CockroachDB vs OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) comparison

The compared Cockroach and OpenText solutions aren't in the same category. Cockroach is ranked #11 in SQL , with an average rating of 8.4, and holds a 4.1% mindshare in the category. OpenText is ranked #6 in Data Warehouse , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 8.0% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Cockroach users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

CockroachDB

Read 12 CockroachDB reviews

2,405 Views
2,237 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

OpenText Analytics Database...

Read 86 OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) reviews

4,560 Views
1,915 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

CockroachDB

OpenText Analytics Database...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CockroachDB and OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Relational Databases Tools Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Relational Databases Tools

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CockroachDB

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Relational Databases Tools (11th)

OpenText Analytics Database...

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Warehouse (6th), Cloud Data Warehouse (11th)

Mindshare comparison

CockroachDB and OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. CockroachDB is designed for Relational Databases Tools and holds a mindshare of 4.1%, up 2.7% compared to last year.
OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica), on the other hand, focuses on Data Warehouse, holds 8.0% mindshare, down 9.1% since last year.

Relational Databases Tools

Data Warehouse

Featured Reviews

Dang Quy Tai

Student at Univerzita obrany

Geo-replication benefits with distributed setup and a helpful AI support chatbot

I am studying how to deploy CockroachDB and YugaByteDB, and learning some basic information about them. I am testing these databases as part of my school application to find a suitable database for our applications. Currently, I am using PostgreSQL, however, I want to try some distributed databases…

Read full review

T Venkatesh

Deputy Manager at ICICIBANK Ltd

Processes query faster through multiple systems simultaneously, but it could support different data types

We use the solution for various tasks, including preparing data marts and generating offers. It helps extract data based on rules from the policy team and provides insights to enhance business operations. We also analyze transactions to target customers and improve business performance The…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is node syncing, which takes only 0.54 milliseconds."

"The most valuable features of the solution are its resiliency features and the geo-partitioning capabilities."

"I use CockroachDB to test big data samples and to create the best structure for databases. We have four users and required 10 people for deployment and maintenance."

"The most valuable feature is that CockroachDB is a distributed database, which can deploy nodes running in different regions."

"What I like best is its ability to solve data residency issues. The main advantage is auto geo partitioning, built into the product. This means we don't have to spin up separate servers in each region, which would be much more costly."

"The product has valuable security features."

"The subset of SQL that my client is using is completely supported."

"The initial setup and deployment are simple."

More CockroachDB pros

"Integrated R and geospatial functions are helping us improve efficiency and explore new revenue streams. "

"Vertica has a few features that I like. From an architecture standpoint, they have separated compute and storage. So you have low-cost object storage for primary storage and the ability to have several sub-clusters working off the same ObjectStore. So it provides workload isolation."

"The solution has great capabilities. The tool that instructs the internal database forward is easy to use and is very powerful."

"Vertica gives knowledgeable users and DBAs excellent tools for tuning."

"I like the projection feature, which increases query performance."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"The solution was executed quite quickly due to its columnar storage underground, which is the most valuable feature of our company"

"Its analytics has enabled Pythian's clients to get the business insights as quick as they wanted. Its lower maintenance has also improved the ROI."

More OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) pros

Cons

"We are looking for more features to support distributed high availability and geo-partitioning."

"CockroachDB needs to improve store processes."

"I think the engine itself could be improved. If you miss a partition key, it should be able to be modeled. This is where AI could be really helpful. For example, if a user is from Australia, the system should know to look for their data there first instead of searching in the US or another continent."

"Cockroach does not support all types of protocols. I need to improve it myself to support a CouchDB on my network."

"I find the serverless offer a bit confusing."

"The closer they can make CockroachDB to being completely compatible with Postgres, the better. It's almost compatible, but not completely. If it was, it would be nice to just be able to use Postgres libraries without any fiddling."

"The initial setup and pricing could be improved."

"The product must improve its disaster recovery features."

More CockroachDB cons

"Some of our small to medium-sized customers would like to see containerization and flexibility from the deployment standpoint."

"The geospatial functionality could be designed better."

"I believe the installation process could be streamlined."

"Pricing could be more competitive."

"The integration of this solution with ODI could be improved."

"Performance of management of metadata layer (database catalog) needs improvement. We still have to have smaller customers on PostgreSQL; Vertica cannot manage thousands of schemata."

"If you do not utilize the tuning tools like projections, encoding, partitions, and statistics, then performance and scalability will suffer."

"It should provide a GUI interface for data management and tuning."

More OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is good but can be made cheaper. I would rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"The platform is affordable even for the enterprise version. It provides value for investment in terms of performance."

