CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs One Identity Safeguard comparison

CyberArk and One Identity are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. CyberArk is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.1, while One Identity is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.3. CyberArk holds a 3.9% mindshare in PAM, compared to One Identity’s 4.5% mindshare. Additionally, 82% of CyberArk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of One Identity users who would recommend it.

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

Read 30 CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager reviews

1,405 Views
987 Comparison Views

82% willing to recommend

One Identity Safeguard

Read 40 One Identity Safeguard reviews

3,341 Views
1,365 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

One Identity Safeguard

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2024

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and One Identity Safeguard are leading solutions in the endpoint security sector. CyberArk appears to have the upper hand in user satisfaction, particularly in pricing and support, whereas One Identity Safeguard is valued for its rich features that justify its higher cost.

Features: Users identify CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager for its integration capabilities, effective privilege management, and streamlined user controls. One Identity Safeguard stands out with its comprehensive session management, scalability, and robust security features.

Room for Improvement: CyberArk users suggest enhancements in reporting capabilities, simplified update processes, and more user-friendly interfaces. For One Identity Safeguard, improvements in response time, configuration simplicity, and user documentation are highlighted.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager offers straightforward deployment and responsive customer service, making it a good fit for fast implementation. One Identity Safeguard, despite requiring more complex setup, provides a comprehensive support framework appreciated by users.

Pricing and ROI: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is seen as cost-effective with its competitive setup costs and quick ROI. One Identity Safeguard, although higher in upfront costs, provides long-term value due to its extensive features, offering a justified investment for many organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. One Identity Safeguard Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. One Identity Safeguard

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,763 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Compliance (5th), Anti-Malware Tools (8th), Application Control (6th), Ransomware Protection (7th)

One Identity Safeguard

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is 3.9%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of One Identity Safeguard is 4.5%, down from 5.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Kaspars Vasilevskis

Security Delivery Associate Manager at Accenture

Nov 20, 2023

Offers integrated solutions and expands its capabilities through strategic acquisitions

Setting up CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager was challenging for me due to the involvement of multiple components. The process required a good understanding of each component and its configuration. It is not a straightforward setup, and familiarity with the system is crucial to ensure everything is correctly configured. I would rate the easiness of the initial setup as a six out of ten. The deployment of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager takes about a day. It is not as quick as some Linux, which can be up and running in just a couple of hours. CyberArk's deployment is more complex due to the various components that need to be set up and validated to ensure they work together seamlessly. Once the deployment is complete, you can then proceed with tasks like account onboarding.

Read full review

Tor Nordhagen

Executive Director at Semaphore

Nov 22, 2023

Transparent mode for privileged sessions will greatly simplify our client's administrative situation

We're introducing the solution's transparent mode for privileged sessions. This is part of what the client hasn't used before. It will simplify their administrative situation greatly. So far, the rollout of this feature has been a seamless process, but we're still in the midst of rolling it out. The benefits will be on the risk side. Right now, the way accounts are managed, you don't necessarily know who is using an account. There's a shared admin account, and that's not a good thing. And those accounts are shared in wallets by several people. One of the real benefits of safeguarding here is that the client will have an absolute audit of who is using an administrative interface, whether it's server or network.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance."

"The solution's technical support is good."

"I like that you can remove the admin rights from the user's computer and have control over the environment. That means you can delete the local admins and grant them proper privileges with the console. So, they will get proper permissions for applications they need, but we don't have to do it. In the domain where we don't have control, the user can only do specified actions, but not all of them."

"Users can scale the solution."

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager (EPM) 's most valuable feature is its ability to manage user application privileges and protect against ransomware attacks by controlling access to specific files and applications."

"The most valuable feature of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is its high performance, it's the best identity security platform. The security is good. It's easy to showcase the feature and capabilities and compare it with other competitors. It competes well with other solutions. Additionally, it is a complete solution."

"It offers great performance."

"The most valuable features of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager are password management, session management, onboarding rules, platform customization, and safety management."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager pros

"Safeguard has the ability to record and retrieve in the full-video format."

"The whole product solves the privileged access management challenge for our company. We have a secure tunnel, a secure session manager, and automatic logging of sessions, which is good for forensic purposes. We have a rich level of logs and can trace what happened on which machine and see who did what."

"We don't need to use VPN for remote access."

"One Identity Safeguard is stable and provides great performance."

"The most valuable feature of One Identity Safeguard is the user-friendly interface."

"The system is easy to manage, as it is not a system that you will change everything all of a sudden. It evolves most of the time with customer requests."

"The initial setup is very easy."

"It is easy to manage. There is a very logical, clear user interface. Also, the integration of scripts is thoughtfully implemented. Overall, it's a nice product to manage."

