CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs ManageEngine PAM360 comparison

CyberArk and ManageEngine are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. CyberArk is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.4, while ManageEngine is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.0. CyberArk holds a 3.6% mindshare in PAM, compared to ManageEngine’s 4.6% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of CyberArk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

Read 36 CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager reviews

1,343 Views
946 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

ManageEngine PAM360

Read 5 ManageEngine PAM360 reviews

1,546 Views
1,087 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

ManageEngine PAM360

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2024

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and ManageEngine PAM360 compete in the privileged access management market. Based on user feedback, CyberArk stands out for its support and pricing satisfaction, while ManageEngine PAM360 is noted for its feature offerings and value.

Features: CyberArk is recognized for comprehensive security controls, ease of automation, and simplified deployment. ManageEngine PAM360 is valued for its broad feature set, extensive integration options, and scalability. Users prefer ManageEngine for its versatility.

Room for Improvement: CyberArk could improve reporting capabilities, integration with existing systems, and customization flexibility. ManageEngine PAM360 users highlight the need for better user accessibility, streamlined updates, and more intuitive interfaces.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CyberArk benefits from simplified deployment processes and strong customer support. ManageEngine PAM360, while slightly more complex to deploy, offers commendable post-deployment support and responsive service.

Pricing and ROI: CyberArk offers competitive initial setup costs with positive ROI feedback. ManageEngine PAM360's pricing is higher, yet the extensive features are seen as offering excellent value over time. Users view CyberArk as cost-effective initially, while ManageEngine presents long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. ManageEngine PAM360 Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. ManageEngine PAM360

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Compliance (4th), Anti-Malware Tools (5th), Application Control (5th), Ransomware Protection (6th)

ManageEngine PAM360

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

13th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is 3.6%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine PAM360 is 4.6%, up from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Sumit Chavan

Lead Consultant at Aujas Networks Pvt Ltd

Helps secure the infrastructure and control users with admin rights

There are many features that are currently missing. A customization option is required for certain policies. For instance, if we need to stop PowerShell scripting, we have to create a different policy for that. Being able to create a sub-level policy within a top-level policy would be good. Currently, no user-based policy option is available inside the EPM console. We can only create computer-based policies. The database is available, but there is a drawback in not being able to create local groups on the EPM console. We only have to depend on Active Directory. This limits infrastructure security as we depend on the Active Directory team to manage user groups. If they remove any users, we lose control. If we could create groups locally and block them or set specific policies, we would have more control. Local endpoint management is missing from the EPM site. Moreover, there is an issue with policies not running as expected when we make enhancements. We have to find multiple ways to whitelist applications or enhance policies.

Read full review

Prasanthraj PN

Sales Director at InnovationTQ

An easy-to-deploy and affordable tool for access control monitoring

If I consider that most of the users are getting connected from a remote level and take into consideration that industries prefer to go for SaaS-based solutions and multi-factor authentication, I don't see any features associated with multi-factor authentication in ManageEngine PAM360. If ManageEngine PAM360 can introduce multi-factor authentication, then it would be great from a security aspect.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"In terms of ROI, deploying CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager has secured the infrastructure, which saves money, time, and resources."

"The features I find most valuable are the endpoint privilege capabilities, which provide automatic protection to our IT environment."

"I have always found that CyberArk is a very tight, foolproof product compared to most other products available."

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager has significantly improved our security posture by preventing virus incidents and restricting users from downloading unwanted applications."

"I am impressed with the product's seamless integration. The PAM wallet and enterprise password wallet are good also good."

"It offers great performance."

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is entirely cloud-based, so no further upkeep is required."

"This is the number one product for privilege account security."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager pros

"Deployment is very quick, and only a one-time installation process is required for ManageEngine PAM360."

"PAM360 stands out due to its remote session recording capabilities, which allow us to track who accessed which server and identify any changes."

"We can use it remotely as well."

"Our clients use this solution for the rotation of keys and passwords. It is a part of logs."

Cons

"CyberArk should consider whitelisting important applications like PowerShell and DLL that are currently not allowed due to some malicious content."

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager could be improved by simplifying the administration process, specifically when setting up policies and applications."

"The price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required. The product's price should be made more flexible."

"The solution can be complex to use at times."

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager could be improved by simplifying the administration process, specifically when setting up policies and applications."

"I would like to see improvements in customization, particularly allowing the user more control over what is deleted."

