Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Checkmk vs Loom Systems comparison

Checkmk and ServiceNow are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Checkmk is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.4, while ServiceNow is ranked #64. Checkmk holds a 3.9% mindshare in IM, compared to ServiceNow’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Checkmk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of ServiceNow users who would recommend it.
Checkmk
Read 9 Checkmk reviews
  • 3,360 Views
  • 2,982 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Loom Systems
Read 4 Loom Systems reviews
  • 285 Views
  • 175 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Loom Systems and Checkmk compete in the IT operations management space. Loom Systems appears strong in predictive analytics and integration, while Checkmk excels in scalability and monitoring features.

Features: Loom Systems offers AI-driven analytics, real-time insights, and automated anomaly detection. Checkmk provides extensive platform integration, detailed performance tuning, and supports comprehensive IT infrastructure oversight.

Room for Improvement: Loom Systems can improve scalability, monitoring comprehensiveness, and provide more flexible deployment options. Checkmk could enhance initial setup simplicity, improve real-time analytics, and offer more proactive alert features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Loom Systems offers easy setup and agile deployment via a cloud-based model, with dedicated support and high responsiveness. Checkmk provides both on-premise and cloud deployment, backed by extensive documentation and community support, although initial setup can be more complex.

Pricing and ROI: Loom Systems generally has higher initial setup costs but offers significant ROI due to advanced analytics reducing operational downtime. Checkmk offers a flexible pricing model with lower upfront costs, delivering ROI through optimized infrastructure management at a lower initial investment.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Checkmk vs. Loom Systems Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Checkmk vs. Loom Systems
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 847,625 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Checkmk
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
13th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (11th), Server Monitoring (5th), Cloud Monitoring Software (12th)
Loom Systems
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
64th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Anomaly Detection Tools (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Checkmk is 3.9%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Loom Systems is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

Paolo Sala - PeerSpot reviewer
A reasonably priced tool for system and application monitoring
The main room for improvement is in the solution's presentation and the integration area. In our company, we use the integration capabilities from ServiceNow. We also have another big monitoring solution in place in our company, which is Dynatrace. At the moment, there doesn't exist an out-of-the-box integration for Dynatrace. I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most. The only implementation of Checkmk that allows high availability is the virtual appliance that has the option for the availability of a different box. Otherwise, you have to find a way to implement it manually with some custom solution, which could be an improvement.
Read full review
Keerthi Kumar Sangaraju - PeerSpot reviewer
Stable, easy to set up, flexible, and has multiple functionalities, but needs to define priority levels for each incident
What's lacking in Loom Systems is the level of priority for each incident. For example, after implementation and there was a huge impact on the client, and the client comes back to you and says that there's an incident, that there needs to be an immediate resolution for it, you'll see severity one, severity two, etc., in Loom Systems, rather than priority levels. It would be better if the incidents can be defined as low priority, medium priority, or high priority.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Overall, from one to ten, I rate Checkmk a nine."
"Checkmk was built on a platform that was user-friendly, and I could build my charts easily."
"Checkmk helps me compare data and foresee issues."
"We can monitor multiple sites using the product."
"The most valuable features of Checkmk are its resource monitoring, infra monitoring, and log factor configuration."
"The initial setup of Checkmk was easy...It is a very stable solution."
"I really like the auto-discovery feature."
"It's versatile, scalable, and easier to use compared to other solutions like Nagios and OMD."
More Checkmk pros
"You can develop your own apps within Loom, and they can be configured very simply."
"What I like best about Loom Systems is that you can use it for infrastructure monitoring. I also like that it's a flexible solution."
"The solution is absolutely scalable. If an organization needs to expand it out they definitely can."
"The RFS portion of the solution is the product's most valuable feature."
 

