Cloudian HyperStore vs Pure Storage FlashBlade comparison

Cloudian and Pure Storage are both solutions in the File and Object Storage category. Cloudian is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.0, while Pure Storage is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.0. Cloudian holds a 3.0% mindshare in FaOS, compared to Pure Storage’s 6.4% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of Cloudian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Pure Storage users who would recommend it.

Cloudian HyperStore

Read 4 Cloudian HyperStore reviews

2,141 Views
1,654 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Pure Storage FlashBlade

Read 37 Pure Storage FlashBlade reviews

4,516 Views
3,246 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Cloudian HyperStore

Pure Storage FlashBlade

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Cloudian HyperStore and Pure Storage FlashBlade compete in the data storage solutions market, each offering unique advantages. Cloudian HyperStore leads with affordable pricing and customer support, ideal for budget-conscious enterprises, whereas Pure Storage FlashBlade offers advanced functionality through its robust capabilities.

Features: Cloudian HyperStore provides scalable object storage, Amazon S3 compatibility, and effective data management. Pure Storage FlashBlade offers rapid data processing, advanced analytics, and efficient storage for complex workloads.

Room for Improvement: Cloudian HyperStore could improve its feature-rich capabilities and speed relative to FlashBlade. Enhancing analytics and processing power would also be beneficial. Pure Storage FlashBlade could work on reducing setup complexity, cost-effectiveness, and customer support accessibility for easier adoption.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cloudian HyperStore integrates seamlessly with existing infrastructures and offers extensive customer support, making deployment straightforward. Pure Storage FlashBlade, though more complex to set up, provides high-caliber professional services during deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Cloudian HyperStore features low entry setup costs, providing a strong value proposition and quick ROI. Pure Storage FlashBlade requires higher initial investment but delivers enhanced performance benefits, potentially offering significant long-term ROI for performance-driven clients.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloudian HyperStore vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Cloudian HyperStore vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Cloudian HyperStore

Ranking in File and Object Storage

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Pure Storage FlashBlade

Ranking in File and Object Storage

6th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

All-Flash Storage (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the File and Object Storage category, the mindshare of Cloudian HyperStore is 3.0%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pure Storage FlashBlade is 6.4%, up from 5.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

File and Object Storage

Featured Reviews

Kiran Rajanna

Senior Solutions Architect and Cloud Security Consultant at Cgi Deutschland KG

A seamless solution offering data encryption, quality service, and security encryption

Cloudian HyperStore needs to incorporate AI and predictive analysis. It would be helpful if the solution could analyze and predict how to manage data better. The end users should not have access to protected documents. They should be able to drop the documents. The capacity management dashboard can be better. We also want two-factor authentication using Google Authenticator or Microsoft Authenticator as MFA. Hence, the user would access the console not just by logging in with a password and username but with third-party applications as well.

Read full review

Eric Black

Solutions Architect at Recovery Point Systems

The ability to leverage multi-tenancy along with immutability is a huge benefit for us

The only thing I feel FlashBlade is missing is the SOS API. If it had SOS API, that would put it well over the top. Veeam Backup specifically has started to streamline their API, and they are doing that with SOS API. They have optimized it. Any of the S3 devices out there that support this SOS API can have far more API calls at once. On our side, that translates to better restoration. With SOS API, it can leverage far more restorations at a single given time or read from the device in simple terms. That results in maximizing the output and throughput from the device itself.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is very durable and that is particularly important."

"The tool has S3 capability. Its scalability is excellent. From a security and encryption perspective, the solution supports SSL encryption. It is a seamless solution offering data encryption, quality service, and security encryption."

"The most valuable features are its scalability and Amazon S3 compatibility because we can move back and forth with a hybrid cloud."

"The cost was the main reason we chose to use this solution."

"Among its most appealing features are its ease of handling and minimal maintenance requirements."

"It has also helped to simplify storage for us in the way that it's easy to manage. Their automatic monitoring really helps when things break or are about to break. They see a problem coming and alert us even before our own system does."

"I like its size. It is smaller than the other competitors. We can plug in many blades, and we can have data up to one terabyte."

"It is very easy to use, and it is very fast."

"The most valuable features include the ease of implementation, ease of use and the speed that you can do backup and recovery on."

"The initial setup was straightforward. If you know how to plug in power and network you're pretty much qualified. They were on site to configure the network, the box to fit into our network architecture. Other than that, we self-managed from there."

"We have seen a reduction in the total cost of ownership by around 20%."

"The snapshots, replication, and the ability to have immutable blades are the most valuable features. You're putting data snapshots out in those blades, and they cannot be touched. Its performance is great."

More Pure Storage FlashBlade pros

Cons

"It is a cloud-based environment and at times, it is not very simple to use."

