Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cisco TelePresence vs LifeSize comparison

Cisco and Enghouse Video are both solutions in the Virtual Meetings category. Cisco is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0, while Enghouse Video is ranked #36. Cisco holds a 4.6% mindshare in VM, compared to Enghouse Video’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution.
Cisco TelePresence
Read 8 Cisco TelePresence reviews
  • 739 Views
  • 406 Comparison Views
85% willing to recommend
LifeSize
Read 1 LifeSize review
  • 67 Views
  • 41 Comparison Views
0% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Cisco TelePresence and LifeSize based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zoom Video Communications, Cisco, Microsoft and others in Virtual Meetings.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Virtual Meetings Report (Updated: November 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Virtual Meetings
November 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 824,053 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco TelePresence
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
8th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
LifeSize
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
36th
Average Rating
5.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Virtual Meetings category, the mindshare of Cisco TelePresence is 4.6%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LifeSize is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Virtual Meetings
 

Featured Reviews

CarolineXavier - PeerSpot reviewer
It's our go-to solution for demonstrating our services to clients
I use Cisco Telepresence for meetings with clients and internal meetings. It's our go-to solution for demonstrating our services to clients The speaker tracker feature in Cisco Telepresence is highly valuable, especially the ability to track multiple participants and change focus during…
Read full review
it_user1320285 - PeerSpot reviewer
Good video conferencing but it needs to support third-party hardware
We are using Lifesize for video conferencing and virtual meetings The most valuable feature is video conferencing. This solution needs better platform integration with third-parties such as Microsoft and Cisco. It needs support for third-party hardware as opposed to only Lifesize-branded…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It was stable. So, I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."
"The SpeakerTrack feature is the most valuable feature."
"TelePresence allows our customers to have a quick meeting while traveling and still be effective. It saves time and money."
"The most valuable features of Cisco TelePresence are the basic standard features and the ease of use. Additionally, the configuration and integration are exemplary."
"The speaker tracker feature in Cisco Telepresence is highly valuable, especially the ability to track multiple participants and change focus during meetings."
"The configuration is a valuable."
"PresenterTrack cameras improve the meeting experience."
"We have a dual screen option to enable video and content sharing."
More Cisco TelePresence pros
"The most valuable feature is video conferencing."
 

Cons

"The price of Cisco TelePresence overall should be reduced."
"Cisco TelePresence could improve its integration capabilities."
"I would rate my experience with the initial setup a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. It was complex with badges and certificates. Too crazy."
"MX800 comes only with one available DVI port. A few more HDMI ports will improve the system's capability."
"I was in touch with one of our clients and they mentioned that they would like to have a holographic video conferencing. It would be great if that feature would be added."
"The calling features can be improved."
"The tool is expensive."
"This solution needs better platform integration with third-parties such as Microsoft and Cisco."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I will rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."
"The pricing is expensive, therefore I rate it an eight out of ten."
"The price of Cisco Telepresence is high, especially in Brazil. However, the quality of the product justifies the cost."
"Cisco TelePresence license is expensive and should be reduced. There is only a cost for the license and it is annually."
"We used high definition, 1080p, but again, it required license purchases. For example, with three licenses (TP licenses), each allowing one 1080p screen, if I had six participants, I'd need to lower the resolution to 720p or lower to accommodate more participants. More licenses meant more cost."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
12%
University
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco TelePresence?
It was stable. So, I would rate the stability a ten out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Cisco TelePresence?
Cisco TelePresence could improve its integration capabilities. As for additional features, I would like to see an improved ceiling microphone solution in the next versions.
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Cisco TelePresence?
I recommend it to clients and would rate it 10 out of 10.
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Webex vs Cisco TelePresence Logo
Webex vs Cisco TelePresence
Compared 35% of the time
Polycom RealPresence Clariti vs Cisco TelePresence Logo
Polycom RealPresence Clariti vs Cisco TelePresence
Compared 23% of the time
Zoom vs Cisco TelePresence Logo
Zoom vs Cisco TelePresence
Compared 17% of the time
Polycom RealPresence Desktop vs Cisco TelePresence Logo
Polycom RealPresence Desktop vs Cisco TelePresence
Compared 15% of the time
Cisco Meeting Server vs Cisco TelePresence Logo
Cisco Meeting Server vs Cisco TelePresence
Compared 11% of the time
More Cisco TelePresence Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Virtual Meetings
November 2024
Cisco TelePresence reportDownload Cisco TelePresence product report
Buyer's Guide
Virtual Meetings
November 2024
LifeSize reportDownload LifeSize product report
 

Also Known As

TelePresence
LifeSize
 

Learn More

Cisco
Enghouse Video
 

Overview

Cisco TelePresence Server brings multiparty video to unified communications deployments. Its flexible video, audio, and content-sharing capabilities allow users to participate in video conferences with multiple parties. Users can easily create, launch, and join meetings using standards-based video endpoints. Or their mobile devices or Cisco WebEx clients. Or even third-party video endpoints. The server provides high-quality, standards-based video conferencing for mobile, desktop, and room systems.

HD video conferencing platform that is simple to deploy, making instant face-to-face collaboration possible with anyone, anywhere.

 

Sample Customers

Afni, AGCO, Bellevue, Came Group, Children's Hospital of Orange County (CHOC Children's), Del Papa Distributing, Instituto Zaldivar, ING Bank, Moffitt Cancer Center, Park Nicollet, Pentana Solutions Australia, San Jose State University, Sub-Zero Wolf, Transwestern and Metropolis Investment Holdings, Vital Images
Barrow County School System, ActiVision, BBVA, BWB, Bateman, eBay, Epson, Gevers, FannieMae, GlaxoSmithKline, Jones & Walker, KKR, RAF Museum Cosford
Buyer's Guide
Virtual Meetings
November 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Zoom Video Communications, Cisco, Microsoft and others in Virtual Meetings. Updated: November 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.

We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.