MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs UiPath Orchestrator comparison

Salesforce and UiPath are both solutions in the Workload Automation category. Salesforce is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.1, while UiPath is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.2. Salesforce holds a 4.9% mindshare in WA, compared to UiPath’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Salesforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Read 58 MuleSoft Anypoint Platform reviews

1,330 Views
853 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

UiPath Orchestrator

Read 33 UiPath Orchestrator reviews

307 Views
176 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

UiPath Orchestrator

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and UiPath Orchestrator compete in the integration and automation software market. MuleSoft holds the advantage in integration capabilities with its flexible and scalable integration platform.

Features: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform provides robust API management, numerous connectors for systems like Salesforce and SAP, and a drag-and-drop interface for ease of use in building integrations. UiPath Orchestrator offers centralized bot management, effective scheduling, and robust logging capabilities, making it efficient for business process automation.

Room for Improvement: MuleSoft's high costs and complex licensing structure are concerns, with users seeking improved support and faster release cycles. Enhancing integration capabilities and batch processing would also be beneficial. UiPath Orchestrator could improve by adding more automation features for complex scenarios, refining the user interface, and simplifying setup to enhance user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft supports deployment across public, private, and hybrid cloud environments and benefits from community-driven support, though more streamlined official support is desired. UiPath Orchestrator is praised for its easy setup, with deployment available in public cloud and on-premises, and its customer-centric support is highly regarded.

Pricing and ROI: Both MuleSoft and UiPath are considered high-cost, but each offers unique value. MuleSoft's complex pricing is matched by its feature set, while UiPath provides flexible pricing models that are attractive for larger organizations. Both platforms deliver strong ROI, although MuleSoft's pricing limits appeal for smaller businesses compared to UiPath's more accessible pricing.

To learn more, read our detailed MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. UiPath Orchestrator Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. UiPath Orchestrator

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,989 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Ranking in Workload Automation

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Message Queue (MQ) Software (4th), Business-to-Business Middleware (1st), Cloud Data Integration (4th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (2nd)

UiPath Orchestrator

Ranking in Workload Automation

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Workload Automation category, the mindshare of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is 4.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Orchestrator is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Workload Automation

Featured Reviews

Vijay Subramanyam

Delivery Head at cblsolutions

Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations

I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten; it is a highly scalable solution. We have around 200 end users using this solution in our company. We use it to its maximum capacity. However, it's not for P1 applications, but definitely for severity two cases (P2 level). It integrates critical applications, but it's not a platform that, if it stops, the entire system would come down. So, it's more like a severity two level. However, it has the potential to eventually become a P1 platform. Not exactly P1 applications, but a P1 platform. Because now we are still in the transition to migrate everything, all the integrations to Mule Anypoint Platform. But once it's done, then this platform becomes critical. Because even now, we have point-to-point connections.

Read full review

Bantu Kumar

Senior Technical Director at Globant

Improves operational efficiency through its centralized dashboard and asset management

There are overwhelming features added to UiPath Orchestrator, which can lead to complexities. Permissions, roles, and queues sometimes result in conflicts, requiring deeper understanding. I would prefer if the tool was more intuitive, and it is important to maintain simplicity instead of combining multiple functionalities, potentially through different licensing models to restrict features.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We are very satisfied with the DevOps support."

"The monitoring capabilities of this product are very good because of the feedback it supplies in statistics."

"I have found several things most valuable, including its very quick implementation that you can use a lot of out of the box templates, and lastly that it is a very mature product, especially in hybrid integration."

"Good interface, simple to use and stable."

"This is the easiest and best tool available."

"The tool is very capable and offers a high performance. The tool supports batch processing and ETL processing."

"The product is very user-friendly."

"Initially, we faced challenges managing numerous scheduled jobs and duplicate entries in our SAP system. To address this, we developed a reusable component in Mule that all applications could use to interact with SAP."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pros

"From what I have seen, it is a reliable tool."

"Orchestrator's most valuable features include schedulers, queues, and integration with Splunk."

"The solution is easy to use."

"UiPath Orchestration works effectively in deploying, scheduling, and running automated bots across different environments."

"The focus on repeat application automation is valuable."

"The product has been pretty amazing at deploying, scheduling, and running automated bots."

"UiPath Orchestrator is a user-friendly solution."

"The centralized dashboard and asset management in UiPath Orchestrator have proven valuable in enhancing operational efficiency."

