Control-M vs JSCAPE by Redwood comparison

BMC and Redwood Software are both solutions in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category. BMC is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.7, while Redwood Software is ranked #5 with an average rating of 9.3. BMC holds a 4.5% mindshare in MFT, compared to Redwood Software’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Redwood Software users who would recommend it.

Control-M

Read 121 Control-M reviews

1,744 Views
720 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

JSCAPE by Redwood

Read 22 JSCAPE by Redwood reviews

1,057 Views
416 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Control-M

JSCAPE by Redwood

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

Control-M and JSCAPE both compete in the workflow management and file transfer automation category. Control-M has the upper hand in complex workflow management due to its extensive integration capabilities, while JSCAPE is more focused on efficient and secure file transfer processes.

Features: Control-M excels with robust integration capabilities, including specialized modules for diverse environments and platforms like the Virtual Terminal for AS400. It offers seamless management of complex workflows and security features supporting cross-platform dependencies. JSCAPE specializes in handling massive file transfers efficiently with high availability and advanced security measures. It offers automation features and flexibility for diverse operating environments, supporting various protocols and configurations.

Room for Improvement: Control-M could improve by enhancing its output analysis capabilities and reporting functionalities. Version compatibility and cost-effectiveness also need attention. JSCAPE could improve its user interface to enhance intuitiveness, as well as bolster its API integrations and workflow automation features. Better documentation and customization options for complex workflows could also enhance the user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Control-M supports versatile deployment options, including on-premises and hybrid environments, with robust but occasionally criticized technical support. JSCAPE ensures compatibility across public, private, and hybrid clouds, noted for its straightforward deployment process and reliable technical support, despite minor issues with response times.

Pricing and ROI: Control-M is noted for its high cost and expensive licensing model, limiting access for smaller enterprises despite offering significant ROI through automation efficiencies. JSCAPE is more affordable, providing flexible licensing options that are appealing to budget-conscious businesses. It allows resource savings, though adjustments in pricing could better align with its value delivery.

To learn more, read our detailed Control-M vs. JSCAPE by Redwood Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Control-M vs. JSCAPE by Redwood

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,716 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Control-M

Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)

4th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

121

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (3rd), Workload Automation (1st)

JSCAPE by Redwood

Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)

5th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category, the mindshare of Control-M is 4.5%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JSCAPE by Redwood is 2.6%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

Featured Reviews

Pedro Fuentes

System Engineer at Community Loans of America, Inc.

Cost-effective, excellent support, and centralized access and control

They have a department that handles requests for enhancements. I talked to Control-M guys back in October or November when they had a gathering here in Atlanta. We talked about not being able to go back in history in Helix Control-M for more than two weeks. We submitted a request for enhancement. They told us that they are working on it, and they are thinking of expanding that to 30 days. We would like to see it expand to 90 days, but they are working on it. In Control-M, we were able to go back 180 days, but that was on-prem. The storage of that data was on our own servers. We know that storage is money, and we do not expect them to store that much of the data, but at least 30 to 60 days seem proper.

Read full review

Akshatha Ramesh

Junior Business Analyst at EFI

Good automation, no complex coding, and high-level data encryption

When it comes to performance and scalability, JSCAPE is a highly reliable software, however, I would suggest a few improvements: 1. The documentation needs a revamp for a better understanding of the features of the tool. 2. Customer service can be offered on call or chat. 3. The initial setup is time-consuming; it could use a video tutorial. 4. UI can be improved in terms of look and feel. 5. Documentation should be provided for a majority of newly released features as these can be difficult for a layman to use without proper instructions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has a very good GUI. We can search for a job very easily. The web interface, user account creation, and access control are very good. From an access control point of view, we can provide access to as many users as we want. A second group of users can be given a certain number of features, according to the requirements. The web interface is very easy for end users to login and use. A lot of features have been added, e.g., adding jobs. They can add jobs to their stuff, whatever they want, then get it validated by the scheduling team and work it into production."

"You can let users access the system and manage jobs: self-service."

"Self Service, BIM features are most valuable. As no need to login to EM client and check the job status."

"Control-M is infinitely scalable. We only need to add agents. BMC will take care of it if you need anything on the SaaS side, but we can handle the rest using our agent architecture."

