Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Code42 Incydr vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Code42 Incydr's customer service is highly praised for its responsiveness, professionalism, clear communication, expert support, and comprehensive resources.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Code42 Incydr could enhance support, efficiency, and features, especially for newcomers and those relying on content-specific filtering.
No sentiment score available
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Code42 Incydr is highly scalable and integrates seamlessly, with minor setup issues but reliable performance for growing and established businesses.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Code42 Incydr is highly reliable and stable, with users rarely encountering any issues, bugs, crashes, or glitches.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Code42 Incydr is user-friendly, offers continuous backups, excellent visibility for remote workforces, and customizable risk-scoring with minimal resource use.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

Code42 Incydr
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
53rd
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
78
Ranking in other categories
Backup and Recovery (55th), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (26th)
Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
34th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (45th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Code42 Incydr is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is 1.3%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
 

Featured Reviews

Chuck_Mackey - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides comprehensive visibility and protection, helps in identifying the gaps in security, and comes with excellent onboarding support
In a couple of instances, we had a little bit of trouble in getting it distributed throughout the organization. We ultimately managed to do it, but they talk about it being a pretty simple process, and it became a little laborious. It would just turn away. The agents were not being distributed. It was just churning and churning and churning. When we were looking for specific categories of data, it was getting bogged down, but that was not even so much Code42, although some of it was their issue. It really has to do with the overall infrastructure and what the organization is prepared to do. If the infrastructure or the networking is a little hinky or you don't have a really finely tuned network infrastructure environment and your patches aren't up to date on your servers and your endpoints, it could get a little sticky. Other than that, it was okay. We really didn't have much problem beyond that. It took a couple of days to sort that out, but it was no big deal.
AtulChaurasia - PeerSpot reviewer
Scalable platform with intuitive features for detecting malicious files
The initial setup process is straightforward. We have to install the agent, create a package, and deploy it on servers. It has a prebuilt console managed by the cloud team of Cybereason. We don't have to worry about the console and concentrate on endpoint implementation. It takes ten days to deploy it on 10,000 devices.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Retailer
7%
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Code42 Next-Gen DLP?
Risk factors can be adjusted for all intricate details.
What advice do you have for others considering Code42 Next-Gen DLP?
If you come with the perception that this solution uses the same policies that are used in traditional DLP products, you might find Code42 doesn't work for you. You have to adapt to their philosoph...
What needs improvement with Code42 Incydr?
The solution has been designed for a different approach than the one followed by other DLP solutions in the market. Most of us who come from the mindset of filtering out incidents using a content-s...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?
Comparison with other products showed it be cheaper than some larger competitors. Set up cost for us were cheaper as we already had users experienced with the product in other business units. Initi...
What is your primary use case for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?
We use the product for enhancing security postures by leveraging behavioral analytics and security engines effectively minimizing false positives and detecting threats.
 

Also Known As

Code42 Next-Gen DLP, Code42 Next-Gen Data Loss Protection, Code42 Forensic File Search, Code42 Backup + Restore
Cybereason EDR, Cybereason Deep Detect & Respond
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Adobe, Okta, Samsung, Taylormade, Boston University, Lending Club, North Highland, Stanford University, Ping Identity, Qualcomm, Pandora.
Lockheed Martin, Spark Capital, DocuSign, Softbank Capital
Find out what your peers are saying about Code42 Incydr vs. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.