Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cortex XSIAM vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform comparison

Palo Alto Networks and Seceon are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Palo Alto Networks is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.5, while Seceon is ranked #37 with an average rating of 8.0. Palo Alto Networks holds a 2.8% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Seceon’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Palo Alto Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Seceon users who would recommend it.
Cortex XSIAM
Read 12 Cortex XSIAM reviews
  • 2,201 Views
  • 1,564 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Seceon Open Threat Manageme...
Read 13 Seceon Open Threat Management Platform reviews
  • 1,339 Views
  • 561 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Cortex XSIAM and Seceon Open Threat Management Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Cortex XSIAM vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Cortex XSIAM vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 847,625 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XSIAM
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
17th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (6th), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (7th)
Seceon Open Threat Manageme...
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
37th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Cortex XSIAM is 2.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
 

Featured Reviews

Forrest Stevens - PeerSpot reviewer
A robust security operation that ensures achieving automation, stability, and scalability
There is room for improvement in some areas, and I would highlight three key aspects. Firstly, the Attack Surface Management (ASM) module could benefit from more contextual depth. Currently, it tends to provide a broad overview without enriched context, and there's room for enhancement in this regard. Secondly, further integration capabilities with various other software products that can seamlessly tie into Cortex XSIAM would be advantageous. This would enhance its versatility and interoperability within a broader ecosystem. Regarding performance, there's potential for optimization. When multiple tabs are open in Cortex XSIAM, it can experience slowdowns, leading to longer load times for web pages. It's worth noting that this isn't a severe issue, and it doesn't entail waiting for extended periods, but there is room for improvement in terms of performance optimization.
Read full review
TamimKhan - PeerSpot reviewer
Customization options need improvement but valuable threat management features and reasonable pricing benefit service providers
We are a Managed Security Service Provider (MSSP), and we provide services to our customers Seceon Open Threat Management Platform offers valuable features such as XDR and EDR. I also find the SOC and SOAR features valuable. Log management is another key functionality of the product. There are…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I would give Cortex XSIAM a rating of ten out of ten."
"It is an effective solution in terms of performance and functionalities."
"The most valuable features of Cortex XSIAM are the machine learning used to identify threats, the complexity of the environment of products, and efficiency."
"One of the valued aspects of the product is its use of artificial intelligence to detect security vulnerabilities."
"Its ability to deliver a substantial amount of security intelligence greatly enhances and optimizes our security operations program."
"The most valuable feature is the integration capability."
"Cortex XSIAM enhances our ability to apply endpoint protection policies, implement restrictions, conduct scans, and engage in sandboxing."
"The flexibility for creating manual workflows stands out."
More Cortex XSIAM pros
"The solution is stable."
"It offers a holistic approach with multiple solutions blended into one platform."
"We only recently started using Seceon, so we aren't taking advantage of all its features yet. We have enabled some proactive alerts about utilization and bottlenecks from high traffic."
"It is effective because it has threat intelligence from across the world and constantly checks and updates for new threats."
"The solution is very cost-effective compared to Splunk and LogRhythm."
"Seceon Open Threat Management Platform notifies only genuine alerts. It offers plenty of options that are suitable for MSPs."
"The pricing of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is very reasonable."
"The most valuable features are behaviour analytics, threat intelligence, endpoint detection, and response features."
More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform pros
 

