Cisco TelePresence vs Webex Meetings with AT&T comparison

Cisco and AT&T are both solutions in the Virtual Meetings category. Cisco is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0, while AT&T is ranked #11 with an average rating of 10.0. Cisco holds a 3.4% mindshare in VM, compared to AT&T’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of AT&T users who would recommend it.

Cisco TelePresence

Read 9 Cisco TelePresence reviews

634 Views
318 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Webex Meetings with AT&T

Read 6 Webex Meetings with AT&T reviews

86 Views
24 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Cisco TelePresence

Webex Meetings with AT&T

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

```html

Cisco TelePresence and Webex Meetings with AT&T are competing products in the virtual communication and collaboration category. Webex Meetings with AT&T seems to have the upper hand due to its versatile range of features and seamless integration, providing better value for cost-conscious businesses.

Features: Cisco TelePresence provides high-definition video quality, a lifelike meeting experience, and exceptional integration capabilities that support complex setups for executive communication. Webex Meetings with AT&T includes real-time chat, cloud recording, and multiple tool integrations like screen sharing, which enhance its functionality for various communication needs.

Room for Improvement: Cisco TelePresence's initial hardware investment can be prohibitive, and its complex setup may deter some users. Flexibility and feature expansion could enhance user adoption. Webex Meetings with AT&T could improve its high-definition video quality and personalization options and enhance its user interface for more intuitive usage.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco TelePresence requires a more intricate setup and specific customer service due to its hardware requirements. In contrast, Webex Meetings with AT&T offers effortless cloud-based deployment and utilizes AT&T's robust network for reliable support, making it faster to implement and maintain.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco TelePresence involves substantial upfront costs, resulting in a slower ROI yet offers top-tier interaction quality. Webex Meetings with AT&T offers flexible subscription plans, providing cost-effective solutions with a quicker ROI. Its affordability and comprehensive feature set attract businesses aiming to balance budgets with extensive communication features.

```

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco TelePresence vs. Webex Meetings with AT&T Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco TelePresence vs. Webex Meetings with AT&T

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco TelePresence

Ranking in Virtual Meetings

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Webex Meetings with AT&T

Ranking in Virtual Meetings

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Virtual Meetings category, the mindshare of Cisco TelePresence is 3.4%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Webex Meetings with AT&T is 0.2%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Virtual Meetings

Featured Reviews

CarolineXavier

Solutions Architect at NTT Security

It's our go-to solution for demonstrating our services to clients

I use Cisco Telepresence for meetings with clients and internal meetings. It's our go-to solution for demonstrating our services to clients The speaker tracker feature in Cisco Telepresence is highly valuable, especially the ability to track multiple participants and change focus during…

Read full review

Bryant Carthan

Branch Head, Training Branch at United States Marine Corps

It integrates well with our learning management system, but the break-out rooms are a little rough around the edges

There are definitely times when the sound becomes a bit unclear, and latency is also an issue. If there are too many people on video simultaneously, the whole system can slow down. The group breakout rooms are still somewhat rough around the edges. I would like to see them improve that feature so we can have more interaction in our classes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The configuration is a valuable."

"The most valuable features of Cisco TelePresence are the basic standard features and the ease of use. Additionally, the configuration and integration are exemplary."

"The speaker tracker feature in Cisco Telepresence is highly valuable, especially the ability to track multiple participants and change focus during meetings."

"The SpeakerTrack feature is the most valuable feature."

"It was stable. So, I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."

"PresenterTrack cameras improve the meeting experience."

"Telepresence's most valuable feature is keeping highly paid employees, such as executives, on the ground instead of wasting time flying around the world. So if you have the right telepresence plan and form, it's not just the video cameras and the systems behind them, it's the way you lay out your meeting room.You can have multiple offices interconnecting in a single meeting, and it looks like everybody's in the same big conference room together because the telepresence yields such a fantastic amount of clarity."

"We have a dual screen option to enable video and content sharing."

More Cisco TelePresence pros

"Webex Meeting's most valuable features are screen-sharing and remote access."

"The most valuable features for me are its stable connection, user-friendly interface, and screen-sharing files. Cisco's support is also very valuable."

"It made it simple for users to join, work together, and share screens."

"We appreciate how Webex integrates with our system. When an employee completes a course, Webex documents it and updates the employee's training records."

"Installation was straightforward."

