Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo

Top 10 CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Alternatives

Vendor: CyberArk
4.1 out of 5
Leave a review

Top CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager surpasses its competitors by offering robust application control, seamless privilege management, and automated threat detection, enhancing security while reducing operational complexity and ensuring compliance across various environments.

CyberArk Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with CyberArk, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager excels in managing privileged access, offering detailed control and robust security features for enterprises. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint provides strong anti-malware protection with seamless Windows integration, appealing to those seeking comprehensive, real-time endpoint security.
Download CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Report
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager features a straightforward setup process with associated costs, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint provides a more complex installation with potentially higher initial expenses.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager features a straightforward setup process with associated costs, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint provides a more complex installation with potentially higher initial expenses.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
4.3 out of 5
SentinelOne Singularity Complete excels with AI-based threat detection, offering robust ransomware protection. In comparison, CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager manages user privileges effectively, enhancing system security. Tech buyers seeking advanced features might choose SentinelOne; those prioritizing privilege management could prefer CyberArk.
Download CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete Report
SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers a straightforward setup with clear cost structures, whereas CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager presents more variable setup costs, highlighting a significant contrast in initial financial commitment for users.
View comparison
Pricing
SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers a straightforward setup with clear cost structures, whereas CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager presents more variable setup costs, highlighting a significant contrast in initial financial commitment for users.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager delivers robust security through features like dynamic key generation and application control, ideal for enterprises needing granular role management. In comparison, Cortex XDR offers advanced threat detection with seamless integration, appealing to those prioritizing machine-learning-driven threat intelligence.
Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Report
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager has a straightforward setup cost, while Cortex XDR's setup requires a higher initial investment, highlighting a significant difference in up-front financial commitment.
View comparison
Pricing
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager has a straightforward setup cost, while Cortex XDR's setup requires a higher initial investment, highlighting a significant difference in up-front financial commitment.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
Fortinet FortiClient
4.0 out of 5
CyberArk focuses on privilege management, offering features like application control and password management. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient emphasizes network security with features such as VPN connectivity and web filtering. CyberArk is ideal for security enhancement, while FortiClient suits those prioritizing network security and cost-effectiveness.
Download CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Fortinet FortiClient Report
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager typically involves a higher upfront setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiClient, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup. Users may balance greater initial investment for advanced features against a lower-cost start.
View comparison
Pricing
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager typically involves a higher upfront setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiClient, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup. Users may balance greater initial investment for advanced features against a lower-cost start.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
4.0 out of 5
Kaspersky offers a comprehensive, cost-effective security suite with antivirus, firewall, and centralized management, suitable for varied deployments. In comparison, CyberArk provides advanced privilege and session management ideal for complex, multi-cloud environments, despite its higher cost, targeting robust security and user access control.
Download CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Report
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business offers an affordable setup cost, while CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager tends to be more expensive for initial deployment. Kaspersky focuses on cost-effectiveness, whereas CyberArk emphasizes advanced privilege management capabilities and secu...
View comparison
Pricing
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business offers an affordable setup cost, while CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager tends to be more expensive for initial deployment. Kaspersky focuses on cost-effectiveness, whereas CyberArk emphasizes advanced privilege management capabilities and secu...
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
4.1 out of 5
Trend Vision One offers comprehensive threat protection and versatile deployment options, ideal for varied environments. In comparison, CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager specializes in privilege management and access control, suitable for complex access needs, providing increased security for larger enterprises despite higher costs.
Download CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security requires a straightforward setup process, while CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager may involve a higher initial cost. The setup of Trend Vision One is noted for its cost efficiency compared to CyberArk's setup fees.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security requires a straightforward setup process, while CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager may involve a higher initial cost. The setup of Trend Vision One is noted for its cost efficiency compared to CyberArk's setup fees.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint
3.9 out of 5
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager emphasizes robust privilege management and application control, crucial for security. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint focuses on advanced threat detection using behavioral analysis. Both offer flexibility and strong ROI, appealing to organizations with varying priorities.