Cons

"The standard integrations are very limited, and the integrations available are not listed in the marketplace. Obtaining validation for integrations from Palo Alto takes around eight months, which is quite long."
"There is room for improvement in expanding integrations to include more cybersecurity solutions."
"I am not sure if any improvements are needed right now."
"The standard integrations are very limited, and the integrations available are not listed in the marketplace."
"The support could be a bit faster."
"Cortex XSIAM needs improvements in terms of data onboarding, parsers, and third-party integration supports."
"It could provide more integration with a large variety of products."
"The first impression is that XSIAM would be more expensive than others we tried."
More Cortex XSIAM cons
"The dashboard has always been an issue."
"Certain features, such as DLP, need to be improved as they are superficial and not in-depth."
"For small to medium-sized customers, Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is good. However, for large enterprises, it is not as effective."
"It is a standalone solution now. They need to make it into a cloud-based subscription model. It needs more compatibility for co-managed solutions. It can also have more threats and deeper integration with Microsoft."
"The product could be improved by including sandboxing capabilities in the next release."
"We are at the client’s end, offering services. They don’t know about security rules and benchmarks. We are working on the discovery and remediation but we don’t really have the intelligence that was available while working with other tools. Human working is also very essential for the solution. The automatic session is impossible to play since it needs to touch Redfin for further analysis. No one has breached our clients."
"It would be better if they offered global coverage."
"Seceon Open Threat Management Platform sells some add-ons as part of the whole suite but not individually. If they sold them individually, they could potentially attract more business."
More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In terms of pricing, we found Cortex XSIAM to offer a very reasonable and competitive rate."
"Since Palo Alto is trying to get as many new customers as possible, they're offering very competitive pricing."
"The product cost could be considered value for money compared to other solutions in the market, though it is quite high."
"The solution is expensive compared to its competitors."
"The solution comes at a significant cost."
"The price is quite reasonable."
"I find Seceon OTM's pricing to be reasonable, not too high or low, just okay for the market standards. I can't disclose specific figures, we pay on a quarterly basis under a service model. I would rate it eight out of ten. As a customer, I always hope for better pricing options."
"The pricing is very competitive. It's not expensive."
"Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is cost-effective because it's a comprehensive platform that offers high availability."
"It has a per-asset model instead of an ingestion-based model, which gives predictable pricing. In terms of price, it is in the middle to lower range of SIEMs that it competes against. It is the most affordable solution that we have implemented so far. It was much more affordable than anything else I've implemented."
"We used the solution's trial version for two months and later purchased it."
"The solution is cheap and very competitive. It offers good tuning in terms of the pricing. Other solutions like Palo Alto and IBM are more expensive."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
22%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Performing Arts
8%
Educational Organization
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cortex XSIAM?
It is an effective solution in terms of performance and functionalities.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cortex XSIAM?
Cortex XSIAM is pretty expensive, and the licensing process is not very comfortable. CrowdStrike licensing is easier and follows an annual recurring revenue model, unlike Cortex XSIAM.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Cortex XSIAM?
Cortex XSIAM is pretty expensive, and the licensing process is not very comfortable compared to CrowdStrike. CrowdStrike offers an annual recurring revenue option that Cortex XSIAM does not provide.
See all answers
What do you like most about Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?
The algorithm used in Seceon OTM is clear and logical, categorizing events as needed. This helps us identify and respond to threats effectively.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?
The implementation cost is extra, but the license cost is reasonable with no hidden costs.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?
Certain features, such as DLP, need to be improved as they are superficial and not in-depth. Additionally, the non-core features need to increase in depth.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Cortex XSIAM Logo
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Cortex XSIAM
Compared 38% of the time
Microsoft Sentinel vs Cortex XSIAM Logo
Microsoft Sentinel vs Cortex XSIAM
Compared 15% of the time
Splunk SOAR vs Cortex XSIAM Logo
Splunk SOAR vs Cortex XSIAM
Compared 10% of the time
IBM Security QRadar vs Cortex XSIAM Logo
IBM Security QRadar vs Cortex XSIAM
Compared 10% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XSIAM Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XSIAM
Compared 6% of the time
More Cortex XSIAM Competitors
IBM Security QRadar vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Logo
IBM Security QRadar vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform
Compared 16% of the time
Wazuh vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Logo
Wazuh vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform
Compared 16% of the time
Fortinet FortiSIEM vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Logo
Fortinet FortiSIEM vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform
Compared 16% of the time
Microsoft Sentinel vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Logo
Microsoft Sentinel vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform
Compared 13% of the time
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform
Compared 10% of the time
More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
April 2025
Cortex XSIAM reportDownload Cortex XSIAM product report
Buyer's Guide
Seceon Open Threat Management Platform
March 2025
Seceon Open Threat Management Platform reportDownload Seceon Open Threat Management Platform product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Seceon OTM, Seceon aiSIEM, aiSIEM, Seceon Open Threat Management
 

Overview

Cortex XSIAM acts as a critical element for SOC foundations, integrating SIEM and EDR capabilities, valued for threat detection and seamless security orchestration with Palo Alto Networks products.

Organizations find Cortex XSIAM beneficial for SOC foundations due to its capability to integrate SIEM and EDR tools, facilitating data collection, detection, and response. It connects with third-party data sources while reducing management effort and offering cost-effective alternatives to competitors like CrowdStrike and Trend Micro. Featuring automation and integration with Palo Alto Networks products, Cortex XSIAM enhances threat detection. Unified architecture allows a comprehensive view of attacks, further supported by machine learning and integration with existing vendor solutions, ensuring that users gain insights without significant manual log analysis.

What are Cortex XSIAM's key features?

  • Security Orchestration: Streamlines processes across security operations.
  • Automation and Response: Efficient incident response management.
  • Detection Enrichment: Enhances identification of threats.
  • Centralized Endpoint Security: Comprehensive protection and monitoring of endpoints.
  • Forensic Investigation: Automated investigation to expedite threat analysis.

What benefits are evident in Cortex XSIAM reviews?

  • Cost-Effectiveness: Provides economical options compared to other market players.
  • Comprehensive Integration: Seamlessly integrates with multiple data sources and vendors.
  • Reduced Management Effort: Simplifies the administration of security operations.
  • Enhanced Threat Detection: Strengthens identification and remediation processes.

Industries implement Cortex XSIAM mainly in technology-driven sectors where centralized endpoint protection and automation of forensic investigation are paramount. By integrating several third-party systems for incident response, companies in competitive markets leverage its attributes for heightened operational security efficiency. However, users note areas for improvement, such as Attack Surface Management and integration enhancements, to better suit tech-heavy industries needing extensive connectivity with cybersecurity solutions.

Palo Alto Networks

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution that offers real-time threat detection, analysis, and response capabilities. It leverages advanced AI and machine learning algorithms to provide proactive threat hunting and automated incident response. 

With its intuitive dashboard, users can gain complete visibility into their network, applications, and endpoints, enabling them to identify and mitigate potential risks effectively. The platform integrates seamlessly with existing security infrastructure, consolidating data from various sources for centralized monitoring and analysis. 

Its threat intelligence feeds and behavioral analytics enable the identification of both known and unknown threats, ensuring comprehensive protection against advanced cyber attacks. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform empowers security teams with actionable insights, enabling them to prioritize and respond to threats swiftly. With its automated remediation capabilities, it minimizes the impact of attacks and reduces response time. The platform also offers customizable reporting and compliance management features, facilitating regulatory compliance and providing stakeholders with comprehensive security status updates. 

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is a robust and scalable solution that caters to the evolving cybersecurity needs of organizations across industries.

Seceon
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Caduceus, SUNY
Buyer's Guide
Cortex XSIAM vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform
March 2025
Free Report: Cortex XSIAM vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform
Find out what your peers are saying about Cortex XSIAM vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Cortex XSIAM vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform report.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.