Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
UiPath Orchestrator Logo

Top 10 UiPath Orchestrator Alternatives

Vendor: UiPath
4.1 out of 5
Post review

Top UiPath Orchestrator Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to UiPath Orchestrator based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Control-M, Automic Automation, and Fortra's JAMS. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

UiPath Orchestrator surpasses its competitors by offering unparalleled process automation, real-time management, and scalable deployment capabilities, ensuring seamless integration with other UiPath products for increased efficiency and comprehensive workflow oversight.

UiPath Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with UiPath, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
UiPath Orchestrator Logo
Control-M
4.4 out of 5
UiPath Orchestrator Logo
Control-M
4.4 out of 5
Control-M excels in reliability and scheduling capabilities, making it ideal for comprehensive scheduling and monitoring tasks. In comparison, UiPath Orchestrator stands out for its modern automation features and efficient deployment, making it suitable for handling complex workflows with a user-friendly interface.
Download Control-M vs. UiPath Orchestrator Report
Control-M is noted for affordable setup costs, whereas UiPath Orchestrator features higher setup costs. UiPath Orchestrator's robust capabilities can justify the additional expense for some organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Control-M is noted for affordable setup costs, whereas UiPath Orchestrator features higher setup costs. UiPath Orchestrator's robust capabilities can justify the additional expense for some organizations.
UiPath Orchestrator Logo
Automic Automation
4.2 out of 5
UiPath Orchestrator Logo
Automic Automation
4.2 out of 5
Automic Automation attracts tech buyers with its scalability and complex automation capabilities, ideal for deep customization. In comparison, UiPath Orchestrator appeals due to its ease of integration and wide range of pre-built activities, making it a preferred choice for rapid deployment and immediate functionality.
Download Automic Automation vs. UiPath Orchestrator Report
Automic Automation requires higher setup costs, while UiPath Orchestrator offers more economical initial setup. Automic Automation justifies its costs with advanced capabilities, whereas UiPath provides a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Automic Automation requires higher setup costs, while UiPath Orchestrator offers more economical initial setup. Automic Automation justifies its costs with advanced capabilities, whereas UiPath provides a more budget-friendly option.
UiPath Orchestrator Logo
Fortra's JAMS
4.5 out of 5
UiPath Orchestrator Logo
Fortra's JAMS
4.5 out of 5
Fortra's JAMS excels in job scheduling and seamless IT integration, making it ideal for those prioritizing dependable scheduling functionalities. In comparison, UiPath Orchestrator offers advanced automation features and machine learning models, attracting buyers with complex automation needs requiring a comprehensive feature set.
Download Fortra's JAMS vs. UiPath Orchestrator Report
Fortra's JAMS has lower setup costs compared to UiPath Orchestrator, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortra's JAMS has lower setup costs compared to UiPath Orchestrator, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial implementation.

Related categories

Workload Automation
Process Automation
Managed File Transfer (MFT)