Control-M vs UiPath Orchestrator comparison

BMC and UiPath are both solutions in the Workload Automation category. BMC is ranked #1 with an average rating of 9.0, while UiPath is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.2. BMC holds a 25.5% mindshare in WA, compared to UiPath’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

Control-M

Read 120 Control-M reviews

20,691 Views
8,093 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

UiPath Orchestrator

Read 32 UiPath Orchestrator reviews

241 Views
161 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Control-M

UiPath Orchestrator

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 5, 2025

Control-M and UiPath Orchestrator are key players in the enterprise scheduling and automation software market. While Control-M leads with its extensive feature set for large enterprises, UiPath Orchestrator appeals with user-friendly automation and robust AI capabilities, making it particularly favorable for RPA initiatives.

Features: Control-M is known for its robust cross-platform scheduling, enhanced job monitoring, and a wide range of integration capabilities, including connections with applications like SAP through control modules. UiPath Orchestrator offers ease of task automation, streamlined bot activities, and centralized data management. It is noted for its effective use in automation processes, supported by a user-friendly interface.

Room for Improvement: Control-M could improve its agility in job execution, modernize its UI, and enhance its reporting for better customization by end-users. Its licensing model complexity is also noted. UiPath Orchestrator could enhance its UI and optimize automation for exceptional cases. Simplifying setup processes and reducing licensing costs are potential improvements to attract more users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Control-M supports versatile deployment options including on-premises and public or hybrid clouds, making it suitable for large enterprises. It is praised for its technical support, though some users report inconsistencies. UiPath Orchestrator is commonly deployed in public clouds and its streamlined cloud-based deployment aligns with organizations preferring cloud solutions, although improvements in support could enhance user satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: Control-M's pricing is considered high due to its wide feature set, which may deter smaller businesses. However, large enterprises find value in its extensive capabilities, realizing ROI through reduced manual processes and improved service levels. UiPath Orchestrator, although perceived as costly, competes with alternatives like Microsoft Power Automate. Its pricing could be a barrier for smaller setups, though the provided automation benefits enhance its ROI value.

To learn more, read our detailed Control-M vs. UiPath Orchestrator Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Control-M vs. UiPath Orchestrator

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Control-M

Ranking in Workload Automation

1st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

120

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (4th)

UiPath Orchestrator

Ranking in Workload Automation

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Workload Automation category, the mindshare of Control-M is 25.5%, down from 25.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Orchestrator is 0.9%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Workload Automation

Featured Reviews

Pedro Fuentes

System Engineer at Community Loans of America, Inc.

Cost-effective, excellent support, and centralized access and control

They have a department that handles requests for enhancements. I talked to Control-M guys back in October or November when they had a gathering here in Atlanta. We talked about not being able to go back in history in Helix Control-M for more than two weeks. We submitted a request for enhancement. They told us that they are working on it, and they are thinking of expanding that to 30 days. We would like to see it expand to 90 days, but they are working on it. In Control-M, we were able to go back 180 days, but that was on-prem. The storage of that data was on our own servers. We know that storage is money, and we do not expect them to store that much of the data, but at least 30 to 60 days seem proper.

Read full review

Bantu Kumar

Technical Director at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Improves operational efficiency through its centralized dashboard and asset management

There are overwhelming features added to UiPath Orchestrator, which can lead to complexities. Permissions, roles, and queues sometimes result in conflicts, requiring deeper understanding. I would prefer if the tool was more intuitive and it is important to maintain simplicity instead of combining multiple functionalities, potentially through different licensing models to restrict features.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The unified view where you can define, orchestrate, and monitor applications, workflows, and data pipelines is important because we have more than one team working on Control-M. We have a support team, a job-creation team, and a SAP team. We can all work together on it. It avoids anyone from working on his part and not using the latest modifications."

"The best feature is that we can automate everything. Moreover, we can access all the features through one dashboard, which is beneficial."

"Workload Archiving is a very good feature for us. It helps with our customer requirements in terms of reporting and auditing... Previously, when we didn't have any archive server, we managed the data in Control-M with man-made scripts, and we would pull the data for the last 365 days, or three or four months back. Since we installed the archiving, we have been able to pull the data, anytime and anywhere, with just one click."

"First of all, the shift from manual to automation has been valuable. We have a tool that can automate."

"BIM is helpful because we do not miss any SLAs, as we get to know the issue well in advance. It is the topmost service that has helped us provide better solutions for the business."

"Self Service for repeatable, low impact workload automation processes."

"The most valuable features are the managing of file transfers and the product keeping up with technology."

"The File Watcher utility, cyclic jobs, and email alert notification are valuable."

More Control-M pros

"The platform serves as a valuable tool for orchestrating solutions within an organization."

"The centralized dashboard and asset management in UiPath Orchestrator have proven valuable in enhancing operational efficiency."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it was a user-friendly product with an intuitive design."

"The monitoring feature stands out as the single most indispensable aspect of UiPath Orchestrator for our automation processes."

"UiPath Orchestrator has eliminated the need for human operation, enhancing our automation process."

"UiPath Orchestrator is a user-friendly solution."

