Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Comodo cWatch vs Radware Cloud WAF Service comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Comodo cWatch
Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
25th
Average Rating
9.6
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
CDN (12th)
Radware Cloud WAF Service
Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
10th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Comodo cWatch is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Radware Cloud WAF Service is 0.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
 

Featured Reviews

Bernardo Murillo - PeerSpot reviewer
May 24, 2024
Alerts organizations if any malware is detected and removes it quickly
I use the solution to detect vulnerabilities in the site The solution allows me to change my logo. It gives me a white-label portal because I am a partner. OWASP has been the most effective in malware prevention. It can detect if the headers are okay and do FTP scans. We get alerts if we have…
ARMANDO CARRETO CASTRO - PeerSpot reviewer
May 31, 2024
It's a highly efficient solution for dealing with web shell attacks
The main benefit is that all traffic is shifted by the cloud service, which exists outside the customer's infrastructure. It's highly efficient. Many customers have problems inside the infrastructure that must be efficiently detected. With Cloud WAF we can notify our client when an attack is outside and detect when a web shell script is already running on the server. This information helps the client understand what's happening with the web shell. We've reduced many false positives using Cloud WAF Service. The learning period is helpful. Radware sends a policy with a lot of information that helps the customer observe and design their policies to eliminate false positives. Cloud WAF saves us a lot of time because we face many strong attacks. It helps us modify the back end and implement some policies to prevent more attacks.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The FIM feature, the information in the new management system, and their support are the most valuable features. The scanned results are quite fast as compared to other platforms compared to scanning timing. It takes about a minute or two minutes. Also, the results of the Comodo scan results are in detail."
"The solution is pretty stable. I've never faced pressing issues or hanging issue."
"We get alerts if we have some malware."
"The solution offers good protection."
"One of the most valuable features we have found in the solution is protection against attacks from botnet networks and the requests that these remote networks can generate that are blocked from our servers. That frees us from having to deal with that traffic."
"The most valuable feature of Radware Cloud WAF Service is the visibility into attacks that are being cut off instantly."
"I like that Cloud WAF provides me with lots of information. All the events and all the possible attacks appear in front of you, and false positives appear through different channels."
"The API Discovery is also very good because the application is outsourced, which means that we don't have the code. API Discovery allowed me to discover precisely how to orchestrate the API so that I could see the results."
"The solution requires very little maintenance; we install it, it works without any problems, is reliable, and we can almost forget about it."
"The most valuable feature is the monitoring dashboard that we access through the portal."
"The best feature is the SQL injection signatures, and another is the DDoS protection. Radware is more efficient than other solutions."
 

Cons

"The portal is a little slow."
"A small problem is from the support team. Sometimes they are a bit delayed."
"The solution needs to build better performance, specifically in the hardware resources."
"Radware's bot manager can be improved because it's very complicated to implement for apps. Radware could also add alerts by WhatsApp or Telegram. It only sends notifications via email or SMS."
"The integration part could be better."
"If we want to publish services to a limited number of providers and we only want those providers to connect, we need to forward those requests to the Radware support team and they apply them, but it takes some time."
"They have a portal for webinar training but because we are in a Spanish-speaking country, it is difficult for us to watch them. Not all of us are fluent in English, but most of the courses and webinars are in English. That part could be improved..."
"Radware does not have much online training available to help customers get the most out of this solution."
"Radware Cloud WAF Service should provide SSL certificates for its hosting customers."
"The lower-level technical team at Radware could improve their approach to problem-solving as they sometimes are very slow."
"They need to improve their reporting."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Comodo cWatch’s first level, which has fewer features, costs $7."
"I believe the prices are fair."
"Radware Cloud WAF Service falls within a mid-range price bracket compared to other web application firewall solutions."
"For the current market, the price for Radware Cloud WAF Service is exactly where we want it to be."
"We evaluated other options and, if I remember correctly, one of them was Fortinet, but they didn't seem as effective as Radware. But the price was the biggest difference. Radware had the best price for our type of network and level of scaling."
"The pricing is fair."
"We are based in El Salvador and don't have a direct license with Radware; we purchase the license through resellers. The pricing is reasonable, as I managed an Akamai product in a previous position, and Cloud WAF is competitively priced."
"The pricing is fair; it's neither particularly cheap nor expensive."
"If you plan to deploy Cloud WAF, keep in mind that the product is priced based on the megabits of traffic that pass through and the number of transactions. You should get your requirements correct up front. The active attackers feed and CDN services cost extra, so you need to negotiate these features upfront."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
805,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Wholesaler/Distributor
13%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
16%
Retailer
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Comodo cWatch?
The portal is a little slow. I have to wait for it to load all the information. CDN's performance must be improved.
What is your primary use case for Comodo cWatch?
I use the solution to detect vulnerabilities in the site.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Comodo cWatch?
Comodo cWatch’s price is very good compared to Cloudflare’s. The first level of Cloudflare costs us about $20. The next level costs $100. Comodo cWatch’s first level, which has fewer features, cost...
What do you like most about Radware Cloud WAF Service?
One of the most valuable features we have found in the solution is protection against attacks from botnet networks and the requests that these remote networks can generate that are blocked from our...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Radware Cloud WAF Service?
I'm not a part of the purchasing team. I do not know about the costs or licensing.
What needs improvement with Radware Cloud WAF Service?
They need to improve their reporting. We need to present our management with reports and we need better options for reporting. They don't want lengthy reports. They need something that is one to tw...
 

Also Known As

cWatch
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Xerox, Intel, HP, UPS, Western Union, Western Digital
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Comodo cWatch vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service and other solutions. Updated: September 2024.
805,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.