Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs ManageEngine PAM360 comparison

CyberArk and ManageEngine are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. CyberArk is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.1, while ManageEngine is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.0. CyberArk holds a 3.9% mindshare in PAM, compared to ManageEngine’s 5.2% mindshare. Additionally, 82% of CyberArk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...
Read 30 CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager reviews
  • 1,405 Views
  • 987 Comparison Views
82% willing to recommend
ManageEngine PAM360
Read 4 ManageEngine PAM360 reviews
  • 1,569 Views
  • 1,138 Comparison Views
75% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2024

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and ManageEngine PAM360 compete in the privileged access management market. Based on user feedback, CyberArk stands out for its support and pricing satisfaction, while ManageEngine PAM360 is noted for its feature offerings and value.

Features: CyberArk is recognized for comprehensive security controls, ease of automation, and simplified deployment. ManageEngine PAM360 is valued for its broad feature set, extensive integration options, and scalability. Users prefer ManageEngine for its versatility.

Room for Improvement: CyberArk could improve reporting capabilities, integration with existing systems, and customization flexibility. ManageEngine PAM360 users highlight the need for better user accessibility, streamlined updates, and more intuitive interfaces.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CyberArk benefits from simplified deployment processes and strong customer support. ManageEngine PAM360, while slightly more complex to deploy, offers commendable post-deployment support and responsive service.

Pricing and ROI: CyberArk offers competitive initial setup costs with positive ROI feedback. ManageEngine PAM360's pricing is higher, yet the extensive features are seen as offering excellent value over time. Users view CyberArk as cost-effective initially, while ManageEngine presents long-term value.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. ManageEngine PAM360 Report (Updated: October 2024).
Buyer's Guide
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. ManageEngine PAM360
October 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
3.4
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager support is knowledgeable but has mixed feedback regarding response times and support accessibility.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
5.2
Users find CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager complex, costly, and difficult to maintain, citing outdated features and user-friendliness issues.
Sentiment score
8.0
ManageEngine PAM360 requires better Linux integration, multi-factor authentication, reduced latency, and comprehensive documentation with session logging features.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is scalable for diverse setups, praised for effective management, though massive implementations can be challenging.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
3.3
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager pricing is high, influenced by usage factors, with discounts for large enterprises, challenging for smaller businesses.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is stable, reliable, with high availability, excelling on Windows but has minor concerns on Linux.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.4
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager enhances security with features like password management, privilege delegation, application control, and centralized management.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
6th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
30
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Compliance (5th), Anti-Malware Tools (8th), Application Control (6th), Ransomware Protection (7th)
ManageEngine PAM360
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
14th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is 3.9%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine PAM360 is 5.2%, up from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
 

Featured Reviews

Kaspars Vasilevskis - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers integrated solutions and expands its capabilities through strategic acquisitions
Setting up CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager was challenging for me due to the involvement of multiple components. The process required a good understanding of each component and its configuration. It is not a straightforward setup, and familiarity with the system is crucial to ensure everything is correctly configured. I would rate the easiness of the initial setup as a six out of ten. The deployment of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager takes about a day. It is not as quick as some Linux, which can be up and running in just a couple of hours. CyberArk's deployment is more complex due to the various components that need to be set up and validated to ensure they work together seamlessly. Once the deployment is complete, you can then proceed with tasks like account onboarding.
Read full review
Prasanthraj PN - PeerSpot reviewer
An easy-to-deploy and affordable tool for access control monitoring
If I consider that most of the users are getting connected from a remote level and take into consideration that industries prefer to go for SaaS-based solutions and multi-factor authentication, I don't see any features associated with multi-factor authentication in ManageEngine PAM360. If ManageEngine PAM360 can introduce multi-factor authentication, then it would be great from a security aspect.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
8%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Retailer
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Looking for recommendations and a pros/cons template for software to detect insider threats
This is an inside-out --- outside-in --- inside-in question, as an insider can be an outsider as well. There is no short answer other than a blend of a PAM tool with Behavioral Analytics and Endpo...
See all answers
What do you like most about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?
The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?
The tool's pricing is reasonable for customers.
See all answers
What needs improvement with ManageEngine PAM360?
It should have better documentation about how to install, work and configure.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for ManageEngine PAM360?
Our clients use this solution for the rotation of keys and passwords. It is a part of logs.
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering ManageEngine PAM360?
We can install on the cloud for ManageEngine to manage the clients. If you have any configurations on the domain server for a Windows user, they would be able to manage passwords remotely. I recomm...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Compared 22% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Compared 17% of the time
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Compared 16% of the time
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Compared 9% of the time
Tanium vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
Tanium vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Compared 5% of the time
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Competitors
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs ManageEngine PAM360 Logo
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs ManageEngine PAM360
Compared 40% of the time
Delinea Secret Server vs ManageEngine PAM360 Logo
Delinea Secret Server vs ManageEngine PAM360
Compared 18% of the time
WALLIX Bastion vs ManageEngine PAM360 Logo
WALLIX Bastion vs ManageEngine PAM360
Compared 13% of the time
ARCON Privileged Access Management vs ManageEngine PAM360 Logo
ARCON Privileged Access Management vs ManageEngine PAM360
Compared 12% of the time
Fudo PAM vs ManageEngine PAM360 Logo
Fudo PAM vs ManageEngine PAM360
Compared 3% of the time
More ManageEngine PAM360 Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
November 2024
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager reportDownload CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager product report
Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
November 2024
ManageEngine PAM360 reportDownload ManageEngine PAM360 product report
 

Also Known As

Viewfinity
PAM360
 

Learn More

CyberArk
ManageEngine
 

Overview

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, a critical and foundational endpoint control addresses the underlying weaknesses of endpoint defenses against a privileged attacker and helps enterprises defend against these attacks through removing local admin rights, enforcing least privilege, and implementing foundational endpoint security controls across all Windows, macOS and Linux endpoints from hybrid to cloud environments.

Click here for a free 30 day trial: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager free trial

Comprehensive privileged access management solution
Privilege misuse is a top cybersecurity threat today that often results in expensive losses and can even cripple businesses. It's also one of the most popular attack vectors among hackers, because when successfully carried out, it provides free access to an enterprise's underbelly, often without raising any alarms until the damage is done.

ManageEngine PAM360 empowers enterprises looking to stay ahead of this growing risk with a robust privileged access management (PAM) program that ensures no privileged access pathway to mission-critical assets is left unmanaged, unknown, or unmonitored.

PAM360 is a comprehensive solution for businesses looking to incorporate PAM into their overall security operations. With PAM360's contextual integration capabilities, you can build a central console where different parts of your IT management system interconnect for deeper correlation of privileged access data and overall network data, facilitating meaningful inferences and quicker remedies.

Buyer's Guide
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. ManageEngine PAM360
October 2024
Free Report: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. ManageEngine PAM360
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. ManageEngine PAM360 and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. ManageEngine PAM360 report.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.