Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CloudBees vs Harness comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.3
CloudBees support gets mixed reviews, often praised for responsiveness but criticized for frequent issues and plugin upgrade suggestions.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
6.5
Users seek CloudBees improvements in speed, integration, GUI, plugins, authentication, reliability, AI integration, and standardized templates.
No sentiment score available
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
CloudBees efficiently supports scalable multi-environment operations, integrating with architectures like Kubernetes, despite notable resource consumption.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
6.7
Enterprises favor CloudBees for its core product and security features, accepting high costs due to substantial benefits.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.1
CloudBees is generally stable but can encounter issues during upgrades, plugin compatibility, and in complex server environments.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.4
CloudBees enhances CI/CD efficiency with scalability, tool integration, advanced security, cloud support, and seamless Jenkins management.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

CloudBees
Ranking in Build Automation
7th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Configuration Management (12th), Value Stream Management Software (3rd), DevSecOps (5th)
Harness
Ranking in Build Automation
12th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (30th), Cloud Cost Management (15th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of CloudBees is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Harness is 5.0%, up from 4.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Build Automation
 

Featured Reviews

YashBrahmani - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers a clear visualization and overview of workflows and helpful in managing CI/CD processes
Improvement in the sense that they can do better in terms of management of logs and stuff like that because the console logs are very extensive, and that causes a lot of storage issues. That is one of the things which is there. Also, with respect to the traditional platform and the modern platform, many things have upgraded, and it has quite improved. But when we talk about the performance of the agents, it’s still very crucial because it’s not up to par. It takes a lot of time to provision the agent and to finish the build because of the SSH connection and the JNLP connection. Due to that, sometimes the agent doesn’t get provisioned. Those are some of the blockers that meet up the time in terms of administering the instance.
Misbah Mohammed Kollathodi - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides a good graphical interface, but the initial setup process needs improvement
The platform's initial setup process could be simplified. Additionally, security features and capabilities for understanding vulnerabilities within the application could be enhanced directly from the tool. There's also room for improvement in debugging pipeline issues, which can sometimes become complex. Limitations regarding reconciliation features and support for certain parts of the infrastructure should also be addressed.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
27%
Manufacturing Company
17%
Legal Firm
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
35%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CloudBees?
There are connection issues with CloudBees, specifically between Sybase and CloudBees. We often encounter connection problems, and there are issues with the pipelines.
What is your primary use case for CloudBees?
We use CloudBees for deploying the code in higher environments, such as QA, C2, staging, and production.
What advice do you have for others considering CloudBees?
I would recommend CloudBees to others because building jobs is much easier than with other solutions.
What do you like most about Harness?
It's a highly customizable DevOps tool.
What needs improvement with Harness?
Even with automation, there's a requirement for manual change requests for approvals. If this is corrected, we could have a totally automated pipeline. Otherwise, we need to use GitLab or GitOps to...
What is your primary use case for Harness?
We use Harness as a deployment tool. It allows us to define environments like OpenShift or Kubernetes or Linux servers. It automates the pipeline system where users can trigger with the master bran...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Armory
 

Learn More

Video not available
Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Capital One, PEGA, vistaprint, HSBC, BOSCH, Starbucks Coffee
Linedata, Openbank, Home Depot, Advanced
Find out what your peers are saying about CloudBees vs. Harness and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.