Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cisco TelePresence vs IBM Cloud Video comparison

Cisco and IBM are both solutions in the Virtual Meetings category. Cisco is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0, while IBM is ranked #40. Cisco holds a 3.4% mindshare in VM, compared to IBM’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM users who would recommend it.
Cisco TelePresence
Read 9 Cisco TelePresence reviews
  • 634 Views
  • 318 Comparison Views
85% willing to recommend
IBM Cloud Video
Read 1 IBM Cloud Video review
  • 55 Views
  • 25 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Cisco TelePresence and IBM Cloud Video based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zoom Video Communications, Cisco, Microsoft and others in Virtual Meetings.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Virtual Meetings Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Virtual Meetings
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 847,772 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco TelePresence
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
9th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM Cloud Video
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
40th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.4
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
CDN (31st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Virtual Meetings category, the mindshare of Cisco TelePresence is 3.4%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Cloud Video is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Virtual Meetings
 

Featured Reviews

OSCAR DE LA PENA - PeerSpot reviewer
One-click meeting access and seamless integration enhance video conferencing experience
Cisco TelePresence could improve the WebRTC connections, as they are quite slow. The end user experiences delays when using WebRTC, sometimes taking one minute or more to receive a connection. This issue is mainly due to Cisco taking a long time to download and start the WebRTC client on their devices. Ensuring it is embedded in the device could help.
Read full review
RL
Great user interface and easy to implement
I like the corporate looking user interface for the audience and very straight forward log-in process too. The user interface of other solutions such as GoToWebinar can be confusing for a less tech-savvy audience. IBM has thoroughly thought through everything and the flexibility to integrate the API to expand the registration gateway allows us to have an extra layer of security. Furthermore, the brand IBM is reputable in the market for its data and network security.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The configuration is a valuable."
"Cisco is a leader in video conferencing solutions because they apply the latest technologies to their devices and services, such as artificial intelligence and versatile functionalities."
"We have a dual screen option to enable video and content sharing."
"TelePresence allows our customers to have a quick meeting while traveling and still be effective. It saves time and money."
"The speaker tracker feature in Cisco Telepresence is highly valuable, especially the ability to track multiple participants and change focus during meetings."
"The SpeakerTrack feature is the most valuable feature."
"It was stable. So, I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable features of Cisco TelePresence are the basic standard features and the ease of use. Additionally, the configuration and integration are exemplary."
More Cisco TelePresence pros
"I like the user interface. There aren't too many buttons that the audience will have to fiddle with."
 

Cons

"The price of Cisco TelePresence overall should be reduced."
"Cisco TelePresence could improve the WebRTC connections, as they are quite slow."
"Cisco TelePresence could improve its integration capabilities."
"MX800 comes only with one available DVI port. A few more HDMI ports will improve the system's capability."
"The calling features can be improved."
"I would rate my experience with the initial setup a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. It was complex with badges and certificates. Too crazy."
"I was in touch with one of our clients and they mentioned that they would like to have a holographic video conferencing. It would be great if that feature would be added."
"The tool is expensive."
"They should improve the registration gateway. Currently, you can't do a pre-event registration that's straightforward. You have to do an API to integrate. It would be a lot easier if they had that."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is expensive, therefore I rate it an eight out of ten."
"We used high definition, 1080p, but again, it required license purchases. For example, with three licenses (TP licenses), each allowing one 1080p screen, if I had six participants, I'd need to lower the resolution to 720p or lower to accommodate more participants. More licenses meant more cost."
"I will rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."
"Cisco TelePresence license is expensive and should be reduced. There is only a cost for the license and it is annually."
"The price of Cisco Telepresence is high, especially in Brazil. However, the quality of the product justifies the cost."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
847,772 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
University
14%
Government
13%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco TelePresence?
It was stable. So, I would rate the stability a ten out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Cisco TelePresence?
Cisco TelePresence could improve its integration capabilities. As for additional features, I would like to see an improved ceiling microphone solution in the next versions.
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Cisco TelePresence?
I recommend it to clients and would rate it 10 out of 10.
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Webex vs Cisco TelePresence Logo
Webex vs Cisco TelePresence
Compared 31% of the time
Polycom RealPresence Clariti vs Cisco TelePresence Logo
Polycom RealPresence Clariti vs Cisco TelePresence
Compared 27% of the time
Polycom RealPresence Desktop vs Cisco TelePresence Logo
Polycom RealPresence Desktop vs Cisco TelePresence
Compared 23% of the time
Zoom vs Cisco TelePresence Logo
Zoom vs Cisco TelePresence
Compared 19% of the time
More Cisco TelePresence Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Virtual Meetings
April 2025
Cisco TelePresence reportDownload Cisco TelePresence product report
Buyer's Guide
Virtual Meetings
April 2025
IBM Cloud Video reportDownload IBM Cloud Video product report
 

Also Known As

TelePresence
IBM Ustream
 

Overview

Cisco TelePresence Server brings multiparty video to unified communications deployments. Its flexible video, audio, and content-sharing capabilities allow users to participate in video conferences with multiple parties. Users can easily create, launch, and join meetings using standards-based video endpoints. Or their mobile devices or Cisco WebEx clients. Or even third-party video endpoints. The server provides high-quality, standards-based video conferencing for mobile, desktop, and room systems.
Cisco
With cognitive and AI infused technologies, IBM Cloud Video empowers customers to enhance live and on-demand video opportunities, and maximize viewer engagement.
IBM
 

Sample Customers

Afni, AGCO, Bellevue, Came Group, Children's Hospital of Orange County (CHOC Children's), Del Papa Distributing, Instituto Zaldivar, ING Bank, Moffitt Cancer Center, Park Nicollet, Pentana Solutions Australia, San Jose State University, Sub-Zero Wolf, Transwestern and Metropolis Investment Holdings, Vital Images
Airbnb, N3 Results, University of Notre Dame
Buyer's Guide
Virtual Meetings
April 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Zoom Video Communications, Cisco, Microsoft and others in Virtual Meetings. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
847,772 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.

We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.