Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CloudBees vs Tekton comparison

CloudBees and Google are both solutions in the Build Automation category. CloudBees is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.3, while Google is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.8. CloudBees holds a 1.0% mindshare in BA, compared to Google’s 12.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CloudBees users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Google users who would recommend it.
CloudBees
Read 20 CloudBees reviews
  • 716 Views
  • 142 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Tekton
Read 36 Tekton reviews
  • 5,137 Views
  • 3,266 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Tekton and CloudBees are contenders in the CI/CD space. Tekton's compatibility with Kubernetes gives it an advantage in scalability and cloud-native integration.

Features: Tekton offers seamless integration with Kubernetes, allowing extensive customizations and flexibility in task and pipeline creation. Its lightweight, serverless architecture supports scalability and high compatibility with OpenShift environments. CloudBees provides advanced security features, application delivery automation, and extensive integration with various tools. It is known for its audit capabilities, detailed deployment visibility, and robust pipeline management, supporting complex operations.

Room for Improvement: Tekton requires in-depth Kubernetes knowledge and lacks a mature dashboard, detailed documentation, and sufficient integration capabilities, impacting user-friendliness. CloudBees could enhance the speed of operations, improve GUI intuitiveness, and offer better integration with external tools. It also relies heavily on proprietary solutions, which may slow innovation compared to open-source alternatives.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tekton, as an open-source tool, integrates well with Kubernetes and benefits from Red Hat support, smoothing its deployment in OpenShift. However, community-driven technical support can lead to slower response times. CloudBees provides strong support for both public and private cloud settings and meets enterprise needs but sometimes experiences infrastructure-related challenges affecting deployment efficiency.

Pricing and ROI: Tekton is open-source, eliminating licensing costs and reducing operational costs due to its lower resource requirements, offering significant ROI in Kubernetes and OpenShift environments. It shows substantial cost savings compared to tools like Jenkins. CloudBees, despite being costly, provides ROI justified by its security features and extensive integrations that align with enterprise requirements, offsetting its higher price through its comprehensive features.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed CloudBees vs. Tekton Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
CloudBees vs. Tekton
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 842,296 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.5
CloudBees licensing offers robust ROI with security, support, and automation, enhancing efficiency and trust in production environments.
Sentiment score
7.9
Tekton enhances efficiency and cuts costs by optimizing Kubernetes deployment, though resource duplication may increase expenses.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.9
CloudBees support gets mixed reviews, often praised for responsiveness but criticized for frequent issues and plugin upgrade suggestions.
Sentiment score
6.8
Red Hat's Tekton support is praised for integration and resources, despite slow technical responses, with community forums aiding users.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
CloudBees efficiently supports scalable multi-environment operations, integrating with architectures like Kubernetes, despite notable resource consumption.
Sentiment score
7.0
Tekton scales effectively with Kubernetes, handling multiple pipelines and reducing costs but requires customization for optimal resource management.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.6
CloudBees is generally stable but can encounter issues during upgrades, plugin compatibility, and in complex server environments.
Sentiment score
7.2
Tekton is stable and efficient on Kubernetes, with minor configuration issues, excelling in autoscaling and resource management.
 

Room For Improvement

Users seek CloudBees improvements in speed, integration, GUI, plugins, authentication, reliability, AI integration, and standardized templates.
Tekton needs better integration, improved UI, documentation, scalability, and security, with easier YAML configuration and enhanced debugging support.
 

Setup Cost

Enterprises favor CloudBees for its core product and security features, accepting high costs due to substantial benefits.
Tekton is a cost-effective open-source tool reducing expenses compared to licensed alternatives, despite potential cloud-related costs.
 

Valuable Features

CloudBees enhances CI/CD efficiency with scalability, tool integration, advanced security, cloud support, and seamless Jenkins management.
Tekton enhances CI/CD efficiency with Kubernetes integration, customizable pipelines, and seamless automation, ideal for Kubernetes-centric teams.
 

