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is the community aspect, where IDERA would provide customers with updates on functionalities, what comes next, what IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor upgrades would be released, etc. I also want the sustainability of IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to improve."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Checkmk is cheaper compared to other enterprise products."
"The product is affordable."
"Checkmk is a fairly reasonably priced solution."
"I'm based in Nigeria, and the conversion rate affects the pricing for IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor, but globally, pricing is reasonable. I'm rating pricing for the solution seven on a scale of one to ten."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
847,772 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Checkmk?
The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Checkmk?
I will get more information about Checkmk when the proof of concept is done. It's going to be before the summer. There will be a report about the tool and a recommendation to use it. So far, it loo...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Checkmk?
Checkmk ( /products/checkmk-reviews ) is a monitoring tool, so that's what I will use it for. Right now, it's not in production, but it's in a proof of concept phase. It looks good, so probably, du...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Checkmk Logo
Zabbix vs Checkmk
Compared 49% of the time
Icinga vs Checkmk Logo
Icinga vs Checkmk
Compared 9% of the time
LibreNMS vs Checkmk Logo
LibreNMS vs Checkmk
Compared 7% of the time
PRTG Network Monitor vs Checkmk Logo
PRTG Network Monitor vs Checkmk
Compared 3% of the time
Centreon vs Checkmk Logo
Centreon vs Checkmk
Compared 3% of the time
More Checkmk Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Checkmk
April 2025
Checkmk reportDownload Checkmk product report
Buyer's Guide
Network Monitoring Software
March 2025
IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor reportDownload IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
IDERA UIM, uptime software up.time
 

Overview

Checkmk is a powerful tool for monitoring IT infrastructure, providing vital insights on servers, databases, network devices, and custom applications.

Primarily used for supervising IT infrastructure, Checkmk helps organizations ensure service availability by monitoring hosts, processes, load, storage, and network appliances. With support for both Linux and Windows environments across multiple data centers, Checkmk performs compliance checks and preserves historical data for core network devices.

What are the key features of Checkmk?
  • Auto-discovery: Automatically identifies new hosts and applies monitoring rules.
  • Custom monitoring: Enhances MySQL performance tracking.
  • Slack integration: Provides immediate downtime alerts.
  • Graphical trend analysis: Offers 400 days of trend data.
  • Multiple site monitoring: Ensures seamless data synchronization through task automation.
  • Resource and infrastructure monitoring: Configures log factors to fit budget constraints.
  • System metric imports: Includes servers, SQL, file systems, and application monitoring.
What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?
  • Time-saving: Auto-discovery and task automation streamline processes.
  • Proactive alerts: Immediate downtime notifications optimize response times.
  • Historical insights: Long-term graphical trend analysis aids strategic planning.
  • Cost efficiency: Resource monitoring aligned with budget constraints.

Checkmk is deployed extensively in large enterprise environments for monitoring critical infrastructure. It proves particularly useful under conditions of frequent power outages or network issues, helping maintain smooth operations. While the alert acknowledgment process and interface require improvements, and the lack of an agent-less platform complicates server management, the strengths in auto-discovery, integration, and comprehensive monitoring make Checkmk a strong contender for IT infrastructure monitoring.

Checkmk

Uptime Infrastructure Monitor helps IT administrators to unify performance monitoring and optimization of IT infrastructure. Unlike its competition, it provides monitoring of a broad range of platforms and applications, ability to set service-level agreements, and support of both agent and agentless monitoring.

IDERA
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
TeleComputing; Manitoba Hydro; Blevins Inc.; City of Malmö
Buyer's Guide
Checkmk vs. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor
April 2025
Free Report: Checkmk vs. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor
Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmk vs. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
847,772 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Checkmk vs. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.