Control-M vs JSCAPE by Redwood comparison

BMC and Redwood Software are both solutions in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category. BMC is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.7, while Redwood Software is ranked #5 with an average rating of 9.3. BMC holds a 4.5% mindshare in MFT, compared to Redwood Software’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Redwood Software users who would recommend it.

Control-M

Read 120 Control-M reviews

1,744 Views
720 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

JSCAPE by Redwood

Read 22 JSCAPE by Redwood reviews

1,057 Views
416 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Control-M

JSCAPE by Redwood

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

Control-M and JSCAPE both compete in the workflow management and file transfer automation category. Control-M has the upper hand in complex workflow management due to its extensive integration capabilities, while JSCAPE is more focused on efficient and secure file transfer processes.

Features: Control-M excels with robust integration capabilities, including specialized modules for diverse environments and platforms like the Virtual Terminal for AS400. It offers seamless management of complex workflows and security features supporting cross-platform dependencies. JSCAPE specializes in handling massive file transfers efficiently with high availability and advanced security measures. It offers automation features and flexibility for diverse operating environments, supporting various protocols and configurations.

Room for Improvement: Control-M could improve by enhancing its output analysis capabilities and reporting functionalities. Version compatibility and cost-effectiveness also need attention. JSCAPE could improve its user interface to enhance intuitiveness, as well as bolster its API integrations and workflow automation features. Better documentation and customization options for complex workflows could also enhance the user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Control-M supports versatile deployment options, including on-premises and hybrid environments, with robust but occasionally criticized technical support. JSCAPE ensures compatibility across public, private, and hybrid clouds, noted for its straightforward deployment process and reliable technical support, despite minor issues with response times.

Pricing and ROI: Control-M is noted for its high cost and expensive licensing model, limiting access for smaller enterprises despite offering significant ROI through automation efficiencies. JSCAPE is more affordable, providing flexible licensing options that are appealing to budget-conscious businesses. It allows resource savings, though adjustments in pricing could better align with its value delivery.

To learn more, read our detailed Control-M vs. JSCAPE by Redwood Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Control-M vs. JSCAPE by Redwood

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Control-M

Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)

4th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

120

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (3rd), Workload Automation (1st)

JSCAPE by Redwood

Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)

5th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category, the mindshare of Control-M is 4.5%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JSCAPE by Redwood is 2.6%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

Featured Reviews

Pedro Fuentes

System Engineer at Community Loans of America, Inc.

Cost-effective, excellent support, and centralized access and control

They have a department that handles requests for enhancements. I talked to Control-M guys back in October or November when they had a gathering here in Atlanta. We talked about not being able to go back in history in Helix Control-M for more than two weeks. We submitted a request for enhancement. They told us that they are working on it, and they are thinking of expanding that to 30 days. We would like to see it expand to 90 days, but they are working on it. In Control-M, we were able to go back 180 days, but that was on-prem. The storage of that data was on our own servers. We know that storage is money, and we do not expect them to store that much of the data, but at least 30 to 60 days seem proper.

Read full review

Akshatha Ramesh

Junior Business Analyst at EFI

Good automation, no complex coding, and high-level data encryption

When it comes to performance and scalability, JSCAPE is a highly reliable software, however, I would suggest a few improvements: 1. The documentation needs a revamp for a better understanding of the features of the tool. 2. Customer service can be offered on call or chat. 3. The initial setup is time-consuming; it could use a video tutorial. 4. UI can be improved in terms of look and feel. 5. Documentation should be provided for a majority of newly released features as these can be difficult for a layman to use without proper instructions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The monitoring tool is very good. It's very easy for expert and entry-level users to use on short notice."

"The workflow is much easier compared to the ACS services we were using."

"We are using Control-M for day-to-day operations only. It is helpful for us in our day-to-day operations. It is a key in our financial sector. We are automating via Control-M in our treasury operations, including any evening updates. Control-M makes things easier and faster by helping our treasury operations go without any interruptions."

"The solution has the power to reduce resources, which is good for business. It is constantly updated to remain compatible with new technologies such as Amazon, Azure, and Google Cloud. It's very easy to take advantage of the compatibilities."

"Control-M has enabled true enterprise batch automation, which combined with the other BMC Control products on our mainframe platform, allows us to run a 24/7 site with the lights out."

