CodeSonar vs Semgrep comparison

CodeSecure and Semgrep are both solutions in the Static Code Analysis category. CodeSecure is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.5, while Semgrep is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0. CodeSecure holds a 6.4% mindshare in SCAS, compared to Semgrep’s 10.0% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of CodeSecure users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Semgrep users who would recommend it.

CodeSonar

Read 7 CodeSonar reviews

574 Views
363 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Semgrep

Read 1 Semgrep review

349 Views
320 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CodeSonar

Semgrep

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CodeSonar and Semgrep based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, Checkmarx, OpenText and others in Static Code Analysis.

To learn more, read our detailed Static Code Analysis Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Static Code Analysis

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

CodeSonar

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (30th)

Semgrep

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (29th), Supply Chain Management Software (3rd), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Static Code Analysis category, the mindshare of CodeSonar is 6.4%, down from 7.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Semgrep is 10.0%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Code Analysis

Featured Reviews

Mathieu ALBRESPY

Intigration Developer at ez-Wheel

Nice interface, quick to deploy, and easy to expand

This is the first time I've used this kind of software. It was the only one we could apply to analyze with MISRA rules. At my new company, I tried to use Klocwork. I tried to use it, just once so I cannot compare it exactly with CodeSonar. I also have a plugin for my Visual Studio and I try to make it work. It's not easy, however, I don't think that we have this kind of functionality with CodeSonar. It can do some incremental analysis. However, since this feature is also available on CodeSonar, it would be a good idea to have a plugin on Visual Studio just to have a quick analysis.

Read full review

Henry Mwawai

Security Consultant | Application Security at Jowatechs

Automated code reviews and good scalability with custom rule adaptability

We use Semgrep to check custom user pipelines and test their claims for any vulnerabilities. We process the code by passing it through the testing process for any operability issues before sending feedback to the developers and providing the final product. This is part of the static testing…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool is very good for detecting memory leaks."

"There is nice functionality for code surfing and browsing."

"The most valuable features of CodeSonar were all the categorized classes provided, and reports of future bugs which might occur in the production code. Additionally, I found the buffer overflow and underflow useful."

"CodeSonar’s most valuable feature is finding security threats."

"The most valuable feature of CodeSonar is the catching of dead code. It is helpful."

"What I like best about CodeSonar is that it has fantastic speed, analysis and configuration times. Its detection of all runtime errors is also very good, though there were times it missed a few. The configuration of logs by CodeSonar is also very fantastic which I've not seen anywhere else. I also like the GUI interface of CodeSonar because it's very user friendly and the tool also shows very precise logs and results."

"It has been able to scale."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to write our custom rules."

Cons

"The scanning tool for core architecture could be improved."

"In terms of areas for improvement, the use case for CodeSonar was good, but compared to other tools, it seems CodeSonar isn't a sound static analysis tool, and this is a major con I've seen from it. Right now, in the market, people prefer sound static analysis tools, so I would have preferred if CodeSonar was developed into a sound static analysis tool formally, in terms of its algorithms, so then you can see it extensively used in the market because at the moment, here in India, only fifty to sixty customers use CodeSonar. If the product is developed into a sound static analysis tool, it could compete with Polyspace, and from its current fifty customers, that number could go up to a hundred."

"It was expensive."

"In a future release, the solution should upgrade itself to the current trends and differentiate between the languages. If there are any classifications that can be set for these programming languages that would be helpful rather than having everything in the generic category."

"There could be a shared licensing model for the users."

"CodeSonar could improve by having better coding rules so we did not have to use another solution, such as MISRA C."

"It would be beneficial for the solution to include code standards and additional functionality for security."

"There should be more information on how to acquire the system, catering to beginners in application security, to make it more user-friendly."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The application’s pricing is high compared to other tools."

"Our organization purchased a license to use the solution."

"Pricing is a bit costly."

"The solution's price depends on the number of licenses needed and the source code for the project."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Code Analysis solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

26%

Computer Software Company

14%

University

10%

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Media Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CodeSonar?

CodeSonar’s most valuable feature is finding security threats.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CodeSonar?