More One Identity Safeguard pros

Cons

"For an experienced system implementer it will take approximately one day. However, for somebody who is inexperienced it may take up to five days."

"Compared to other tools like Linux, this solution isn't as user-friendly."

"CyberArk has some performance issues. For example, servers could not handle the solution when we first took CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager."

"It cannot be on-prem. It is only cloud-based. Sometimes, that's a restriction in terms of usage."

"The price of the solution should improve."

"It is hard to deal with technical support if you are not certified."

"The turnaround time of the support team is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"CyberArk meets clients' need very spot-on. It covers everything customers ask for. As for improvements, honestly, the feedback's been really positive. I haven't heard any specific areas that need work."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager cons

"We sometimes face issues with configuration and things like that, but we manage to solve them."

"We can't review or audit HTTP and HTTPS. This functionality should be added so that we can review and audit HTTP and HTTPS."

"We have feature requests and would like to see the turnaround times on those features to be faster."

"I just received a question from a customer in regards to a connection with Oracle OID. I tried to integrate Safeguard with the Oracle YAML as well as something else to manage the groups and users from a different system, like AD or LDAP. This one feature could be better. At this moment, the platform system can only use the integration with LDAP or AD. The software for research and development to create a connector to a YAML platform can be very complicated."

"Some of our users find the functionality a bit complex, and it could be made more user-friendly."

"I would like to see support for RDP over HTTPS so this product can be used in conjunction with the Microsoft terminal."

"We've had issues managing accounts and access to some data saved on the servers. Accounts are granted a new working certificate daily. We have an account to do it on APIs online and sync it with that. If the path changes at some point or someone changes the password, I don't know if it's from the Active Directory or what."

"The automated change of the passwords, which is now integrated, could be improved to be more flexible regarding different systems."

More One Identity Safeguard cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager has a very high price, so it's a one out of ten for me in terms of pricing."

"The price of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is expensive."

"I feel that the price of the product is nominal. It must be around 10 to 15 USD per installation. I rate the product price an eight to nine out of ten, where one is high price, and ten is low price."

"The tool's pricing is reasonable for customers."

"The solution requires an annual license to use it. There can be some extra costs in some cases."

"It is an expensive solution."

"I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten since the price can be too high for smaller businesses."

"The solution's pricing is reasonable compared to other vendors' products."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager pricing and cost advice

"It was definitely cheaper than the other two products that we evaluated."

"Safeguard is cheaper than CyberArk."

"The pricing is about $80,000 per 100 servers. There are few elective costs."

"Our licensing costs are on a yearly basis."

"The license is around $3,000 per month."

"The pricing depends on our perspective, our budget, and, of course, the competitors we are taking into account."

"Setup cost, pricing and licensing are all very expensive."

"They offer a fair price for a robust solution."

More One Identity Safeguard pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Computer Software Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Looking for recommendations and a pros/cons template for software to detect insider threats

This is an inside-out --- outside-in --- inside-in question, as an insider can be an outsider as well. There is no short answer other than a blend of a PAM tool with Behavioral Analytics and Endpo...

See all answers

What do you like most about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?

The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?

The tool's pricing is reasonable for customers.

See all answers

What do you like most about One Identity Safeguard?

The identity discovery is good, and the performance is pretty good value.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?

One Identity Safeguard is expensive. The license is around $3,000 per month.

See all answers

What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?

One Identity's support is not appropriately structured, and it has a lot of room to improve.

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 22% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 17% of the time

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 15% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 9% of the time

Tanium vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Competitors

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 39% of the time

WALLIX Bastion vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 13% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 11% of the time

BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 8% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs One Identity Safeguard

Compared 6% of the time

More One Identity Safeguard Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

November 2024

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager report

Download CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

One Identity Safeguard

October 2024

Download One Identity Safeguard product report

Also Known As

Viewfinity

No data available

Learn More

CyberArk

One Identity

Overview

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, a critical and foundational endpoint control addresses the underlying weaknesses of endpoint defenses against a privileged attacker and helps enterprises defend against these attacks through removing local admin rights, enforcing least privilege, and implementing foundational endpoint security controls across all Windows, macOS and Linux endpoints from hybrid to cloud environments.

Click here for a free 30 day trial: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager free trial

One Identity Safeguard manages and monitors privileged access, enhancing security with features like automatic session recording, real-time monitoring, and credential rotation. It integrates seamlessly, supports compliance with audit trails, and improves operational efficiency across organizations. This robust platform significantly bolsters security protocols while controlling sensitive operations.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Cavium

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. One Identity Safeguard

October 2024

Free Report: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. One Identity Safeguard

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. One Identity Safeguard and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. One Identity Safeguard report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.