"The solution has the power to reduce resources, which is good for business. It is constantly updated to remain compatible with new technologies such as Amazon, Azure, and Google Cloud. It's very easy to take advantage of the compatibilities."

"Promotions between environments, as well as local, mass update, versioning, and self-service."

"We have a better picture of our auditability. When someone comes to us, and asks for sources, "How did the deltas occur?" We can provide answers quickly, or at least quicker than what we used to. We are actually sure of the information that we provide, where before it was like, "Hmm, I think it comes from over there. Let me double check, but it gets really convoluted over here and I think that is where it comes from." Now, if it is within the Control-M environment, it has a straightforward answer that we can provide with confidence."

"It has absolutely saved us time. It has made us more efficient. As far as the processing between systems, we don't have as many people. They have been able to focus on other efforts, because we have been able to automate more stuff with Control-M."

More Control-M pros

"It is easy to transfer large sets of files."

"We receive customized email notifications and alerts regarding user activities and the number of login attempts."

"We can send the data quickly and securely."

"One of the standout features of this particular tool is its automation capabilities."

"The speed of transferring large datasets is super quick, which allows us to work on multiple tasks at a time."

"The JSCAPE MFT Server offers support for diverse protocols such as FTP(S), SFTP, SCP, AFTP, OFTP, and TFPT."

"The automation part of JSCAPE by Redwood is great because you can set up a scheduled delivery with files and be notified if the transfer was successful."

"The user-friendly interface has made it easy for fresh users to adopt it."

More JSCAPE by Redwood pros

Cons

"When it comes to supporting cloud services, Control-M is a bit slow. We are not advancing with the technology because we don't have the modules that can interact or use the new application services provided by the cloud technologies."

"There is definitely room for improvement. Version 9.0.20 actually comes with a web-based interface, but there are still a lot of things unavailable with it. There will eventually be more inclusions added into the web interface, but there is still a long way to go."

"The unifying features between Control-M for different platforms needs improvement. The scheduling options on the Control-M mainframe jobs are different than they are on our Linux server. There are a few differences here and there."

"There can be some complexities with the UI part, especially with the advanced features."

"I do not have any specific suggestions for additional features that should be included in the next release."

"We have some plug-ins like BOBJ, and we need a little improvement there. Other than that, it has been pretty good. I haven't seen any issues."

"With the current version update, I'm not sure why we needed a separate database upgrade. Why not put it all in one package? Previously, you could do it either via a manual upgrade or an in-place upgrade but it wasn't separate."

"The performance could be better. Control-M Enterprise Manager tends to slow the system down even on a server with a six-core processor and 32 gigabytes RAM. The console is Java-based, so maybe OpenJDK 16 or 17 would be a performance improvement."

More Control-M cons

"Improving the error handling feature can help users to identify and resolve issues more quickly and efficiently."

"The product's pricing needs improvement."

"The documentation part can be improved to be more precise for beginners to understand the advanced features of the tool."

"They could create an in-depth document so that any user with little to no background can implement this and use the software effectively."

"The FTP/S and ad-hoc techniques can further be automated."

"The initial setup is a bit hectic during the installation."

"Database crashing was seen whenever there was an overload."

"Setup is time-consuming."

More JSCAPE by Redwood cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Control-M isn't cheap, but this is an enterprise model."

"Pricing varies depending on which components and modules you are using."

"This is an area where it is a little difficult to work with BMC. They want to do licenses by job, which is what we have. For example, the simplest is to license by job, but they can also license by nodes. While the licensing is simple to use, it might not be the correct licensing model for the customer. It is okay because we want to license by job, which is something measurable. At the end of the day, licensing by job is the most important."

"You're going to spend a lot of money upfront, but the benefits you're going to get out of it are going to quickly pay for it."

"The product price is reasonable. I rate the pricing an eight."

"This product saves hours in a day based on my experience working here versus other companies with manually operations."

"The pricing is moderate, not too low or too high compared to other solutions."

"Pricing is generally affordable, though some features cost a bit more."

More Control-M pricing and cost advice

"The software is expensive compared to other vendors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

16%

Retailer

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?

Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and th...

See all answers

What do you like most about Control-M?