More UiPath Orchestrator pros

Cons

"It has different types of subscriptions. For platinum or lower subscriptions, there are not too many things that can be done. We don't see many features. They should release a basic version that has logging and monitoring features. These features should come with Mule Anypoint Platform for free instead of making customers pay separately for these features. Its dashboard can be improved to have a lot of charts so that it is easy to visualize information. The utilization part can be improved. The dashboard is good currently, but it can be better. Other solutions like Elastic have a good dashboard, and they allow you to administer the product from the UI. Currently, for RTF, there is a different dashboard or utility. It would be good to include the same utility in the cloud solution. It would be good if there is a centralized repository that includes the links to the information about various troubleshooting issues. The documentation is there currently, and it is good, but the troubleshooting information is too scattered. We have to go to different links to find troubleshooting information. This kind of centralized repository would be helpful for new customers who are implementing this solution. It will be helpful to see different kinds of issues that can occur."

"From a monitoring point of view, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform can improve on tracking transactions. When dealing with multiple transactions or trading, the system can lose control, and tracking becomes hectic."

"One area we'd like to see improvement in is the error logging and troubleshooting process."

"It's extremely expensive to change things in Anypoint MQ. There's also this issue of slow output of messages, and that needs to be improved."

"In order to set up a storefront, we currently rely on a third-party solution. It would greatly enhance our operations if this feature was integrated into their existing solution."

"The initial setup should be made easy and the documentation should have some guidance."

"Mule Anypoint Platform could improve by having more up-to-date adapters to do work in a digital space."

"The solution's licensing model is expensive and could be improved."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform cons

"I am interested in seeing more features like document understanding and AI integration."

"The installation of the product on an on-premises version can take a long time and may involve some troubleshooting procedures to be followed."

"The solution's deployment and architecture aspects could be improved."

"The solution must provide more AI capabilities."

"The major issue is with the application according to the new version of the UI."

"There are overwhelming features added to UiPath Orchestrator, which can lead to complexities."

"It takes us time to understand the process before we can publish it. Its pricing needs to be lower, and there needs to be a centralized dashboard."

"It's a bit difficult to connect to the licenses."

More UiPath Orchestrator cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's pricing is cheaper than other RPAs' since it is execution-based. Other RPAs charge based on subscriptions."

"The solution's pricing, as per the old approach, is expensive."

"MuleSoft Anypoint Platform really needs to work on its pricing model because it's very complicated."

"Mule Anypoint Platform is an expensive solution."

"Licensing can be complex as is the case with most iPaaS/cloud offerings."

"The tool is heavily bundle-priced. I rate the solution’s pricing five on a scale of ten, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap."

"Making changes in Anypoint MQ is expensive."

"Mule is not the cheapest integration platform out there, but it deserves the price we are paying."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pricing and cost advice

"The product is expensive."

"The product’s pricing is a little higher than reasonable."

"The solution's price is high. We have subscribed to 15 licenses which are paid on a yearly basis. We don't pay any additional costs for support and maintenance."

"The pricing is quite reasonable, particularly with the cloud version where Orchestrator is included in all other licenses at no additional cost."

"UiPath Orchestrator is an expensive tool to implement."

"The solution’s pricing is reasonable."

"The solution is very expensive. Compared to Microsoft, another tool that is much cheaper than the tool, it does not have the same features that UiPath Orchestrator has. The most valuable feature in my platform is the queue items in UiPath Orchestrator to evaluate the products using this feature."

"The product is expensive."

More UiPath Orchestrator pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,989 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

21%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?

I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...

See all answers

How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...

See all answers

What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?

This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...

See all answers

What do you like most about UiPath Orchestrator?

Using UiPath Orchestrator, we can deploy tasks across different environments, including virtual machines, for both attended and unattended processes.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Orchestrator?

The pricing of UiPath Orchestrator is a bit high. However, we can compete with that, though if they decrease the prices, it would lead to better market penetration.

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Orchestrator?

I would like to see high availability over two sites, with a main site and a disaster recovery working as an active-active solution, which is not currently supported.

