Coralogix vs SwaggerHub comparison

"The log monitoring is good, and the dashboards that we create are beneficial."

"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."

"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."

"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."

"Coralogix scales well, and I will rate it nine out of ten."

"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The solution is easy to use and to start with."

"One of the best features of SwaggerHub is how it allows me to create APIs and control the evolution of APIs within an organization."

"One of the best features of SwaggerHub is how it allows me to create APIs and control the evolution of APIs within an organization."

"The tool's most valuable feature is licensing."

"The most valuable features are the collaboration between multiple teams and the control and distribution of specifications."

"It is quite a useful tool. It is quite good with the validation of the spec. It works quite well in terms of errors and conformity to the OpenAPI standard. It is better than Visual Studio Code in terms of editing."

"The product's initial setup phase was easy and not at all difficult."

"You can click & play and add the notation in a human-readable form. Spotlight is also very good in the graphical design of APIs."

"The scalability is endless."

"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."

"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."

"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."

"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions."

"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."

"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."

"The user interface is not intuitive, especially when first onboarding, and improvements could be made here."

"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions. The increasing volume of data and the resulting bandwidth charges are concerns."

"The review process should be improved. There seem to be some gaps, at least for us, for the editing part because we would like to have a full request review mechanism. They support some comments, but it is really hard to manage those comments. We would like to use the full request. Therefore, we are now looking to integrate with repositories. It has integration with Bitbucket and GitHub, but we have some internal constraints, and we need to move some of the repositories to GitHub. Our source code is on-premise in Bitbucket, and it was a bit of a problem for us to integrate. Now we are transitioning our repositories to GitHub, and hopefully, we can enable the integration. This will probably solve the problem with the review and approval. Its customization should also be improved. There are limitations around the support for the developer portal. There should be more customization options for the website that you can use as a developer portal. Currently, it has only Swagger UI with minimal customization. You cannot actually add additional pages and documentation for explaining concepts and general things. That's why we have started to look around to see what other tools are doing. They should also allow tagging on the API. We would like to add some tagging on the API to reflect certain things. Currently, any metadata that you would like to have has to be a part of the spec. You cannot do anything else. It should also have support for Open API 3.1, which was released at the beginning of the year. It would be great to be able to switch to that."

"SwaggerHub could be improved with better integration for tools."

"We have to use additional tools to test APIs."

"SwaggerHub's UI needs to be improved as it looks very old school."

"More integration and usability with the cloud microservices would be nice"

"It could be more intuitive compared to one of its competitors."

"Some areas of SwaggerHub that could be improved include the interface between the code editor and the visual editor, the integration with private APIs, which currently requires an upgraded account."

"It has limited functionality...Unfortunately, some of its features are not what we need."

"Currently, we are at a very minimal cost, which is around $400 per month since we have reduced our usage. Initially, we were at $900 per month."

"We are paying roughly $5,000 a month."

"The platform has a reasonable cost. I rate the pricing a three out of ten."

"The cost of the solution is per volume of data ingested."

"It has a yearly subscription, but I am not sure."

"The tool is cheap."