"From what I have seen, it is a reliable tool."

"The product helps to monitor our automation process and keep statistics. When not dealing with just one process, we utilize the business process. From there, we obtain the necessary answers, and the robot completes the process accordingly. We keep on improving our processes to become more effective. Hence, we start with a small process."

More UiPath Orchestrator pros

Cons

"The high availability that comes from BMC with its supplied Postgres database is very limited. Even using your customer-supplied Postgres database is problematic. We have engaged with them regarding this, but it is difficult. My company doesn't want to do this and BMC doesn't want to do that. We just need to find some middle ground to get the proper high availability. We're also moving away, like the rest of the world, from the more expensive offerings, like Oracle. We are trying to use Postgres, which is free. The stability is good. It is just that the high availability configuration is not ideal. It could be better."

"Its architecture is old. AutoSys gives more flexibility."

"After we complete FTP jobs, those FTP jobs will be cleared from the Control-M schedule after the noon refresh. So, I struggle to find out where those jobs are saved. Then, we need to request execution of the FTP jobs again. If there could be an option to show the logs, which have been previously completed, that would help us. I can find all other job logs from the server side, but FTP job logs. Maybe I am missing the feature, or if it is not there, it could be added."

"A lot of businesses are using ServiceNow, which is another tool. I would like there to be some integration with ServiceNow or other third-party tools as well as have easily available integrations. Right now, we need to write scripts. Apart from that, if there were some integrations with an ITSM tool, then that would be good. Because at the end of the day, most of our clients are using different ITSM tools. I know that BMC Remedy is easy to integrate with Control-M. However, if there was availability for Jira as well as other ITSM and DevOps tools, that would be a good improvement."

"While they have a very good reporting facility, the reports that I'm asked to produce, a lot of times aren't necessarily what we need."

"The stability of Control-M has Not been great. A big thing we've been trying to work on with BMC is observability. Modern applications should be observable and resilient, but we're finding that sometimes Control-M is not very resilient and many times Control-M is not very observable."

"They can improve their interface."

"There are numerous boxes to tick and things to check to ensure everything is in order before the upgrade happens. The process is very long"

More Control-M cons

"There are overwhelming features added to UiPath Orchestrator, which can lead to complexities."

"One of the significant challenges we've encountered with UiPath Orchestrator is the frequent and rapid changes in the tool's interface and functionality."

"One area for improvement in UiPath Orchestrator is enhancing automation for exceptional cases."

"The major issue is with the application according to the new version of the UI."

"In my opinion, some improvements could be made in the UiPath Orchestrator. For example, it's not so simple to see all the time triggers that we have. We need to check each folder and see all the triggers to see what kind of robot will run. We do not have all the triggers in one place, showing the time they will run and for which process in each folder. Another thing is that the tool for monitoring processes does not show the relation between the process and the machines running them. We can check which machine is available or not because it is running a process, but we cannot see the process and the machine running it in one view."

"The solution’s licensing cost is high and could be improved."

"It is challenging to accurately define text within images for the product."

"The solution's pricing can be more competitive. Apache is one of the most expensive alternatives in the market. The integration with reporting tools and classic solutions is essential. Having BI integration, Salesforce integration, and robust monitoring and reporting capabilities would enhance the product."

More UiPath Orchestrator cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing of Control-M is reasonable."

"There are human costs in addition to the standard pricing and licensing of this solution."

"One of the restrictions that we had was with some of the licensing, and not having any insight on the financials part of the product. I don't know what the licensing on the product is, but we don't have an unlimited enterprise license. So, there might be a limitation on either the cost of the licensing or the number of seats."

"The pricing and licensing could be better. However, when I compare Control-M pricing with JAMS, Control-M is still better priced than JAMS enterprise."

"BMC does NOT have a great licensing model from my perspective."

"The license model is based on the number of jobs we run on the SaaS application or the number of executions, unlike the on-premise model options. If we have a handful of jobs, it's always good to consider Control-M, but if it's a large number of jobs, Control-M might not be a great option."

"The cost of the hardware is high. Because you need to license each job, it is costly."

"Cost-wise, it is good."

More Control-M pricing and cost advice

"The product is quite expensive."

"Larger organizations may benefit from more favorable pricing, as the costs can be distributed across more licenses."

"I rate UiPath Orchestrator's pricing a six out of ten."

"The pricing seems reasonable based on project requirements."

"The product’s pricing is competitive."

"The product is expensive, and the associated licenses add to the expenses, initially making deploying new processes costly."

"The solution's price is high. We have subscribed to 15 licenses which are paid on a yearly basis. We don't pay any additional costs for support and maintenance."

"The solution is very expensive. Compared to Microsoft, another tool that is much cheaper than the tool, it does not have the same features that UiPath Orchestrator has. The most valuable feature in my platform is the queue items in UiPath Orchestrator to evaluate the products using this feature."

More UiPath Orchestrator pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

21%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?

Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and th...

See all answers

What do you like most about Control-M?

First of all, the shift from manual to automation has been valuable. We have a tool that can automate.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Control-M?

Pricing is generally affordable, though some features cost a bit more.