"The solution's pricing is not cheap. However, the good thing is that customers are willing to pay for it if they want it."

"I've used CockroachDB at a small scale on the free accounts because we are only testing."

"The product's price depends on the user's company and the contract model they enter into with CockroachDB. Depending on the contract model one enters into with CockroachDB, the product may or may not be expensive."

"The price of Vertica is less expensive than some competitors, such as Teradata."

"Vertica is an expensive tool."

"The pricing for this solution is very reasonable compared to other vendors."

"It is fast to purchase through the AWS Marketplace."

"The pricing and licensing depend on the size of your environment and the zone where you want to implement."

"The pricing could improve, it is a little expensive."

"The solution is relatively cost-effective."

"Work with a vendor, if possible, and take advantage of more aggressive discounts at mid-fiscal year (April) and fiscal year-end (October)."

More OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

34%

Computer Software Company

13%

Educational Organization

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CockroachDB?

The subset of SQL that my client is using is completely supported.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CockroachDB?

I would like CockroachDB to have more compatibility with PostgreSQL, especially with the connection string and technical integrations.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CockroachDB?

See all answers

What do you like most about Vertica?

Vertica is easy to use and provides really high performance, stability, and scalability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Vertica?

The solution is relatively cost-effective. Pricing and licensing are reasonable compared to other solutions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Vertica?

The product could improve by adding support for a wider variety of data types and enhancing features to better compete with other databases.

See all answers

Comparisons

Neon vs CockroachDB

Compared 26% of the time

Citus Data vs CockroachDB

Compared 15% of the time

YugabyteDB vs CockroachDB

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle Database vs CockroachDB

Compared 9% of the time

SingleStore vs CockroachDB

Compared 8% of the time

More CockroachDB Competitors

SQL Server vs OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica)

Compared 15% of the time

Teradata vs OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica)

Compared 11% of the time

BigQuery vs OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica)

Compared 9% of the time

Snowflake vs OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica)

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle Exadata vs OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica)

Compared 8% of the time

More OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CockroachDB

July 2025

Download CockroachDB product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica)

June 2025

OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) report

Download OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus Vertica, HPE Vertica, HPE Vertica on Demand

Overview

CockroachDB is a distributed SQL database built on a transactional and strongly-consistent key-value store. It scales horizontally; survives disk, machine, rack, and even datacenter failures with minimal latency disruption and no manual intervention; supports strongly-consistent ACID transactions; and provides a familiar SQL API for structuring, manipulating, and querying data.

CockroachDB is inspired by Google’s Spanner and F1 technologies, and it’s completely open source.

Cockroach

OpenText Analytics Database Vertica is known for its fast data loading and efficient query processing, providing scalability and user-friendliness with a low cost per TB. It supports large data volumes with OLAP, clustering, and parallel ingestion capabilities.

OpenText Analytics Database Vertica is designed to handle substantial data volumes with a focus on speed and efficient storage through its columnar architecture. It offers advanced performance features like workload isolation and compression, ensuring flexibility and high availability. The database is optimized for scalable data management, supporting data scientists and analysts with real-time reporting and analytics. Its architecture is built to facilitate hybrid deployments on-premises or within cloud environments, integrating seamlessly with business intelligence tools like Tableau. However, challenges such as improved transactional capabilities, optimized delete processes, and better real-time loading need addressing.

What features define OpenText Analytics Database Vertica?

Fast Data Loading: Quickly ingests large data volumes.
Columnar Storage: Optimizes storage efficiency and speed.
OLAP Support: Provides robust analytics capabilities.
Advanced Compression: Enhances storage efficiency and performance.
Parallel Data Ingestion: Enables faster data processing.
Fault Tolerance: Ensures high availability and reliability.

What benefits should users expect?

Cost Efficiency: Low cost per TB is advantageous.
Scalability: Accommodates growing data needs seamlessly.
Integration Flexibility: Works well with BI tools like Tableau.
Real-Time Reporting: Delivers immediate insights for decision-making.

OpenText Analytics Database Vertica's implementation spans industries such as finance, healthcare, and telecommunications. It serves as a central data warehouse offering scalable management, high-speed processing, and geospatial functions. Companies benefit from its capacity to integrate machine learning and operational reporting, enhancing analytical capabilities.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Baidu, Kindred, Tierion, Heroic Labs, Gorgias

Cerner, Game Show Network Game, Guess by Marciano, Supercell, Etsy, Nascar, Empirix, adMarketplace, and Cardlytics.

Buyer's Guide

Relational Databases Tools

July 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases Tools. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.