"Cloudian HyperStore needs to incorporate AI and predictive analysis. It would be helpful if the solution could analyze and predict how to manage data better. The end users should not have access to protected documents. They should be able to drop the documents. The capacity management dashboard can be better. We also want two-factor authentication using Google Authenticator or Microsoft Authenticator as MFA. Hence, the user would access the console not just by logging in with a password and username but with third-party applications as well."

"As it is an S3 solution with the same protocol as the one we have with AWS, having better integration with AWS will be beneficial."

"It would be beneficial if the layer could support the S3 protocol and be container ready in the next release."

"There could be improvements in public cloud integration."

"File storage needs a lot of improvement. Mainframe connectivity also needs improvement because it requires additional components to be integrated with Pure Storage FlashBlade. If you want to keep your backup data, then this becomes an even more expensive solution because Pure Storage FlashBlade will not be able to meet your backup needs."

"Commvault has mainly driven the Analytics, providing data and reports. However, the product has room for improvement, especially regarding storage analytics. Upgrading firmware has caused issues, requiring feature disabling to revert to traditional backups. The firmware upgrades sometimes affect Commvault backups."

"The feature that we're waiting on is better integration with the cell services."

"I would like to see more monitoring capability included in the next release of this solution."

"It's on the expensive side, as expected for a niche product."

"On our dedupe during our initial buy, we were expecting a number a little higher like 4x. However, we are getting about 3.6. While it is close enough, it doesn't quite hit the numbers. So, this has been a challenge."

More Pure Storage FlashBlade cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our fees are approximately half a dollar per gigabyte."

"The solution is cheap."

"I have seen ROI. It has allowed me to increase the density of my VMs without having to purchase anything additional."

"The price of this solution could be made more affordable."

"The price could be cheaper."

"It is within reason for what you get. From what we have found comparing it to other vendors, it is in the same range as others. Given the choice, we would definitely redeploy it based on the cost."

"In my opinion, we have paid the right price for the product. I don't think that it is too much or too little."

"Our customers have seen a reduction in TCO."

"Our licensing is renewed annually."

"We used a reseller for the purchase."

More Pure Storage FlashBlade pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

33%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

38%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cloudian HyperStore?

The tool has S3 capability. Its scalability is excellent. From a security and encryption perspective, the solution supports SSL encryption. It is a seamless solution offering data encryption, quali...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cloudian HyperStore?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cloudian HyperStore?

We use the product to stage timesheets.

See all answers

What do you like most about Pure Storage FlashBlade?

The tool's most valuable feature is its fast performance, especially in handling snapshots. It helps during power outages when we need to quickly move data between different data centers. It ensure...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pure Storage FlashBlade?

The pricing for FlashBlade is between cheap and moderate. FlashBlade is worth the money due to the experience and performance it delivers, including quick response times.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Pure Storage FlashBlade?

Its configuration should be easier. There should be easier language for the configuration.

See all answers

Comparisons

MinIO vs Cloudian HyperStore

Compared 26% of the time

Scality RING vs Cloudian HyperStore

Compared 19% of the time

Red Hat Ceph Storage vs Cloudian HyperStore

Compared 13% of the time

Dell ECS vs Cloudian HyperStore

Compared 9% of the time

Object First Ootbi vs Cloudian HyperStore

Compared 3% of the time

More Cloudian HyperStore Competitors

Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs Pure Storage FlashBlade

Compared 19% of the time

VAST Data vs Pure Storage FlashBlade

Compared 14% of the time

Red Hat Ceph Storage vs Pure Storage FlashBlade

Compared 12% of the time

MinIO vs Pure Storage FlashBlade

Compared 11% of the time

Pure Storage FlashArray vs Pure Storage FlashBlade

Compared 8% of the time

More Pure Storage FlashBlade Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

File and Object Storage

November 2024

Download Cloudian HyperStore product report

Buyer's Guide

Pure Storage FlashBlade

December 2024

Download Pure Storage FlashBlade product report

Also Known As

HyperStore, Cloudian HyperStore Object Storage, HyperStore Object Storage

No data available

Learn More

Cloudian

Pure Storage

Overview

Cloudian HyperStore lets you start small and grow to hundreds of petabytes on-premises simply by adding nodes. Leverage the proven interoperability of the industry’s only 100% native S3 API.

FlashBlade is the industry’s most advanced scale-out storage for unstructured data, powered by a modern, massively parallel architecture to consolidate complex data silos (like backup appliances and data lakes) and accelerate tomorrow’s discoveries and insights.

Sample Customers

NTT Communications, Casale, Kumo

ServiceNow, Mercedes-AMG Petronas Motorsport, Dominos, Man AHL

Buyer's Guide

Cloudian HyperStore vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade

December 2024

Free Report: Cloudian HyperStore vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade

Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudian HyperStore vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cloudian HyperStore vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade report.

See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.

We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.