Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
UiPath Orchestrator Logo

Top 10 UiPath Orchestrator Alternatives

Vendor: UiPath
4.1 out of 5
Start review

Top UiPath Orchestrator Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to UiPath Orchestrator based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Control-M, Automic Automation, and JAMS. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

UiPath Orchestrator surpasses its competitors by offering unparalleled scalability, real-time analytics, and seamless integration capabilities, empowering businesses to efficiently manage their robotic automation processes with enhanced security and comprehensive workflow insights.

UiPath Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with UiPath, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
UiPath Orchestrator Logo
Control-M
4.4 out of 5
UiPath Orchestrator Logo
Control-M
4.4 out of 5
Control-M offers robust scheduling and automation for complex environments with advanced features, making it suitable for enterprises prioritizing integration tools. In comparison, UiPath Orchestrator provides centralized data management with a user-friendly interface, ideal for automating repetitive tasks with ease of use.
Download Control-M vs. UiPath Orchestrator Report
Control-M has a higher initial setup cost, while UiPath Orchestrator offers a more cost-effective setup, making it a budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Control-M has a higher initial setup cost, while UiPath Orchestrator offers a more cost-effective setup, making it a budget-friendly option.
UiPath Orchestrator Logo
Automic Automation
4.2 out of 5
UiPath Orchestrator Logo
Automic Automation
4.2 out of 5
Automic Automation offers robust multi-platform compatibility and scripting power suited for complex environments. In comparison, UiPath Orchestrator provides user-friendly automation and easy deployment, ideal for those prioritizing compliance. Tech buyers might choose Automic for comprehensive management or UiPath for straightforward deployment.
Download Automic Automation vs. UiPath Orchestrator Report
Automic Automation typically involves higher initial setup costs, while UiPath Orchestrator is generally more economical in terms of installation expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Automic Automation typically involves higher initial setup costs, while UiPath Orchestrator is generally more economical in terms of installation expenses.
UiPath Orchestrator Logo
JAMS
4.4 out of 5
UiPath Orchestrator Logo
JAMS
4.4 out of 5
JAMS offers extensive automation capabilities with batch scheduling, exception handling, and integration with PowerShell, suitable for diverse environments. In comparison, UiPath Orchestrator excels in centralized data management, scheduling, and AI features, ideal for those seeking advanced automation processes and comprehensive reporting.
Download JAMS vs. UiPath Orchestrator Report
JAMS features a minimal initial setup cost, contrasting with UiPath Orchestrator's more substantial installation expense.
View comparison
Pricing
JAMS features a minimal initial setup cost, contrasting with UiPath Orchestrator's more substantial installation expense.

Related categories

Workload Automation
Process Automation
Managed File Transfer (MFT)