Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CTERA Enterprise File Services Platform vs Cohesity SpanFS comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.4
CTERA's customer support is highly rated for its responsiveness and effectiveness in addressing urgent issues and engaging with clients.
High-priority issues are handled promptly.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
5.8
CTERA Enterprise File Services should enhance user experience, optimize updates, manage devices globally, and improve administration and legacy support.
Compared to where we started, they've made significant improvements in the last five years.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.2
The CTERA platform is scalable and adaptable, though licensing models raise concerns about scalability for CPU and memory upgrades.
If we need to upgrade CPU and memory, we should be able to do that without a license upgrade.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.0
CTERA offers cost-effective enterprise file services, competitive against EMC, Nasuni, NetApp, and beneficial in Total Cost of Ownership.
CTERA's pricing seems to be on par with some of the other players, such as Nasuni and Azure.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.5
The CTERA Enterprise File Services Platform boasts excellent stability, minimal downtime, and high user satisfaction with reliable data access.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.0
CTERA Enterprise Platform provides scalable, flexible data management with easy infrastructure expansion, seamless backup, and adaptable resilience across hardware.
As soon as something is written to the device, CTERA copies it to the cloud, where it's versioned with snapshots so we can recover it.
 

Categories and Ranking

Cohesity SpanFS
Ranking in File System Software
7th
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
CTERA Enterprise File Servi...
Ranking in File System Software
5th
Average Rating
9.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
NAS (11th), Cloud Migration (9th), Cloud Storage (13th), Cloud Backup (18th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (14th), Cloud Storage Gateways (4th), Content Collaboration Platforms (14th)
 

Featured Reviews

SM
Along with offering competitive prices, the solution can be used by small, medium, and large businesses
While guaranteeing the strictness of the file system, there is a lot of performance involved. The performance is not as good as I expected. It's not the functionality here but the performance level. It won't be a problem if it's twice as fast. Even though its stability has room for improvement, I would recommend it to my bigger customers. The only problem is the current performance of the individual nodes. As a sale-out solution with integrated load-balancing functions, performance is in principle not a problem at all. Capacity and performance are linearly scalable over the number of nodes in the cluster. An increase in the performance of the individual nodes in future releases would be desirable.
Igal Muginstein - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers flexibility, fast performance, and ransomware protection
The platform is releasing new features at a fast pace, which sometimes leads to version updates every three to six months. Although updates are generally not complex, it is challenging to stop the production environment during these updates, even if the downtime is just a few minutes. This is a common challenge across all NAS providers. From my perspective, the most important area for improvement is developing a method to perform updates without affecting customer production environments. Additionally, there are some cache size limitations that might become problematic for future use cases, though they don’t impact current applications. Collaboration for NFS and SMB protocols could also be enhanced. Although this issue isn't specific to CTERA, it is something we are working on together to improve. The quality of the versions has improved, but occasional issues still arise. All solutions face this challenge, but we hope to see a continued reduction in the number of bugs. That said, we haven't had any major production problems in the last four years, and we appreciate how responsive CTERA is to our issues. We engage in brainstorming sessions together, and we value this relationship.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File System Software solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
15%
Real Estate/Law Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
65%
Financial Services Firm
5%
University
4%
Educational Organization
3%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cohesity SpanFS?
Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cohesity SpanFS?
When it comes to pricing, I know the prices because I am also running tenders for customers where I am not offering other solutions. Hence, the prices are pretty competitive.
What needs improvement with Cohesity SpanFS?
While guaranteeing the strictness of the file system, there is a lot of performance involved. The performance is not as good as I expected. It's not the functionality here but the performance level...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CTERA Enterprise File Services Platform?
I would rate it a six out of ten for pricing. It is fairly priced. I am not too involved in the pricing of what we used to pay, but it would have reduced the cost of ownership. I cannot give a figu...
What needs improvement with CTERA Enterprise File Services Platform?
We have one of the early systems because we were early adopters. The new Edge filer that they have comes with a lot more features than what we purchased. It would be better if we are able to add th...
What is your primary use case for CTERA Enterprise File Services Platform?
The primary use case is production data storage. Our live projects get stored on the filers.
 

Also Known As

SpanFS
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Tribune Media
McDonald's, WPP, US Navy, Gore, Festo, Stryker, Bezeq, PERI
Find out what your peers are saying about CTERA Enterprise File Services Platform vs. Cohesity SpanFS and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.