Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Commusoft vs Oracle E-Business Suite comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Commusoft
Ranking in Field Service Management
19th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle E-Business Suite
Ranking in Field Service Management
2nd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
151
Ranking in other categories
ERP (6th), Activity Based Costing Software (1st), Benefits Administration (6th), Enterprise Resource Planning for Manufacturing (1st), Product Configuration and Quoting (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Field Service Management category, the mindshare of Commusoft is 1.3%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle E-Business Suite is 16.1%, down from 19.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Field Service Management
 

Featured Reviews

Use Commusoft?
Share your opinion
Nandan Gopalakrishna - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers a wide range of functionalities for large enterprises but system requires expertise to implement and configure
In the past few years, the main challenge has been the annual maintenance cost. We've often replaced Oracle with Dynamics, which is cheaper than Oracle but still expensive for governments in Africa with limited budgets to sustain it. So, the main challenge is the cost versus the value. We don't get lower value with Dynamics 365, and I've seen governments implement other alternatives like Odoo, too. They don't see the value in paying millions of dollars in maintenance fees. Oracle needs to understand the reality of the situation. In the African market, Oracle is the least of the considerations. People don't even want to consider Oracle. They need to come up with something more cost-effective because people do not see the value in paying those maintenance fees. As a system integrator, I don't gain anything because most of the money gets transferred to Oracle. They need to relook at their licensing models. NetSuite is pretty rigid for a cloud-based suite. There are varying requirements to make changes to the configuration, which becomes a hassle compared to even Dynamics. They need to relax how they handle this. The licensing is also very complicated, with so many parameters that it's confusing, and sizing becomes confusing. Streamlining the licensing would be helpful so that it becomes transparent for the customer.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Field Service Management solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Educational Organization
65%
Computer Software Company
5%
Manufacturing Company
4%
Financial Services Firm
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Oracle E-Business Suite?
It was very easy to integrate the product into our existing infrastructure.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle E-Business Suite?
Licensing costs were a significant consideration, and Oracle Analytics was deemed too expensive compared to Power BI, which we opted for due to Outlook 365 licensing.
What needs improvement with Oracle E-Business Suite?
Additional improvements could include better healthcare management functionalities, such as specialized modules for OPD and IPD for patients. A more web-based user experience like Oracle Fusion wou...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Oracle EBS, OEBS
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Alister Hubbard Gas Service, Mycroft Heating and Plumbing, WPJ Heating Services
Colab, Portobello, Saudi Telecom Company, DG Khan Cement, Dubai Holding
Find out what your peers are saying about IFS, Oracle, Freshworks and others in Field Service Management. Updated: November 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.