Download CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager offers a moderate setup cost, providing a straightforward onboarding process, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint requires a higher investment, which could be justified by its extensive security features and advanced customization options.
View comparison
Pricing
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager offers a moderate setup cost, providing a straightforward onboarding process, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint requires a higher investment, which could be justified by its extensive security features and advanced customization options.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
Delinea Secret Server
4.0 out of 5
Delinea Secret Server is favored for its competitive pricing and simple deployment, making it ideal for businesses seeking cost-effective password management. In comparison, CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager excels with advanced endpoint protection, justifying its higher cost for enterprises prioritizing robust security features.
Download CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Delinea Secret Server Report
Delinea Secret Server has a higher setup cost but offers comprehensive features, while CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager presents a more economical setup option, appealing to those with budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
Delinea Secret Server has a higher setup cost but offers comprehensive features, while CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager presents a more economical setup option, appealing to those with budget constraints.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
4.0 out of 5
BeyondTrust attracts buyers with competitive pricing and effective integration, offering straightforward privilege management. In comparison, CyberArk offers advanced session isolation and security controls, justifying its higher cost for those prioritizing robust security features. BeyondTrust ensures cost-effectiveness, while CyberArk promises comprehensive protection.
Download BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Report
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management involves higher setup costs than CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager. CyberArk offers more cost-effective initial setup, highlighting cost-efficiency differences between the two software solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management involves higher setup costs than CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager. CyberArk offers more cost-effective initial setup, highlighting cost-efficiency differences between the two software solutions.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
WALLIX Bastion
3.8 out of 5
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
WALLIX Bastion
3.8 out of 5
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager excels in pricing, support, and detailed access control, appealing to those prioritizing cost-effectiveness and robust security. In comparison, WALLIX Bastion's feature-rich offering with centralized management attracts tech buyers seeking comprehensive monitoring and long-term ROI.
Download CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. WALLIX Bastion Report
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager has a manageable setup cost, whereas WALLIX Bastion involves a higher initial investment for setup.
View comparison
Pricing
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager has a manageable setup cost, whereas WALLIX Bastion involves a higher initial investment for setup.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform
4.6 out of 5
CyberArk enhances security with credential management and lifecycle key management. In comparison, ThreatLocker provides flexible deployment and effective application control. CyberArk may attract larger enterprises, while ThreatLocker appeals to businesses seeking adaptive security solutions at a reasonable cost.
Download CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform Report
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager offers a more straightforward setup process, while ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform features a higher initial configuration cost, highlighting a key difference between these two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager offers a more straightforward setup process, while ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform features a higher initial configuration cost, highlighting a key difference between these two solutions.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
One Identity Safeguard
4.0 out of 5
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager offers flexibility and threat detection, appealing to those prioritizing cost-effectiveness and support. In comparison, One Identity Safeguard provides comprehensive access features, attracting buyers valuing robust security despite higher initial costs.
Download CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. One Identity Safeguard Report
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager has a simpler setup cost structure compared to One Identity Safeguard, which offers flexible but potentially more complex pricing options.
View comparison
Pricing
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager has a simpler setup cost structure compared to One Identity Safeguard, which offers flexible but potentially more complex pricing options.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager
4.2 out of 5
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager provides efficient threat detection and patch management. In comparison, CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager excels in privilege management and compliance. Ivanti is praised for straightforward deployment, while CyberArk's premium features justify its higher cost, offering long-term ROI benefits.
Download CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager Report
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager typically shows a lower setup cost, while CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager presents a higher price point.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager typically shows a lower setup cost, while CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager presents a higher price point.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
ManageEngine PAM360
3.7 out of 5
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager offers strong security and competitive pricing, appealing to those prioritizing access control with less complexity. In comparison, ManageEngine PAM360's advanced integration and scalability cater to businesses requiring expansive network management, justifying higher costs for comprehensive features.
Download CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. ManageEngine PAM360 Report
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager involves higher initial setup costs, while ManageEngine PAM360 offers a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting a key cost difference between these two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager involves higher initial setup costs, while ManageEngine PAM360 offers a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting a key cost difference between these two solutions.

Related categories

Privileged Access Management (PAM)
Endpoint Compliance
Anti-Malware Tools