Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs senhasegura Access Management comparison

CyberArk and senhasegura are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. CyberArk is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.4, while senhasegura is ranked #17 with an average rating of 10.0. CyberArk holds a 3.5% mindshare in PAM, compared to senhasegura’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of CyberArk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of senhasegura users who would recommend it.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...
Read 36 CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager reviews
  • 1,307 Views
  • 914 Comparison Views
85% willing to recommend
senhasegura Access Management
Read 1 senhasegura Access Management review
  • 352 Views
  • 223 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and senhasegura Access Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, One Identity and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM).

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Privileged Access Management (PAM) Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 849,210 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
36
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Compliance (4th), Anti-Malware Tools (5th), Application Control (5th), Ransomware Protection (7th)
senhasegura Access Management
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
17th
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is 3.5%, down from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of senhasegura Access Management is 0.9%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
 

Featured Reviews

Sumit Chavan - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps secure the infrastructure and control users with admin rights
There are many features that are currently missing. A customization option is required for certain policies. For instance, if we need to stop PowerShell scripting, we have to create a different policy for that. Being able to create a sub-level policy within a top-level policy would be good. Currently, no user-based policy option is available inside the EPM console. We can only create computer-based policies. The database is available, but there is a drawback in not being able to create local groups on the EPM console. We only have to depend on Active Directory. This limits infrastructure security as we depend on the Active Directory team to manage user groups. If they remove any users, we lose control. If we could create groups locally and block them or set specific policies, we would have more control. Local endpoint management is missing from the EPM site. Moreover, there is an issue with policies not running as expected when we make enhancements. We have to find multiple ways to whitelist applications or enhance policies.
Read full review
MW
With a great support team and stability, the tool also offers scalability to its users
The initial setup was easy. One just needs to write the initial configuration. Then, in senhasegura's cloud applications, you can use it. I just deploy it in PoC environments or demo environments and not for production. Hence, it takes much less time than I imagine when comparing its deployment in production. I think it can be deployed in two or three days. My company has partnered with senhasegura. We just downloaded the main machine for virtual use. Then, we get the key to install it. Before, you just need to try the general configuration. Then, you will have the web applications ready. Then, you can just discover the accounts or any devices that you want to manage the accounts and manage the credentials.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is scalable."
"Users can scale the solution."
"It offers great performance."
"You can use it to strip users of their local admin rights and, at the same time, elevate applications for them."
"I have always found that CyberArk is a very tight, foolproof product compared to most other products available."
"What sets CyberArk apart is its continuous innovation, staying ahead of the competition."
"The biggest benefit of CyberArk EPM for our customers is control over privileged access for endpoints. Endpoints are often the starting point for attackers to enter and move within a network. CyberArk EPM bridges the gap between security and operations teams. Operations teams are happy because work isn't stopped due to admin rights issues, while security teams are satisfied that full admin rights aren't given to all users."
"It doesn't affect operational efficiency. If you set everything correctly, the user doesn't notice that it is in the background."
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager pros
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
 

Cons

"For an experienced system implementer it will take approximately one day. However, for somebody who is inexperienced it may take up to five days."
"The product's threat protection and defense capabilities need enhancement."
"It cannot be on-prem. It is only cloud-based. Sometimes, that's a restriction in terms of usage."
"The price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required. The product's price should be made more flexible."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager could be improved by simplifying the administration process, specifically when setting up policies and applications."
"CyberArk is a pretty heavy solution."
"The turnaround time of the support team is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The tool should be more user-friendly."
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager cons
"In Linux credential discovery was a bit hard, but after Senhasegura's latest update, it is much easier."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The professional services for one eight-hour day would be $1,800."
"The price of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is expensive. The solution is priced based on the number of accounts onboarded and the number of concurrent sessions. Everyone else is included in the price, such as support."
"The tool is a bit pricey compared to its competitors. My company does work with competitors, but I don't have hands-on experience with other software. I've just done some comparisons."
"Although I do not deal directly with the pricing, CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is costly compared to other solutions. However, it offers beneficial features."
"licensing for this solution is based on the number of APV (privileged users), and the number of sessions that you want to record."
"I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten since the price can be too high for smaller businesses."
"The product's license is easy to procure."
"The tool's pricing is reasonable for customers."
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager pricing and cost advice
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
849,210 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
10%
Real Estate/Law Firm
9%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Looking for recommendations and a pros/cons template for software to detect insider threats
This is an inside-out --- outside-in --- inside-in question, as an insider can be an outsider as well. There is no short answer other than a blend of a PAM tool with Behavioral Analytics and Endpo...
See all answers
What do you like most about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?
The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?
I've received feedback that the pricing is high, however, for me, the value it brings is worth the cost. It's really one of the best solutions.
See all answers
What do you like most about senhasegura Access Management?
Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with senhasegura Access Management?
In Linux credential discovery was a bit hard, but after Senhasegura's latest update, it is much easier.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for senhasegura Access Management?
We use the solution to organize our passwords and manage our credentials without accounts.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Compared 24% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Compared 15% of the time
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Compared 15% of the time
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Compared 9% of the time
Tanium vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
Tanium vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Compared 6% of the time
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Competitors
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs senhasegura Access Management Logo
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs senhasegura Access Management
Compared 65% of the time
ManageEngine PAM360 vs senhasegura Access Management Logo
ManageEngine PAM360 vs senhasegura Access Management
Compared 35% of the time
More senhasegura Access Management Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
April 2025
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager reportDownload CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager product report
Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
April 2025
senhasegura Access Management reportDownload senhasegura Access Management product report
 

Also Known As

Viewfinity
No data available
 

Overview

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, a critical and foundational endpoint control addresses the underlying weaknesses of endpoint defenses against a privileged attacker and helps enterprises defend against these attacks through removing local admin rights, enforcing least privilege, and implementing foundational endpoint security controls across all Windows, macOS and Linux endpoints from hybrid to cloud environments.

Click here for a free 30 day trial: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager free trial

CyberArk

Centralized access management, with the purpose of protecting and controlling the use of generic and high privilege credentials, providing secure storage, access segregation and full traceability of use.

senhasegura
Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
April 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, One Identity and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
849,210 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.