The application’s pricing is high compared to other tools. I rate its pricing a four out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CodeSonar?

Our license model allows one user per license. Currently, we have limitations for VPN profiles. We can’t share the key with other users. There could be a shared licensing model for the users. It wi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Semgrep?

There should be more information on how to acquire the system, catering to beginners in application security, to make it more user-friendly.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Semgrep?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Semgrep?

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs CodeSonar

Compared 60% of the time

Coverity vs CodeSonar

Compared 18% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs CodeSonar

Compared 8% of the time

Klocwork vs CodeSonar

Compared 4% of the time

Veracode vs CodeSonar

Compared 2% of the time

More CodeSonar Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Semgrep

Compared 41% of the time

Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs Semgrep

Compared 10% of the time

Veracode vs Semgrep

Compared 8% of the time

Black Duck vs Semgrep

Compared 8% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Semgrep

Compared 2% of the time

More Semgrep Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

December 2024

Download CodeSonar product report

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

November 2024

Download Semgrep product report

Also Known As

No data available

Semgrep Code, Semgrep Supply Chain, Semgrep AppSec Platform

Learn More

CodeSecure

Semgrep

Overview

GrammaTech enables organizations to develop software applications more efficiently, on-budget, and on-schedule by helping to eliminate harmful defects that can cause system failures, enable data breaches, and ultimately increase corporate liabilities in today’s connected world. GrammaTech is the developer of CodeSonar, the most powerful source and binary code analysis solution available today. Extraordinarily precise, CodeSonar finds, on average, 2 times more serious defects in software than other static analysis solutions. Designed for organizations with zero tolerance for defects and vulnerabilities in their applications, CodeSonar provides static analysis for applications where reliability and security are paramount - widely used by software developers in avionics, medical, automotive, industrial control, and other mission-critical applications. Some of GrammaTech's customers include Toyota, GE, Hyundai, Kawasaki, LG, Lockheed Martin, NASA, Northrop Grumman, Panasonic, and Samsung.

Semgrep is a tool for identifying vulnerabilities in code and ensuring code quality through static analysis. It is known for its efficiency, customizable rules, and seamless integration into CI/CD pipelines.

Semgrep aids developers in maintaining secure codebases by automating security checks and reducing manual code reviews. It is particularly valued for enforcing coding standards and discovering common security flaws early in the development process. Its ability to handle multiple languages and customizable rules, along with its open-source nature and active community support, make it a popular choice among developers. However, users have suggested that documentation could be more comprehensive, configuration more intuitive, and performance more optimized to better serve both new and experienced users.

What features does Semgrep offer?

Speed in Identifying Code Issues: Fast detection of vulnerabilities and code quality issues.
Multi-Language Support: Ability to handle multiple programming languages.
Customizable Rules: Users can craft custom checks to suit specific needs.
CI/CD Integration: Seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines for automated security checks.
Precise Results: Delivering accurate results with minimal false positives.
Open-Source Nature: Active community support and transparency.

What benefits should users look for?

Enhanced Code Security: Automating the detection of vulnerabilities early in the development process.
Efficiency in Code Reviews: Reducing the need for extensive manual code reviews.
Customizable Checks: Tailored security checks for specific project requirements.
Community and Support: Benefit from an active and responsive community.
CI/CD Compatibility: Streamlined integration with existing workflows.

Semgrep is implemented across various industries for its effectiveness in maintaining secure codebases and automating security checks. In sectors like finance, technology, and healthcare, where code security is paramount, developers rely on Semgrep to enforce coding standards, reduce vulnerabilities, and comply with regulatory requirements. Its ability to handle diverse programming languages makes it versatile and suitable for different types of projects, from small startups to large enterprises.

Sample Customers

Viveris, Micrel Medical Devices, Olympus, SOFTEQ, SONY

Policygenius, Tide, Lyft, Thinkific, FloQast, Vanta, and Fareportal

Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, Checkmarx, OpenText and others in Static Code Analysis. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Static Code Analysis vendors.

We monitor all Static Code Analysis reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.