Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cortex XSIAM vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
5.4
Cortex XSIAM enhances ROI by automating over 50% of tasks, reducing SOC staffing needs, and providing significant value.
Sentiment score
8.5
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management boosts efficiency, cuts costs, and enhances security, offering increased ROI and growth through AWS cloud optimization.
Improvements to our security infrastructure contributed to overall business growth of approximately 150 percent over the past year.
By automating tasks, it significantly reduces the human resources required, leading to increased efficiency and productivity.
It has reduced the number of development and scripting hours along with maintenance hours.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.3
Cortex XSIAM's customer service is mixed, with some users praising effectiveness and others experiencing delays and escalation needs.
Sentiment score
7.7
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is praised for swift, expert support despite occasional redirection delays, boosting customer satisfaction.
It is ineffective in terms of responding to basic queries and addressing future requirements.
The support team was knowledgeable and offered a variety of quick resolution options.
Their SMEs have sufficient knowledge, and if they are not the right contact, they quickly redirect us to someone who can help resolve issues.
I would rate their customer support a ten out of ten.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
Cortex XSIAM is highly scalable in the cloud, supporting enterprises efficiently and earning high user ratings for scalability.
Sentiment score
9.1
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is praised for its scalability, adaptability, reliability, and efficient handling of numerous assets globally.
Without proper integration, scaling up with more servers is meaningless.
We have about 300,000 assets installed with agents worldwide.
Qualys Cybersecurity Asset Management has proven to be a highly scalable solution for us over the past couple of years.
Qualys CSAM is highly scalable.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.9
Cortex XSIAM is highly stable and reliable, with minimal downtime, swift issue resolution, and easy installation.
Sentiment score
8.1
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is reliable and stable but occasionally experiences syncing, performance issues, and data integration disconnections.
The product was easy to install and set up and worked right.
I would rate the stability of Qualys CSAM a ten out of ten.
They are constantly adding capabilities.
This platform demonstrates excellent stability with consistent 100 percent uptime and no glitches observed.
 

Room For Improvement

Cortex XSIAM needs better integration, performance, developer-friendliness, and AI-enhanced security solutions despite satisfactory current features.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management needs better integration, reporting customization, UI, cost efficiency, resource expansion, and third-party tool compatibility.
Obtaining validation for integrations from Palo Alto takes around eight months, which is quite long.
Cortex could improve the detection and online resolution of security vulnerabilities.
Qualys is currently not able to identify assets lacking DNS information.
We would prefer more options, such as 'approved only for pilot' or 'approved for this line of business,' allowing for better granularity in categorizing software.
The reporting feature could offer more customizable templates and easier-to-digest visualizations.
 

Setup Cost

Cortex XSIAM pricing is competitive, considered reasonable yet costly with add-ons, offering value but varies on affordability.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is valuable but costly, favored by large entities, and offers flexible pricing starting at $72 monthly.
The first impression is that XSIAM would be more expensive than others we tried.
The product is very expensive.
A monthly subscription starting at approximately $72 per month, depending on the specific package and features included.
Though the solution is considered expensive, if bundled with other services such as VMDR or cloud agents, its value would significantly increase.
The Qualys Cybersecurity Asset Management pricing is well-aligned with our usage.
 

Valuable Features

Cortex XSIAM provides advanced threat detection, integration, and user-friendly features, enhancing security management for Palo Alto users.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management enhances real-time asset visibility, vulnerability detection, and risk management across on-premise and cloud environments.
One of the valued aspects of the product is its use of artificial intelligence to detect security vulnerabilities.
The flexibility for creating manual workflows stands out.
By correlating this with QDS scores, we can accurately assess the risk level of high or low QDS scores associated with each asset and monitor them accordingly.
The most valuable feature is the real-time visibility Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides into all assets across our development and operational environments.
It also performs scans to identify any vulnerabilities, which helps to take proactive measures before those vulnerabilities are identified by any attacker.
 

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XSIAM
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (14th), Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (6th), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (8th)
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (10th), Patch Management (7th), Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (2nd), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (4th), Software Supply Chain Security (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. Cortex XSIAM is designed for Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) and holds a mindshare of 2.5%, up 0.4% compared to last year.
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, on the other hand, focuses on Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM), holds 5.7% mindshare, up 1.3% since last year.
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)
 

Featured Reviews

Forrest Stevens - PeerSpot reviewer
A robust security operation that ensures achieving automation, stability, and scalability
There is room for improvement in some areas, and I would highlight three key aspects. Firstly, the Attack Surface Management (ASM) module could benefit from more contextual depth. Currently, it tends to provide a broad overview without enriched context, and there's room for enhancement in this regard. Secondly, further integration capabilities with various other software products that can seamlessly tie into Cortex XSIAM would be advantageous. This would enhance its versatility and interoperability within a broader ecosystem. Regarding performance, there's potential for optimization. When multiple tabs are open in Cortex XSIAM, it can experience slowdowns, leading to longer load times for web pages. It's worth noting that this isn't a severe issue, and it doesn't entail waiting for extended periods, but there is room for improvement in terms of performance optimization.
Revathi VeeraRaghavan - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides comprehensive visibility and covers the complete attack surface
For some of the software, there was no life cycle or general information. We wanted them to give details in the database as and when the software comes. I raised a ticket for that, and after that, they updated the details for more than one million software. They should address the false positives generated in EASM. It is fetching assets that have Infosys as the keyword. They should fix that. When we click on the web application, it only shows potential web assets. The application details are not there. Overall, CSAM has matured a lot. These are the few enhancements that need to be done.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
23%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
9%
Retailer
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cortex XSIAM?
It is an effective solution in terms of performance and functionalities.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cortex XSIAM?
The first impression is that XSIAM would be more expensive than others we tried.
What needs improvement with Cortex XSIAM?
Cortex could improve the detection and online resolution of security vulnerabilities. We hope that the artificial intelligence in Cortex will assist in optimizing responses to vulnerabilities.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?
The Qualys Cybersecurity Asset Management pricing is well-aligned with our usage.
What needs improvement with Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?
In my opinion, the area that needs improvement is the role-based access control (RBAC). The access privilege management needs to be more robust and streamlined to enhance user access management. Ad...
What is your primary use case for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?
We use Qualys CSAM for information related to EOL and EOS applications. For the machines connected to Qualys CSAM, we have information about the serial number and hardware ID. We have some integrat...
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Cortex XSIAM vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management and other solutions. Updated: September 2024.
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.