First of all, the shift from manual to automation has been valuable. We have a tool that can automate.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Control-M?

It is a little bit expensive.

See all answers

What do you like most about JSCAPE?

The product's most valuable feature is the high availability clustering.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JSCAPE?

I rate the product’s pricing a three out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with JSCAPE?

JSCAPE ensures data integrity. You know that the file has been transferred and on which date, as we provide timestamps. We handle cybersecurity ourselves with proprietary technologies for the netwo...

See all answers

Comparisons

AutoSys Workload Automation vs Control-M

Compared 16% of the time

Automic Automation vs Control-M

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Workload Automation vs Control-M

Compared 7% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs Control-M

Compared 6% of the time

Stonebranch vs Control-M

Compared 5% of the time

More Control-M Competitors

MOVEit vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 29% of the time

GoAnywhere MFT vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 28% of the time

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 18% of the time

Kiteworks vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 10% of the time

Globalscape EFT vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 8% of the time

More JSCAPE by Redwood Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Control-M

April 2025

Download Control-M product report

Buyer's Guide

JSCAPE by Redwood

April 2025

Download JSCAPE by Redwood product report

Also Known As

Control M

No data available

Overview

Control-M is used for enterprise workload automation, orchestrating finance, retail, healthcare, and supply chain processes. It handles batch job scheduling, managed file transfers, cloud integrations, and compliance auditing across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments.

Organizations leverage Control-M to efficiently monitor and manage business-critical processes like payroll, HR, SAP, Informatica, and database tasks. It enhances visibility, security, and error resolution. Automating and optimizing workflows in data centers, AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud Platform, Control-M supports diverse technological environments. The platform's robust capabilities make it suitable for effective centralized management of applications and data pipelines, ensuring enhanced collaboration and scalability.

What are Control-M's most important features?

Integration capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with various systems
Automation API: Facilitates automation through APIs
Managed File Transfer: Simplifies secure file transfers
GUI console: Intuitive graphical user interface
Role-based administration: Provides access control
Single-pane view: Centralized monitoring dashboard
Scheduling options: Flexible job scheduling
Workflow orchestration: Coordinates complex workflows
Reporting: Generates insightful reports
Monitoring: Tracks and manages tasks
Forecasting: Predicts future workloads
Self-service portal: Empowers users with self-service tools
Plugins: Extends functionality through additional plugins

What are the benefits or ROI of using Control-M?

Enhanced visibility: Centralized view of all processes
Ease of use: User-friendly interface
Error reduction: Minimizes manual errors
Improved collaboration: Facilitates teamwork
Scalability: Supports growth and scale
Support: Comprehensive customer support

Control-M is implemented in industries like finance to handle payroll and HR tasks, in retail for inventory management and supply chain processes, and in healthcare for compliance auditing and patient data processing. Organizations benefit from streamlined workflows and automated processes across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments, ensuring efficient and secure operations.

BMC

JSCAPE platform offers independent managed file transfer (MFT) software that allows users to secure and automate data exchange with trading partners, clients and internal transfers. Built-in security features and audit functions support PCI DSS, HIPAA, GLBA and Sarbanes-Oxley compliance. SaaS (MFTaaS) offering available.

Redwood Software

Sample Customers

CARFAX, Tampa General Hospital, Navistar, Amadeus, Raymond James, Railinc

BAE Systems, ABN AMRO, Boeing, Bank of America, Dassault Falcon Jet Corp, Bank of Montreal, General Dynamics, Bank of Taiwan, General Electric, Citibank Canada, Honeywell, CreditSuisse, L-3 Communications, Columbia University, Harvard Medical School, Kaplan Higher Education, Northwest Christian College, Kaiser Permanente, Share Builder, Procter & Gamble, TransUnion, Roche Diagnostics, BASF, 1-800-Contacts, Canon, AMPM, Daimler AG, Coach, Edwards Brothers, USB Financial Services

Buyer's Guide

Control-M vs. JSCAPE by Redwood

April 2025

Free Report: Control-M vs. JSCAPE by Redwood

Find out what your peers are saying about Control-M vs. JSCAPE by Redwood and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Control-M vs. JSCAPE by Redwood report.

See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.