See all answers

Comparisons

Redwood RunMyJobs vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 17% of the time

Tidal by Redwood vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Apache Kafka vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 6% of the time

ActiveMQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 6% of the time

IBM MQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Competitors

Automic Automation vs UiPath Orchestrator

Compared 45% of the time

Control-M vs UiPath Orchestrator

Compared 35% of the time

JAMS vs UiPath Orchestrator

Compared 20% of the time

More UiPath Orchestrator Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

April 2025

Download MuleSoft Anypoint Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Orchestrator

March 2025

Download UiPath Orchestrator product report

Also Known As

Data Integrator, Anypoint MQ

No data available

Overview

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is used for integration and API management, connecting enterprise applications across retail, e-commerce, and supply chain. It supports cloud-to-cloud and cloud-to-on-premises scenarios with real-time and asynchronous messaging.

Users leverage MuleSoft Anypoint Platform for diverse integrations including cloud-based and on-premises, enabling data transformations, middleware functions, and hybrid integrations. It seamlessly connects systems like SAP, Salesforce, and Oracle, facilitating data transfers and integrating legacy systems. The platform offers a graphic interface, quick implementation, and a variety of connectors, contributing to its popularity for robust and scalable solutions. Despite its strengths, users seek better technical support, more connectors, simplified runtime management, and improved documentation.

What are the key features of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform?

Marketplace for integration platforms: Provides pre-built connectors and templates.
API management: Efficient management and monitoring of APIs.
Graphic interface: User-friendly design for ease of use.
Monitoring capabilities: Comprehensive monitoring and observability features.
Quick implementation: Rapid deployment of integrations and APIs.
Pre-built templates: Ready-to-use templates for common integrations.
Stability and performance: Reliable and high-performing platform.
Data transformation with DataWeave: Powerful tool for data mapping and transformation.
Support for hybrid deployments: Flexibility to integrate cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Increased connectivity: Seamless integration of multiple systems.
Operational efficiency: Streamlined processes and data flows.
Scalability: Ability to grow with business needs.
Cost savings: Reduced development time with pre-built components.
Enhanced visibility: Improved monitoring and management of integrations.

Enterprises in retail, e-commerce, and supply chain implement MuleSoft Anypoint Platform to connect various applications and systems. It supports real-time messaging for inventory management, synchronizes customer data across platforms, and integrates with legacy systems for smooth data migration. Users benefit from quick deployments and a marketplace that accelerates integration projects.

Salesforce

UiPath Orchestrator automates website processes, manages supply chains, handles log-ins, and processes invoices efficiently. It's a comprehensive tool for generating reports, managing RPA workflows, scheduling robots, and ensuring task accuracy, making it indispensable for organizations aiming to optimize automation.

UiPath Orchestrator stands out for its user-friendly interface, centralized data collection, and robust security measures. Its intuitive design, combined with a comprehensive view of bot activity, makes it highly appreciated among users. With asset encryption, AI-integrated functionalities, and role-based access control, organizations find it reduces the need for extensive technical knowledge, thereby enhancing automation efficiency. It also excels in asset and queue management, logging capabilities, and scheduling functions, contributing significantly to streamlined operational processes.

What are the most important features of UiPath Orchestrator?

Centralized data collection: Provides a unified view of all automation activities
Robust security measures: Includes asset encryption and role-based access control
Scheduling functions: Allows efficient planning and execution of automated tasks
Asset and queue management: Enhances organization in handling automation assets
Logging capabilities: Tracks activities for better oversight and troubleshooting
AI-integrated functionalities: Improves accuracy and efficiency in automation

What benefits should users look for in reviews when evaluating UiPath Orchestrator?

Market visibility: Increased exposure and promotional activities
Code management: Improved management capabilities for Studio
Support response: Faster and more efficient support services
Credential vault: Enhanced flexibility in handling transactional items
AI capabilities: Advanced features at competitive pricing
Documentation: Clearer guidelines for transitioning setups
Integration: Better integration with reporting tools and comprehensive dashboards
Licensing: Streamlined processes for managing licenses
Monitoring: Centralized triggers for better process monitoring

UiPath Orchestrator sees wide application across industries such as manufacturing, finance, and healthcare. In manufacturing, it streamlines supply chain processes and automates inventory management. Finance companies use it for processing invoices and managing compliance, while the healthcare sector benefits from automating patient data handling and optimizing appointment scheduling. Each industry leverages the platform\'s extensive capabilities to enhance operational efficiency and accuracy.

UiPath

Sample Customers

VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. UiPath Orchestrator

April 2025

Free Report: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. UiPath Orchestrator

Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. UiPath Orchestrator and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,989 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. UiPath Orchestrator report.

See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.