Cisco TelePresence vs Zoom comparison

"The configuration is a valuable."

"Telepresence's most valuable feature is keeping highly paid employees, such as executives, on the ground instead of wasting time flying around the world. So if you have the right telepresence plan and form, it's not just the video cameras and the systems behind them, it's the way you lay out your meeting room.You can have multiple offices interconnecting in a single meeting, and it looks like everybody's in the same big conference room together because the telepresence yields such a fantastic amount of clarity."

"PresenterTrack cameras improve the meeting experience."

"The most valuable features of Cisco TelePresence are the basic standard features and the ease of use. Additionally, the configuration and integration are exemplary."

"The SpeakerTrack feature is the most valuable feature."

"The speaker tracker feature in Cisco Telepresence is highly valuable, especially the ability to track multiple participants and change focus during meetings."

"We have a dual screen option to enable video and content sharing."

"It was stable. So, I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."

"Zoom is easy to use and does not consume very much in terms of resources."

"It was easy to use for screen sharing or sharing applications."

"I don't have any issue with the pricing."

"Zoom works fine, and its interface is easier to use than, for example, Teams, which is the other tool I would compare it to. It's also easy to schedule Zoom meetings through Outlook."

"The Mozilla extension is useful to schedule meetings."

"The product runs pretty smoothly so I haven't had to contact technical support."

"The quality of the connection from Zoom is very good. There are many functions and features available. I am only a basic user and it has more than I will ever use. It has lower bandwidths than other products that we have used and has worked well. It is important to have good quality sound and video than anything else."

"The solution is stable and user-friendly."

"Cisco TelePresence could improve its integration capabilities."

"The calling features can be improved."

"I would rate my experience with the initial setup a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. It was complex with badges and certificates. Too crazy."

"MX800 comes only with one available DVI port. A few more HDMI ports will improve the system's capability."

"The tool is expensive."

"The price of Cisco TelePresence overall should be reduced."

"I was in touch with one of our clients and they mentioned that they would like to have a holographic video conferencing. It would be great if that feature would be added."

"Zoom should improve aspects of its security."

"The interface could be more user-friendly."

"We use screen sharing, but sometimes it can be awkward because you might accidentally share the wrong screen, including personal ones. ......Similar to the integration between Google Calendar and Google Meet, having everything in one environment would be much more convenient for scheduling meetings."

"The video quality should be better. Sometimes when there are updates at the backend, Zoom won't respond properly during that time."

"If anything, the updates could be less frequent."

"Making Zoom Phone available in all countries is recommended. It would have been good to connect with people outside using Zoom Phone."

"In addition to Zoom, I frequently utilize Slack, and I particularly appreciate its huddle functionality. What I find appealing about Slack is the ability to simultaneously chat and have video capabilities. It would be beneficial if Zoom offered similar features integrated with some form of channel system, although I acknowledge that I am not involved in the product management aspect. Personally, I believe this integration would make Zoom even more compelling and engaging for users like myself."

"Zoom's stability is an area with certain shortcomings that need improvement."

"The pricing is expensive, therefore I rate it an eight out of ten."

"The price of Cisco Telepresence is high, especially in Brazil. However, the quality of the product justifies the cost."

"We used high definition, 1080p, but again, it required license purchases. For example, with three licenses (TP licenses), each allowing one 1080p screen, if I had six participants, I'd need to lower the resolution to 720p or lower to accommodate more participants. More licenses meant more cost."

"Cisco TelePresence license is expensive and should be reduced. There is only a cost for the license and it is annually."

"I will rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"There is some basic functionality that's free but if you want to host longer meetings and have more participants, then there is a licensing fee."

"The price of Zoom is a bit expensive."

"We purchased a license for Zoom."

"There is a free version of Zoom which allows you a certain limited amount of time usage and there is a corporate version of the solution where you have to pay."

"The pricing is too high. The cost of the license could be cheaper."

"I am making yearly payments. So, I am paying 250 USD a year."

"We use the free version of the product. We utilize it only three to four times a month."

"I use the tool's free version."