Cisco TelePresence vs Polycom RealPresence Clariti comparison

"It was stable. So, I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."

"TelePresence allows our customers to have a quick meeting while traveling and still be effective. It saves time and money."

"Telepresence's most valuable feature is keeping highly paid employees, such as executives, on the ground instead of wasting time flying around the world. So if you have the right telepresence plan and form, it's not just the video cameras and the systems behind them, it's the way you lay out your meeting room.You can have multiple offices interconnecting in a single meeting, and it looks like everybody's in the same big conference room together because the telepresence yields such a fantastic amount of clarity."

"PresenterTrack cameras improve the meeting experience."

"The configuration is a valuable."

"The SpeakerTrack feature is the most valuable feature."

"We have a dual screen option to enable video and content sharing."

"The most valuable features of Cisco TelePresence are the basic standard features and the ease of use. Additionally, the configuration and integration are exemplary."

"Some proprietary Polycom features include speaker tracking, acoustic fencing, noise cancellation, active noise cancellation, and noise cancellation AI."

"The most valuable feature is its integration with solutions like Zoom and Teams for endpoints. The picture quality is high, and the conference sessions are stable."

"It's on-prem, which is great."

"It does a good job of integrating with other software."

"Cisco TelePresence could improve its integration capabilities."

"The price of Cisco TelePresence overall should be reduced."

"The calling features can be improved."

"I was in touch with one of our clients and they mentioned that they would like to have a holographic video conferencing. It would be great if that feature would be added."

"I would rate my experience with the initial setup a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. It was complex with badges and certificates. Too crazy."

"MX800 comes only with one available DVI port. A few more HDMI ports will improve the system's capability."

"The tool is expensive."

"The customer needs this platform to be a little bit more customized."

"The most valuable feature is its integration with solutions like Zoom and Teams for endpoints. The picture quality is high, and the conference sessions are stable."

"Could have a wider range of use cases."

"Polycom RealPresence Clariti is very bad when moving towards the cloud."

"We used high definition, 1080p, but again, it required license purchases. For example, with three licenses (TP licenses), each allowing one 1080p screen, if I had six participants, I'd need to lower the resolution to 720p or lower to accommodate more participants. More licenses meant more cost."

"The price of Cisco Telepresence is high, especially in Brazil. However, the quality of the product justifies the cost."

"I will rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"Cisco TelePresence license is expensive and should be reduced. There is only a cost for the license and it is annually."

"The pricing is expensive, therefore I rate it an eight out of ten."

"Polycom RealPresence Clariti is definitely more expensive than others in the market because of its high quality."