"We can set up automated email notifications to the programmers or the whole team for a particular job. It helps save time because we're not consistently looking at the job to see if it has ended or failed."

"Our data transfers have improved using Control-M processes, e.g., our monthly batches. When we used to do things manually, like copying files and reports, we used to take three to four days to complete a batch. However, with the automated file transfers and report sharing, we have been able to complete a batch within two and a half days and our reports are on time to users. So, 30% to 40% of the execution time has been saved."

"In the client, it provides a unified view for me. I can alter the view that I want to see jobs and conditions. This is nice to have. The fact that you can see everything in one space is very important, especially these days where everything is about data and monitoring as well as because we are working from home on a global basis. So, I can monitor jobs in real-time, along with any failures or anything that might be stuck. The real-time monitoring and the ability to see everything in one place is important for us because we operate 24/7."

More Control-M pros

"We can send the data quickly and securely."

"The tool can transfer files of any size and type without any issue."

"It is a reliable and easy-to-operate platform for secure file transfers."

"One of the standout features of this particular tool is its automation capabilities."

"The speed of transferring large datasets is super quick, which allows us to work on multiple tasks at a time."

"The user interface feels easy to use."

"It is platform-independent and can flawlessly work on any operating system using the latest security standards."

"It helped in confidentially transferring files with a vast number of servers available with no external applications required."

More JSCAPE by Redwood pros

Cons

"Its installation can be better. Currently, we have to install it manually. The file transfer feature can also be improved. It is not very easy to transfer a file from business to business. In terms of new features, they can include new technologies. It can have API integration."

"The MFT applications should have more functionality and flexibility within that tool. Having more flexibility with that tool for handling the one to many or many to one concept. Like being able to take data from one source and push it to many locations or pull data from many locations and bring it back into a single source. That's why we still use our TPS program for the file transfers just because we don't have some of those capabilities available to us within MFT."

"The reporting tool still needs a lot of improvement. It was supposed to get better with the upgrade, and it really didn't get better. It needs help, because it's such a useful thing to have. It needs to be more powerful and easier to use."

"With the current version update, I'm not sure why we needed a separate database upgrade. Why not put it all in one package? Previously, you could do it either via a manual upgrade or an in-place upgrade but it wasn't separate."

"Some of the features are not available. We were about to deploy the REST API, but we had some challenges. We had to use a third-party application. So, it should be improved in terms of integrating REST API jobs. That was something that was lacking. The customer was not that happy in terms of getting the desired output. So, we had to use a third-party application called Hangfire. We would like to have more videos on REST API integration, and we would like to have easy integration with the Control-M application through the REST API."

"There's a lot of room for improvement and I think it can be more user-friendly."

"The Control-M API does not support SQL database-type jobs, where a job has been configured to use the SQL catalog to locate SSIS."

"One feature I would like to include is in the middle of the monitoring domain. In the monitoring domain, if I have to update a number of jobs, the only way to do it is by manually clicking on each job. I would like a feature that allows me to do a mass update in the jobs, which I feel is still lacking."

More Control-M cons

"Database crashing was seen whenever there was an overload."

"The initial setup is a bit hectic during the installation."

"With constant software releases and updates, detailed notifications and documentation on the improvements along with the comparison of the past and present features would be helpful to understand and use it better."

"Support for more complicated workflows, such as conditional logic or branching, could be added to allow users to create more advanced automation processes."

"The price is too high and the product line is too complex."

"They could create an in-depth document so that any user with little to no background can implement this and use the software effectively."

"Setup is time-consuming."

"The initial setup and configuration are time-consuming."

More JSCAPE by Redwood cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing costs are around $3000 a year."

"Control-M isn't cheap, but this is an enterprise model."

"There are two different types of licenses available. The first is based on the number of jobs that we run per day, and the other is based on the number of agents that we install. My current project has a contract for five years."

"The product price is reasonable. I rate the pricing an eight."

"The pricing is moderate, not too low or too high compared to other solutions."

"BMC's price is based on the number of jobs."

"Pricing varies depending on which components and modules you are using."

"The price is right because of the licensing schema, which is based on nodes and processes. You purchase what you use, no more and no less, and you can grow with time."

More Control-M pricing and cost advice

"The software is expensive compared to other vendors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Retailer

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?

Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and th...

See all answers

What do you like most about Control-M?

First of all, the shift from manual to automation has been valuable. We have a tool that can automate.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Control-M?

It is a little bit expensive.

See all answers

What do you like most about JSCAPE?

The product's most valuable feature is the high availability clustering.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JSCAPE?

I rate the product’s pricing a three out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with JSCAPE?

JSCAPE ensures data integrity. You know that the file has been transferred and on which date, as we provide timestamps. We handle cybersecurity ourselves with proprietary technologies for the netwo...

See all answers

Comparisons

AutoSys Workload Automation vs Control-M

Compared 16% of the time

Automic Automation vs Control-M

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Workload Automation vs Control-M

Compared 8% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs Control-M

Compared 6% of the time

Stonebranch vs Control-M

Compared 5% of the time

More Control-M Competitors

GoAnywhere MFT vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 30% of the time

MOVEit vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 27% of the time

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 19% of the time

Kiteworks vs JSCAPE by Redwood

Compared 9% of the time

More JSCAPE by Redwood Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Control-M

March 2025

Download Control-M product report

Buyer's Guide

JSCAPE by Redwood

March 2025

Download JSCAPE by Redwood product report

Also Known As

Control M

No data available

Overview

Control-M is used for enterprise workload automation, orchestrating finance, retail, healthcare, and supply chain processes. It handles batch job scheduling, managed file transfers, cloud integrations, and compliance auditing across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments.

Organizations leverage Control-M to efficiently monitor and manage business-critical processes like payroll, HR, SAP, Informatica, and database tasks. It enhances visibility, security, and error resolution. Automating and optimizing workflows in data centers, AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud Platform, Control-M supports diverse technological environments. The platform's robust capabilities make it suitable for effective centralized management of applications and data pipelines, ensuring enhanced collaboration and scalability.

What are Control-M's most important features?

Integration capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with various systems
Automation API: Facilitates automation through APIs
Managed File Transfer: Simplifies secure file transfers
GUI console: Intuitive graphical user interface
Role-based administration: Provides access control
Single-pane view: Centralized monitoring dashboard
Scheduling options: Flexible job scheduling
Workflow orchestration: Coordinates complex workflows
Reporting: Generates insightful reports
Monitoring: Tracks and manages tasks
Forecasting: Predicts future workloads
Self-service portal: Empowers users with self-service tools
Plugins: Extends functionality through additional plugins

What are the benefits or ROI of using Control-M?

Enhanced visibility: Centralized view of all processes
Ease of use: User-friendly interface
Error reduction: Minimizes manual errors
Improved collaboration: Facilitates teamwork
Scalability: Supports growth and scale
Support: Comprehensive customer support

Control-M is implemented in industries like finance to handle payroll and HR tasks, in retail for inventory management and supply chain processes, and in healthcare for compliance auditing and patient data processing. Organizations benefit from streamlined workflows and automated processes across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments, ensuring efficient and secure operations.

BMC

JSCAPE platform offers independent managed file transfer (MFT) software that allows users to secure and automate data exchange with trading partners, clients and internal transfers. Built-in security features and audit functions support PCI DSS, HIPAA, GLBA and Sarbanes-Oxley compliance. SaaS (MFTaaS) offering available.

Redwood Software

Sample Customers

CARFAX, Tampa General Hospital, Navistar, Amadeus, Raymond James, Railinc

BAE Systems, ABN AMRO, Boeing, Bank of America, Dassault Falcon Jet Corp, Bank of Montreal, General Dynamics, Bank of Taiwan, General Electric, Citibank Canada, Honeywell, CreditSuisse, L-3 Communications, Columbia University, Harvard Medical School, Kaplan Higher Education, Northwest Christian College, Kaiser Permanente, Share Builder, Procter & Gamble, TransUnion, Roche Diagnostics, BASF, 1-800-Contacts, Canon, AMPM, Daimler AG, Coach, Edwards Brothers, USB Financial Services

Buyer's Guide

Control-M vs. JSCAPE by Redwood

March 2025

Free Report: Control-M vs. JSCAPE by Redwood

Find out what your peers are saying about Control-M vs. JSCAPE by Redwood and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Control-M vs. JSCAPE by Redwood report.

See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.