Categories and Ranking

CloudBees
Ranking in Build Automation
7th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Configuration Management (12th), Value Stream Management Software (3rd), DevSecOps (5th)
Tekton
Ranking in Build Automation
2nd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
36
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of CloudBees is 1.0%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tekton is 12.1%, up from 10.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Build Automation
 

Featured Reviews

YashBrahmani - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers a clear visualization and overview of workflows and helpful in managing CI/CD processes
Improvement in the sense that they can do better in terms of management of logs and stuff like that because the console logs are very extensive, and that causes a lot of storage issues. That is one of the things which is there. Also, with respect to the traditional platform and the modern platform, many things have upgraded, and it has quite improved. But when we talk about the performance of the agents, it’s still very crucial because it’s not up to par. It takes a lot of time to provision the agent and to finish the build because of the SSH connection and the JNLP connection. Due to that, sometimes the agent doesn’t get provisioned. Those are some of the blockers that meet up the time in terms of administering the instance.
Read full review
AjayKrishna - PeerSpot reviewer
If you're dealing with many applications and need a reliable, scalable, and efficient system, I'd recommend this solution
Tekton's most important feature is its cloud-native nature. Unlike Jenkins, which may not scale as efficiently, Tekton's CI pipeline can automatically scale up to handle increased workload demands without needing manual adjustments. Another important aspect is the level of customization offered by Tekton. Each task in the CI pipeline can be customized independently, allowing developers to write code in various languages like shell scripting, Java, or Python and incorporate them into the pipeline as needed. This level of abstraction and customization greatly benefits developers in creating efficient CI pipelines. Also, it can be challenging to understand the logs and troubleshoot issues without clear guidance. It's not always easy to reach technical support and get immediate answers. In my opinion, improvement in this area would be beneficial.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
24%
Legal Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
23%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CloudBees?
There are connection issues with CloudBees, specifically between Sybase and CloudBees. We often encounter connection problems, and there are issues with the pipelines.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for CloudBees?
We use CloudBees for deploying the code in higher environments, such as QA, C2, staging, and production.
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering CloudBees?
I would recommend CloudBees to others because building jobs is much easier than with other solutions.
See all answers
How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?
When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...
See all answers
What do you like most about Tekton?
Its seamless integration with Kubernetes, being built on top of it and utilizing Custom Resource Definitions, ensures a smooth experience within Kubernetes environments exclusively.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Tekton?
Regarding areas for improvement in Tekton, I have not encountered significant issues. It works well for our use case. However, incorporating AI could be a potential enhancement in the future.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

GitLab vs CloudBees Logo
GitLab vs CloudBees
Compared 55% of the time
Harness vs CloudBees Logo
Harness vs CloudBees
Compared 29% of the time
More CloudBees Competitors
GitHub Actions vs Tekton Logo
GitHub Actions vs Tekton
Compared 34% of the time
GitLab vs Tekton Logo
GitLab vs Tekton
Compared 25% of the time
Harness vs Tekton Logo
Harness vs Tekton
Compared 8% of the time
Jenkins vs Tekton Logo
Jenkins vs Tekton
Compared 6% of the time
Buildkite vs Tekton Logo
Buildkite vs Tekton
Compared 1% of the time
More Tekton Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
CloudBees
March 2025
CloudBees reportDownload CloudBees product report
Buyer's Guide
Tekton
March 2025
Tekton reportDownload Tekton product report
 

Overview

CloudBees DevOptics is a robust software utilized primarily to enhance CI/CD processes by offering real-time visibility into Jenkins pipelines. It facilitates effective monitoring, incident management, and decision-making through comprehensive data analysis. Users value its features like DevOps performance metrics and seamless tool integration, leading to improved operational efficiency and productivity in organizations.

CloudBees

Tekton is a powerful yet flexible Kubernetes-native open-source framework for creating continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) systems. It lets you build, test, and deploy across multiple cloud providers or on-premises systems by abstracting away the underlying implementation details.

Google
 

Sample Customers

Capital One, PEGA, vistaprint, HSBC, BOSCH, Starbucks Coffee
The Home Depot, PayPal, Target, HSBC, McKesson, Oncology Venture
Buyer's Guide
CloudBees vs. Tekton
March 2025
Free Report: CloudBees vs. Tekton
Find out what your peers are saying about CloudBees vs. Tekton and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our CloudBees vs. Tekton report.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.