Cons

"The main challenge for us is that we're moving from Nagios to Checkmk, and we're still getting used to the new way of working."
"Checkmk does not allow running scripts at varying intervals."
"Sometimes we receive alerts, and it can become annoying when you acknowledge an alert. It is very clunky when you acknowledge the alert. The process is not very intuitive, and there are instances where it feels a bit cumbersome to acknowledge an alert."
"In Checkmk, the documentation can probably be improved a bit more."
"The initial setup is a bit complex."
"I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most."
"Checkmk does not work too easily with the PowerStore. I use a PowerShell script as Checkmk runs on Linux and a Windows system, connecting with the Checkmk agent."
"If an alert is generated for a specific pattern in the log, and if Checkmk catches that log, it will stay there even after the alert is resolved."
More Checkmk cons
"What's lacking in Loom Systems is the level of priority for each incident. For example, after implementation and there was a huge impact on the client, and the client comes back to you and says that there's an incident, that there needs to be an immediate resolution for it, you'll see severity one, severity two, etc., in Loom Systems, rather than priority levels. It would be better if the incidents can be defined as low priority, medium priority, or high priority."
"The discovery and mapping still takes a lot of human intervention, it's quite resource heavy,"
"The change management within the solution needs to be improved. There needs to be more process automation."
"The reporting is a bit weak. They should work to improve this aspect of the product."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Checkmk is a fairly reasonably priced solution."
"The price of Checkmk is cheaper compared to other enterprise products."
"The product is affordable."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
22%
Real Estate/Law Firm
10%
Construction Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Checkmk?
The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Checkmk?
I will get more information about Checkmk when the proof of concept is done. It's going to be before the summer. There will be a report about the tool and a recommendation to use it. So far, it loo...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Checkmk?
Checkmk ( /products/checkmk-reviews ) is a monitoring tool, so that's what I will use it for. Right now, it's not in production, but it's in a proof of concept phase. It looks good, so probably, du...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Checkmk Logo
Zabbix vs Checkmk
Compared 49% of the time
Icinga vs Checkmk Logo
Icinga vs Checkmk
Compared 9% of the time
LibreNMS vs Checkmk Logo
LibreNMS vs Checkmk
Compared 7% of the time
Centreon vs Checkmk Logo
Centreon vs Checkmk
Compared 4% of the time
PRTG Network Monitor vs Checkmk Logo
PRTG Network Monitor vs Checkmk
Compared 3% of the time
More Checkmk Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Checkmk
April 2025
Checkmk reportDownload Checkmk product report
Buyer's Guide
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
March 2025
Loom Systems reportDownload Loom Systems product report
 

Overview

Checkmk is a powerful tool for monitoring IT infrastructure, providing vital insights on servers, databases, network devices, and custom applications.

Primarily used for supervising IT infrastructure, Checkmk helps organizations ensure service availability by monitoring hosts, processes, load, storage, and network appliances. With support for both Linux and Windows environments across multiple data centers, Checkmk performs compliance checks and preserves historical data for core network devices.

What are the key features of Checkmk?
  • Auto-discovery: Automatically identifies new hosts and applies monitoring rules.
  • Custom monitoring: Enhances MySQL performance tracking.
  • Slack integration: Provides immediate downtime alerts.
  • Graphical trend analysis: Offers 400 days of trend data.
  • Multiple site monitoring: Ensures seamless data synchronization through task automation.
  • Resource and infrastructure monitoring: Configures log factors to fit budget constraints.
  • System metric imports: Includes servers, SQL, file systems, and application monitoring.
What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?
  • Time-saving: Auto-discovery and task automation streamline processes.
  • Proactive alerts: Immediate downtime notifications optimize response times.
  • Historical insights: Long-term graphical trend analysis aids strategic planning.
  • Cost efficiency: Resource monitoring aligned with budget constraints.

Checkmk is deployed extensively in large enterprise environments for monitoring critical infrastructure. It proves particularly useful under conditions of frequent power outages or network issues, helping maintain smooth operations. While the alert acknowledgment process and interface require improvements, and the lack of an agent-less platform complicates server management, the strengths in auto-discovery, integration, and comprehensive monitoring make Checkmk a strong contender for IT infrastructure monitoring.

Checkmk
Loom Systems delivers an advanced AI-powered operational analytics platform to predict and prevent problems in the digital business. DevOps & IT teams use Loom for real-time detection and resolution for any type of application, including home-grown. Loom analyzes logs and metrics in all formats, performs smart correlations and root cause analysis to help organizations gain immediate into their environments. Loom stands alone in the industry as an AI platform requiring no prior math knowledge from its operators, leveraging your existing staff to succeed in the digital era. Getting started is easy - zero configuration and data pre-processing needed, so you can stream your data in its raw format.
ServiceNow
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Citrix, Amdocs, Sysaid, Hexaware, Effibar, Revtrak, Taptica
Buyer's Guide
Checkmk vs. Loom Systems
March 2025
Free Report: Checkmk vs. Loom Systems
Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmk vs. Loom Systems and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Checkmk vs. Loom Systems report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.