CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs One Identity Safeguard comparison

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and One Identity Safeguard are leading solutions in the endpoint security sector. CyberArk appears to have the upper hand in user satisfaction, particularly in pricing and support, whereas One Identity Safeguard is valued for its rich features that justify its higher cost.

Features: Users identify CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager for its integration capabilities, effective privilege management, and streamlined user controls. One Identity Safeguard stands out with its comprehensive session management, scalability, and robust security features.

Room for Improvement: CyberArk users suggest enhancements in reporting capabilities, simplified update processes, and more user-friendly interfaces. For One Identity Safeguard, improvements in response time, configuration simplicity, and user documentation are highlighted.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager offers straightforward deployment and responsive customer service, making it a good fit for fast implementation. One Identity Safeguard, despite requiring more complex setup, provides a comprehensive support framework appreciated by users.

Pricing and ROI: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is seen as cost-effective with its competitive setup costs and quick ROI. One Identity Safeguard, although higher in upfront costs, provides long-term value due to its extensive features, offering a justified investment for many organizations.