

Skype for Business and Zoom Workplace Business compete in the communication and collaboration tools category. Zoom appears to have the upper hand due to its wide array of features and user-friendly interface, which appeal significantly despite its associated costs.
Features: Skype for Business integrates seamlessly with Microsoft's suite, supports a range of client devices, and enables third-party federation, boosting productivity with instant messaging, conferencing, and VoIP. It offers dependable conferencing options for a cohesive collaboration experience. Zoom, on the other hand, focuses on user-friendliness and intuitive video conferencing, along with compatibility across various browsers and devices. Effective screen sharing, scheduling, and video quality make Zoom ideal for larger meetings.
Room for Improvement: Skype has issues with interoperability, often needing costly gateways for third-party communication, and struggles with latency and connectivity, requiring enhancements in audio quality and feature parity with rivals like Teams. Zoom is criticized for security concerns, stability issues during large meetings, and limited integration capabilities; improving access to third-party integrations and refining the user experience are key areas for Zoom to address.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products support various deployment models. Zoom prefers cloud-based solutions over on-premises arrangements. While Skype benefits from dependable Microsoft support, Zoom's customer service receives mixed reviews in terms of responsiveness. However, Zoom’s straightforward deployment in different environments aligns with its user-friendly approach, though further customization could boost user satisfaction.
Pricing and ROI: Skype for Business is cost-effective within a Microsoft-focused infrastructure, often bundled with Office 365, suits larger setups. Zoom offers scalable pricing, popular for its free tier despite meeting duration restrictions. Zoom’s return on investment benefits from its economic efficiency and reduced need for enterprise resources. While Skype can be financially favorable in Microsoft settings, Zoom's flexible pricing structure and lower operational costs make it a viable choice for diverse teams.
Zoom definitely saves time and makes my work more efficient.
I rate the customer support a 10 out of 10, as the total support provided was commendable, and we really enjoyed their assistance.
If there's an issue, I reach out to their support, and they respond quickly without major problems.
There is a wealth of information available on the internet because many users have asked for support and the solutions are published online.
The latency is good, the bandwidth is good, and both upscaling and downscaling work really well.
Scalability is good.
Microsoft Teams automatically removes noise.
I didn't have any problem with Zoom, and overall with Zoom, there are no connection issues, stability, or performance problems.
It does take up a lot of computer bandwidth, which can slow down performance, especially when I'm sharing screens.
Zoom Workplace Business is definitely a stable solution.
The application tends to select the internal microphone on devices rather than detecting external headphones.
For students, it would be beneficial to have access through the university for longer meetings.
Sometimes there's an issue with changing links to meetings if someone is the organizer and then they're not anymore.
There is potential for Zoom to integrate functionalities like Gong, offering sales insights and follow-up suggestions.
Since we use it from the AWS Marketplace, they helped us get proper licensing directly with plan flexibility and non-proprietary hardware, keeping the overall deployment cost competitive compared to a traditional room.
For education use, having more affordable access through institutions would be beneficial.
Zoom could make its pricing more reasonable for individual users.
The conversation history feature in Skype for Business is particularly useful because it links with Outlook.
I find screen sharing, video options, providing remote access, chatting, raising hands, and interactive features during meetings to be extremely valuable.
the ability to share your screen
Zoom is user-friendly, straightforward, and easy to connect with.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Zoom Workplace Business | 9.4% |
| Skype for Business | 5.9% |
| Other | 84.7% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 19 |
| Large Enterprise | 27 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 99 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 33 |
| Large Enterprise | 102 |
Zoom Workplace Business enhances communication for teams with features like video conferencing, screen sharing, and security measures. Its intuitive interface supports seamless collaboration, making it a practical choice for remote work and digital meetings.
Zoom Workplace Business is designed for efficient communication through its user-friendly platform, offering essential tools like screen sharing, breakout rooms, and remote access. Its stability and ease of use across devices make it a beneficial choice for many organizations. While integrating well with popular apps, it also delivers secure meeting environments with high audio and video quality. There are areas for enhancement such as additional security features and improved support for file sharing. Users note a need for reduced bandwidth use, better audio noise filtering, and clarity in navigation options.
What are the key features of Zoom Workplace Business?In industries like education, healthcare, and corporate sectors, Zoom Workplace Business is widely used for webinars, client meetings, and internal communications. It supports online training, and remote work and enables companies to engage effectively with clients and employees scattered across locations. Many industries value its integration capabilities which streamline workflows and contribute to productivity.
We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.