"During meetings, the feature of closed captioning, scripting, and recording was convenient for keeping minutes and making available the information discussed to review meeting minutes. Also to keep track of all the agreements and discussions during those meetings. It worked well with our email systems and other communication services integrated into the functionalities."

Cons

"MX800 comes only with one available DVI port. A few more HDMI ports will improve the system's capability."

"Cisco TelePresence could improve its integration capabilities."

"I would rate my experience with the initial setup a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. It was complex with badges and certificates. Too crazy."

"Cisco TelePresence could improve the WebRTC connections, as they are quite slow."

"The calling features can be improved."

"The price of Cisco TelePresence overall should be reduced."

"I was in touch with one of our clients and they mentioned that they would like to have a holographic video conferencing. It would be great if that feature would be added."

"The tool is expensive."

"There are definitely times when the sound becomes a bit unclear, and latency is also an issue. If there are too many people on video simultaneously, the whole system can slow down. The group breakout rooms are still somewhat rough around the edges. I would like to see them improve that feature so we can have more interaction in our classes."

"The features I think can be improved are integrations with third-parties; for example, Microsoft 360 and other shared folders."

"Webex Meetings could be improved with more collaborative features and an archive of information like appointments and discussions that can be shared with everybody."

"It could be more secure."

"It would be nice if there were more integrations available."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cisco TelePresence license is expensive and should be reduced. There is only a cost for the license and it is annually."

"The pricing is expensive, therefore I rate it an eight out of ten."

"I will rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"The price of Cisco Telepresence is high, especially in Brazil. However, the quality of the product justifies the cost."

"We used high definition, 1080p, but again, it required license purchases. For example, with three licenses (TP licenses), each allowing one 1080p screen, if I had six participants, I'd need to lower the resolution to 720p or lower to accommodate more participants. More licenses meant more cost."

"Pricing is very competitive because it didn't change much since they were already in the market when other players came in."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

University

14%

Government

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco TelePresence?

It was stable. So, I would rate the stability a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco TelePresence?

Cisco TelePresence could improve its integration capabilities. As for additional features, I would like to see an improved ceiling microphone solution in the next versions.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Cisco TelePresence?

I recommend it to clients and would rate it 10 out of 10.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Webex Meetings with AT&T?

We initially started the virtual meetings at AT&T with an internal solution,and then many new players came into the market, like XOAM and Skype. We evaluated the solution and what we currently ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Webex Meetings with AT&T?

I would recommend it since it was easy for us to use and integrate. The easy installation and the capabilities to expand and manage many users were top priorities in making the decision and recomme...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webex Meetings with AT&T?

Pricing is very competitive because it didn't change much since they were already in the market when other players came in.

See all answers

Comparisons

Webex vs Cisco TelePresence

Compared 40% of the time

Polycom RealPresence Clariti vs Cisco TelePresence

Compared 30% of the time

Polycom RealPresence Desktop vs Cisco TelePresence

Compared 30% of the time

More Cisco TelePresence Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Virtual Meetings

March 2025

Download Cisco TelePresence product report

Buyer's Guide

Virtual Meetings

March 2025

Download Webex Meetings with AT&T product report

Also Known As

TelePresence

AT&T Webex Meetings, Cisco Webex Meetings with AT&T

Overview

Cisco TelePresence Server brings multiparty video to unified communications deployments. Its flexible video, audio, and content-sharing capabilities allow users to participate in video conferences with multiple parties. Users can easily create, launch, and join meetings using standards-based video endpoints. Or their mobile devices or Cisco WebEx clients. Or even third-party video endpoints. The server provides high-quality, standards-based video conferencing for mobile, desktop, and room systems.

Cisco

Webex Meetings with AT&T is an enterprise-level collaboration platform. This solution provides teams with access to a range of industry-leading features, including the ability to host rich meetings with video, audio and chat, share files, present documents, and much more.

AT&T

Sample Customers

Afni, AGCO, Bellevue, Came Group, Children's Hospital of Orange County (CHOC Children's), Del Papa Distributing, Instituto Zaldivar, ING Bank, Moffitt Cancer Center, Park Nicollet, Pentana Solutions Australia, San Jose State University, Sub-Zero Wolf, Transwestern and Metropolis Investment Holdings, Vital Images

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Cisco TelePresence vs. Webex Meetings with AT&T

March 2025

Free Report: Cisco TelePresence vs. Webex Meetings with AT&T

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco TelePresence vs. Webex Meetings with AT&T and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco TelePresence vs. Webex Meetings with AT&T report.

See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.

We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.