See all answers

What do you like most about UiPath Orchestrator?

Using UiPath Orchestrator, we can deploy tasks across different environments, including virtual machines, for both attended and unattended processes.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Orchestrator?

The price is about six on a scale from one to ten and needs improvement.

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Orchestrator?

The major issue is with the application according to the new version of the UI. We have developed our engineering and written it ourselves, so it becomes a problem.

See all answers

Comparisons

AutoSys Workload Automation vs Control-M

Compared 17% of the time

Automic Automation vs Control-M

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Workload Automation vs Control-M

Compared 8% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs Control-M

Compared 6% of the time

Rocket Zena vs Control-M

Compared 5% of the time

More Control-M Competitors

Automic Automation vs UiPath Orchestrator

Compared 44% of the time

Fortra's JAMS vs UiPath Orchestrator

Compared 23% of the time

More UiPath Orchestrator Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Control-M

February 2025

Download Control-M product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Orchestrator

January 2025

Download UiPath Orchestrator product report

Also Known As

Control M

No data available

Overview

Control-M is used for enterprise workload automation, orchestrating finance, retail, healthcare, and supply chain processes. It handles batch job scheduling, managed file transfers, cloud integrations, and compliance auditing across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments.

Organizations leverage Control-M to efficiently monitor and manage business-critical processes like payroll, HR, SAP, Informatica, and database tasks. It enhances visibility, security, and error resolution. Automating and optimizing workflows in data centers, AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud Platform, Control-M supports diverse technological environments. The platform's robust capabilities make it suitable for effective centralized management of applications and data pipelines, ensuring enhanced collaboration and scalability.

What are Control-M's most important features?

Integration capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with various systems
Automation API: Facilitates automation through APIs
Managed File Transfer: Simplifies secure file transfers
GUI console: Intuitive graphical user interface
Role-based administration: Provides access control
Single-pane view: Centralized monitoring dashboard
Scheduling options: Flexible job scheduling
Workflow orchestration: Coordinates complex workflows
Reporting: Generates insightful reports
Monitoring: Tracks and manages tasks
Forecasting: Predicts future workloads
Self-service portal: Empowers users with self-service tools
Plugins: Extends functionality through additional plugins

What are the benefits or ROI of using Control-M?

Enhanced visibility: Centralized view of all processes
Ease of use: User-friendly interface
Error reduction: Minimizes manual errors
Improved collaboration: Facilitates teamwork
Scalability: Supports growth and scale
Support: Comprehensive customer support

Control-M is implemented in industries like finance to handle payroll and HR tasks, in retail for inventory management and supply chain processes, and in healthcare for compliance auditing and patient data processing. Organizations benefit from streamlined workflows and automated processes across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments, ensuring efficient and secure operations.

BMC

UiPath Orchestrator automates website processes, manages supply chains, handles log-ins, and processes invoices efficiently. It's a comprehensive tool for generating reports, managing RPA workflows, scheduling robots, and ensuring task accuracy, making it indispensable for organizations aiming to optimize automation.

UiPath Orchestrator stands out for its user-friendly interface, centralized data collection, and robust security measures. Its intuitive design, combined with a comprehensive view of bot activity, makes it highly appreciated among users. With asset encryption, AI-integrated functionalities, and role-based access control, organizations find it reduces the need for extensive technical knowledge, thereby enhancing automation efficiency. It also excels in asset and queue management, logging capabilities, and scheduling functions, contributing significantly to streamlined operational processes.

What are the most important features of UiPath Orchestrator?

Centralized data collection: Provides a unified view of all automation activities
Robust security measures: Includes asset encryption and role-based access control
Scheduling functions: Allows efficient planning and execution of automated tasks
Asset and queue management: Enhances organization in handling automation assets
Logging capabilities: Tracks activities for better oversight and troubleshooting
AI-integrated functionalities: Improves accuracy and efficiency in automation

What benefits should users look for in reviews when evaluating UiPath Orchestrator?

Market visibility: Increased exposure and promotional activities
Code management: Improved management capabilities for Studio
Support response: Faster and more efficient support services
Credential vault: Enhanced flexibility in handling transactional items
AI capabilities: Advanced features at competitive pricing
Documentation: Clearer guidelines for transitioning setups
Integration: Better integration with reporting tools and comprehensive dashboards
Licensing: Streamlined processes for managing licenses
Monitoring: Centralized triggers for better process monitoring

UiPath Orchestrator sees wide application across industries such as manufacturing, finance, and healthcare. In manufacturing, it streamlines supply chain processes and automates inventory management. Finance companies use it for processing invoices and managing compliance, while the healthcare sector benefits from automating patient data handling and optimizing appointment scheduling. Each industry leverages the platform\'s extensive capabilities to enhance operational efficiency and accuracy.

UiPath

Sample Customers

CARFAX, Tampa General Hospital, Navistar, Amadeus, Raymond James, Railinc

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Control-M vs. UiPath Orchestrator

January 2025

Free Report: Control-M vs. UiPath Orchestrator

Find out what your peers are saying about Control-M vs. UiPath Orchestrator and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Control-M vs. UiPath Orchestrator report.

See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.