Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.6
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks offers ROI with fewer breaches, reduced incidents, enhanced security, and compliance benefits within 16 months.
Sentiment score
6.6
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager enhances security, reducing breach vulnerability, delivering complex yet crucial ROI and risk reduction benefits.
They appreciate the rich telemetry data from the solution, as it provides in-depth threat identification.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.5
Cortex XDR customer service receives mixed reviews, citing regional differences in responsiveness, communication, and expertise quality.
Sentiment score
6.6
CyberArk's support is valued and knowledgeable, though response times and accessibility could be improved for efficiency.
Every vendor has similar support; it depends on how the case is handled and raised.
We engage them when needed and receive prompt responses that typically resolve our issues.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks efficiently scales for medium to large businesses, supporting numerous users and endpoints seamlessly.
Sentiment score
7.6
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is praised for scalability, effectively managing diverse environments, despite some challenges with large-scale deployments.
We can set permissions per team or department, allowing some teams to elevate specific applications while others have different permissions.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Cortex XDR is highly stable and reliable, with user satisfaction scores between eight and ten out of ten.
Sentiment score
8.1
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is stable, reliable, highly rated, with notable Windows stability, despite upgrade-related downtime.
Cortex XDR is stable, offering high quality and reliable performance.
Since implementing it, we have not experienced any outages or stability issues.
 

Room For Improvement

Cortex XDR requires improved functionality, user interface, integration, and pricing, while addressing performance, false positives, and compatibility issues.
CyberArk needs UI improvements, better integration, admin tools, and enhanced features for performance, support, and user experience.
Cortex XDR could improve its sales support team, including better commission structures and referral programs.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager could be improved by simplifying the administration process, specifically when setting up policies and applications.
 

Setup Cost

Cortex XDR offers flexible but costly licensing, accommodating varying business sizes with yearly or monthly payment options.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is seen as costly yet reasonable, with varying pricing based on users and sessions.
Cortex XDR is perceived as expensive by some customers, yet offers dynamic pricing.
 

Valuable Features

Cortex XDR provides advanced threat detection, integration, and ease of use, excelling in real-time prevention and incident investigation.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager enhances enterprise security with features for management, integration, and threat protection, ensuring efficient access control.
It incorporates AI for normal behavior detection, distinguishing unusual operations.
 

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...
Ranking in Ransomware Protection
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
91
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (4th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (7th), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (4th)
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...
Ranking in Ransomware Protection
7th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Compliance (4th), Privileged Access Management (PAM) (5th), Anti-Malware Tools (5th), Application Control (6th)
 

Featured Reviews

Mohammad Qaw - PeerSpot reviewer
Perfect correlation and XDR capabilities for network traffic plus endpoint security
The solution should force customers to integrate with network traffic to see the full benefits of XDR. If you are not integrating it or feeding in your network traffic, then you are just buying a normal antivirus which doesn't make any sense. You are paying double the price to use the antivirus feature or to say you have XDR, but in reality you are not using it. The solution should include an on-premises option because some customers want only on-premises. It would be hard, but good to do if possible. Open XDR would be beneficial in the future. Right now, the solution is Closed XDR so cannot communicate with the few new vendors in the Open XDR market.
Anish R - PeerSpot reviewer
Foolproof and good for controlling access but can be expensive
I've worked in BeyondTrust, also. They have Asian-based solutions, and it's not as heavy as CyberArk. Since I have been working with CyberArk for some time, I feel a little bit more comfortable with CyberArk. BeyondTrust is also not that bad. However, they did not have all the capabilities that CyberArk was offering at that time. That said, this was maybe four or five years ago. I haven't explored anything after that. I'm sure a lot of things have changed. There used to be IBM Privilege Identity Manager as well, but it's not there anymore. Saviynt has its own solution as well. Basically, there are multiple solutions there, however, CyberArk was definitely been our choice for Privilege Identity Manager.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Ransomware Protection solutions are best for your needs.
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. The ability to reverse damage caused by ransomware with minimal interruptions to...
Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions that are very scalable, secure, and user-friendly. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto offers ...
How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface, applies behavioral-based endpoint protection and response, and includes risk-ba...
Looking for recommendations and a pros/cons template for software to detect insider threats
This is an inside-out --- outside-in --- inside-in question, as an insider can be an outsider as well. There is no short answer other than a blend of a PAM tool with Behavioral Analytics and Endpo...
What do you like most about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?
The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance.
 

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps
Viewfinity
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.