Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.9
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager enhances security and reduces costs, despite challenges in quantifying precise ROI, with immediate benefits.
Sentiment score
5.8
Ivanti Endpoint Security enhances threat protection, reduces downtime, automates processes, saves costs, and improves operational efficiency.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.7
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager support varies; effectiveness depends on user experience, with inconsistent response times and complex contact methods.
Sentiment score
6.2
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager's support is generally good, with responsive technical teams but some desire more localized support.
They respond immediately to our inquiries, resolve issues promptly, and provide valuable guidance, especially in critical situations.
Earlier, we received support for normal tickets within a day, but now it takes one or two days to resolve issues.
We engage them when needed and receive prompt responses that typically resolve our issues.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager scales efficiently for small to massive deployments, supporting cloud and on-premise solutions with ease.
Sentiment score
7.7
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager is highly scalable and effective, managing thousands of endpoints for diverse businesses.
We can set permissions per team or department, allowing some teams to elevate specific applications while others have different permissions.
Scalability is excellent because it is SaaS-based.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is quite scalable.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is stable with high performance but occasionally experiences downtime during upgrades, especially on non-Windows systems.
Sentiment score
8.0
Ivanti Endpoint Security is stable, though some agent issues exist; auto-healing features help minimize downtime.
It is a robust solution that has effectively supported our environment without major issues.
Windows 10 and 11 are stable operating systems, and we are not facing issues, unlike with Windows 7 when bugs were prevalent.
Since implementing it, we have not experienced any outages or stability issues.
 

Room For Improvement

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager needs user-friendly enhancements, better integration, faster support, pricing adjustments, and improved threat detection tools.
Ivanti Endpoint Security needs more intuitive onboarding, improved troubleshooting, better reporting, and enhanced integration, customization, and ease of use.
Local endpoint management is missing from the EPM site.
Some connections to third-party analyzing engines, like Palo Alto and others, which can check hashes and similar functionalities, were working in the self-hosted version of EPM yet are not supported in the software as a service version.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager could be improved by simplifying the administration process, specifically when setting up policies and applications.
 

Setup Cost

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is costly, especially for small businesses, with potential discounts for large enterprises.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is slightly expensive, but costs can be negotiated to become more competitive.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is costly compared to other solutions.
 

Valuable Features

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager ensures security and compliance through admin control, ransomware protection, and advanced credential analytics.
Ivanti Endpoint Security offers unified management, patching, and asset control with a user-friendly interface and compliance with security best practices.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager effectively reduces malicious content in applications by allowing us to identify and block dangerous applications.
I can see an incident on the board, and it is clear to analyze what is happening on the endpoint devices.
The most valuable feature is the ability to control users with admin rights.
 

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...
Ranking in Endpoint Compliance
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
35
Ranking in other categories
Privileged Access Management (PAM) (4th), Anti-Malware Tools (5th), Application Control (5th), Ransomware Protection (7th)
Ivanti Endpoint Security fo...
Ranking in Endpoint Compliance
6th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (43rd), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (11th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Endpoint Compliance category, the mindshare of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is 6.9%, up from 6.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager is 8.0%, down from 9.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Compliance
 

Featured Reviews

Sumit Chavan - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps secure the infrastructure and control users with admin rights
There are many features that are currently missing. A customization option is required for certain policies. For instance, if we need to stop PowerShell scripting, we have to create a different policy for that. Being able to create a sub-level policy within a top-level policy would be good. Currently, no user-based policy option is available inside the EPM console. We can only create computer-based policies. The database is available, but there is a drawback in not being able to create local groups on the EPM console. We only have to depend on Active Directory. This limits infrastructure security as we depend on the Active Directory team to manage user groups. If they remove any users, we lose control. If we could create groups locally and block them or set specific policies, we would have more control. Local endpoint management is missing from the EPM site. Moreover, there is an issue with policies not running as expected when we make enhancements. We have to find multiple ways to whitelist applications or enhance policies.
Sanjay Mukhopadhyay - PeerSpot reviewer
A solid low-code builder that helps build workflows and processes in a variety of settings
It's not complex, but you need certified skills for setup to be easy. It is different for an L1 resource, who has a basic understanding of things and may not be a developer who deeply understands how to build up the solution, where that understanding is present with an L3 or L2 resource. For maintenance, you need at least one skill set for each module. You would need one for UEM and one more for MDM, which is the ideal way to do it unless you have people who know the modules in and out. We have a larger team for IT service management because the demand for IT service management is high, but we can see that for other modules as well now.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Compliance solutions are best for your needs.
842,388 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
8%
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Looking for recommendations and a pros/cons template for software to detect insider threats
This is an inside-out --- outside-in --- inside-in question, as an insider can be an outsider as well. There is no short answer other than a blend of a PAM tool with Behavioral Analytics and Endpo...
What do you like most about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?
The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is slightly expensive, but costs can be negotiated to become more competitive.
What do you like most about Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager?
The most valuable features of the solution are accessing the data through the mobiles and meeting with the compliance for security best practices.
What needs improvement with Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager?
We've experienced challenges adapting Ivanti to new Windows versions, such as Windows 11, where integration delays have been notable. It could benefit from faster integration with new technologies,...
What is your primary use case for Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager?
We use Ivanti Endpoint Security for patch management, remote control functionalities, and asset tracking.
 

Also Known As

Viewfinity
LANDesk Security Suite, Ivanti Endpoint Security
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Otkritie Bank, France T_l_visions, MBDA, 21st Century Oncology, Sealed Air Corporation, Granite School District, The Bunker, The MAC Services Group, Adams 12 Five Star Schools District, AlliedBarton Security Services, Mohawk Industries, Sun National Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
842,388 professionals have used our research since 2012.