"The CyberArk team is working on a feature to identify devices without the Endpoint Privilege Manager running, which is currently missing."

"CyberArk has some performance issues. For example, servers could not handle the solution when we first took CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager cons

"If you want a cost effective solution and very competitive pricing, you should go with this product."

"I don't see any features associated with multi-factor authentication in ManageEngine PAM360."

"I would rate the scalability at five out of ten. It's average."

"There could be improvement in latency and accessing resources for the product."

"PAM360's dashboard needs improvement for clearer presentations, similar to ManageEngine products like AD audit plus and Password Manager Plus, which offer a clearer picture."

"It should have better documentation about how to install, work and configure."

"PAM360's dashboard needs improvement for clearer presentations, similar to ManageEngine products like AD audit plus and Password Manager Plus, which offer a clearer picture."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay about $17 per user."

"Although I do not deal directly with the pricing, CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is costly compared to other solutions. However, it offers beneficial features."

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is slightly expensive, but costs can be negotiated to become more competitive."

"The price of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is expensive."

"Pricing depends on how many devices you use. Right now, on-premise, it costs us a little, but it's worth it. It seems like the cloud solution is much more expensive. We got this solution one year ago, and it's like we bought the solution, and now they are not going to support it on-premise anymore. We are in the implementation phase, and we missed this, and we already paid for the licenses. This is wasted time from my perspective, and CyberArk should be more customer-friendly."

"The professional services for one eight-hour day would be $1,800."

"I think that it was in the range of $200,000 that had to get approved."

"CyberArk has saved us 15% of our costs. They offer discounts due to trusted partnerships. We have been in the system for a long time."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager pricing and cost advice

"The product is less expensive than one of its competitors."

"Though I don't have the exact numbers related to the cost of the solution, I can say that it costs somewhere around INR 7,00,000 for ten licenses."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Looking for recommendations and a pros/cons template for software to detect insider threats

This is an inside-out --- outside-in --- inside-in question, as an insider can be an outsider as well. There is no short answer other than a blend of a PAM tool with Behavioral Analytics and Endpo...

See all answers

What do you like most about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?

The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is slightly expensive, but costs can be negotiated to become more competitive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine PAM360?

It should have better documentation about how to install, work and configure.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ManageEngine PAM360?

Our clients use this solution for the rotation of keys and passwords. It is a part of logs.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ManageEngine PAM360?

We can install on the cloud for ManageEngine to manage the clients. If you have any configurations on the domain server for a Windows user, they would be able to manage passwords remotely. I recomm...

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 24% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 18% of the time

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 15% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 9% of the time

Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 2% of the time

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Competitors

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs ManageEngine PAM360

Compared 36% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs ManageEngine PAM360

Compared 15% of the time

WALLIX Bastion vs ManageEngine PAM360

Compared 12% of the time

ARCON Privileged Access Management vs ManageEngine PAM360

Compared 10% of the time

Netwrix Privileged Access Management vs ManageEngine PAM360

Compared 3% of the time

More ManageEngine PAM360 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

February 2025

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager report

Download CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

January 2025

Download ManageEngine PAM360 product report

Also Known As

Viewfinity

PAM360

Overview

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, a critical and foundational endpoint control addresses the underlying weaknesses of endpoint defenses against a privileged attacker and helps enterprises defend against these attacks through removing local admin rights, enforcing least privilege, and implementing foundational endpoint security controls across all Windows, macOS and Linux endpoints from hybrid to cloud environments.

Click here for a free 30 day trial: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager free trial

CyberArk

Comprehensive privileged access management solution
Privilege misuse is a top cybersecurity threat today that often results in expensive losses and can even cripple businesses. It's also one of the most popular attack vectors among hackers, because when successfully carried out, it provides free access to an enterprise's underbelly, often without raising any alarms until the damage is done.

ManageEngine PAM360 empowers enterprises looking to stay ahead of this growing risk with a robust privileged access management (PAM) program that ensures no privileged access pathway to mission-critical assets is left unmanaged, unknown, or unmonitored.

PAM360 is a comprehensive solution for businesses looking to incorporate PAM into their overall security operations. With PAM360's contextual integration capabilities, you can build a central console where different parts of your IT management system interconnect for deeper correlation of privileged access data and overall network data, facilitating meaningful inferences and quicker remedies.

ManageEngine

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. ManageEngine PAM360

January 2025

Free Report: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. ManageEngine PAM360

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. ManageEngine PAM360 and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. ManageEngine PAM360 report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.