Adaptiva vs Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Adaptiva and Ivanti are both solutions in the Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) category. Additionally, 100% of Adaptiva users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ivanti users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 4, 2026

Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager and Adaptiva compete in the endpoint management category. Adaptiva edges out Ivanti in feature sophistication, making it a preferred choice despite Ivanti's better pricing and support feedback.

Features: Ivanti Endpoint Security is known for its robust security features, seamless integration with Microsoft environments, and its holistic approach to endpoint management. Adaptiva stands out with its patch management capabilities, global scalability, and advanced endpoint coverage for large organizations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ivanti is recognized for its smooth deployment in Windows-centric systems and reliable customer support for quick issue resolution. Adaptiva offers minimalistic client setup and real-time support but has less accessible customer service compared to Ivanti.

Pricing and ROI: Ivanti's competitive pricing with lower initial setup costs leads to a quicker ROI. Adaptiva involves a higher upfront investment justified by its extensive functionality and scalability, providing long-term value for enterprises with complex IT needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Unified Endpoint Management (UEM)

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 912,930 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Intune

Featured Reviews

Anumula Hitesh

Senior Business Development Executive at Digitaltrack

Centralized device management has automated onboarding and improves remote security compliance

One thing I feel Microsoft Intune could improve is troubleshooting visibility. In many cases, when a policy or application deployment fails, the error messages are a bit generic. So, admins still spend time checking logs manually or testing on devices one by one. Compared to the simplicity of deployment, troubleshooting sometimes feels less mature. I also think reporting and real-time monitoring could be stronger. The dashboard gives useful information, but in large environments, many teams still depend on additional tools or scripts for deeper reporting and analytics. If I had to focus on one area first, I would probably choose troubleshooting and reporting. Deployment through Microsoft Intune is generally straightforward, but when something fails, identifying the exact root cause can still take more time than expected. Error messages are sometimes too generic, and admins often have to dig through logs, sync status, or multiple portals to understand what actually happened. I think user experience and policy management could also improve further. Microsoft Intune has become much better over the years, but sometimes the admin portal still feels fragmented because certain configurations open in different sections or redirect to older interfaces. For new admins, especially, it can take time to understand where everything is located. Another thing is policy conflict handling. In larger organizations, multiple device policies, compliance rules, and configuration profiles can overlap. When conflicts happen, the visibility is not always very clear, so admins spend time figuring out which policy actually won or caused the issue.

Read full review

Vikram

Works at Colgate-Palmolive

Really good in terms of content delivery and network bandwidth optimization

Using Adaptiva is really straightforward. Users need to have some end-user computing and networking knowledge to use the solution. The project or implementation team we worked with had good technical knowledge. I really liked the solution's performance. Adaptiva helped us with network bandwidth optimization and content delivery. Overall, I rate the solution eight and a half out of ten.

Read full review

Sanjay Mukhopadhyay

Director - Sales & Operations - India at Intertec Systems

A solid low-code builder that helps build workflows and processes in a variety of settings

It's not complex, but you need certified skills for setup to be easy. It is different for an L1 resource, who has a basic understanding of things and may not be a developer who deeply understands how to build up the solution, where that understanding is present with an L3 or L2 resource. For maintenance, you need at least one skill set for each module. You would need one for UEM and one more for MDM, which is the ideal way to do it unless you have people who know the modules in and out. We have a larger team for IT service management because the demand for IT service management is high, but we can see that for other modules as well now.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"My advice for those implementing Microsoft Intune is to proceed with it; there is no other software that can perform the job better, and Microsoft offers extensive experience with a mature ecosystem, so I recommend going for it."

"Overall, Microsoft Intune has helped me manage devices more efficiently while maintaining better security and compliance standards across the organization."

"The thing I appreciate most about Microsoft Intune is that the management of the devices was very simplified. We have all machines connected to it at all times, whether they are in the office or working from home."

"It's cloud-based with no need for on-premise infrastructure, you can access it anywhere and start working on it, and you will have the record of data in your hand anytime if you need it quickly."

"If they have Office 365 or Azure, Intune is by far the best choice."

"Microsoft Intune has saved me about 30% of my time through streamlined processes and efficient resource management."

"We are able to deliver applications fast to our mobile workloads so that users can make use of it instantly."

"It is a cloud-based service. It is easy to use and offers privacy."

More Microsoft Intune pros

"Adaptiva is really good in terms of content delivery and network bandwidth optimization."

"The most valuable features of the solution are accessing the data through the mobiles and meeting with the compliance for security best practices."

"Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager is cloud-based, which aids in deployment."

"The best part about Ivanti and Matrix 42 is that they are low-code solution builders with drag-and-drop capabilities regarding service management."

"The key differentiator is that it manages mobile devices and laptops in the same console. Windows and Linux are on the same console. This is the only product that does this. It's really the best in the industry."

"The product has good stability."

"The solution's most valuable features are its patch management functionality and provisioning."

"The most valuable feature of Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager, which my company mainly uses, is patching. Another valuable feature of Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager is that it allows you to view the inventory list of the different machines."

"Patching and remediation are the strongest features."

More Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager [EOL] pros

Cons

"The scalability could be improved, and like most other MDM products, Intune is good but not 100% there yet."

"I expect Microsoft Intune to have more features in the cloud because there are two major functionalities that we need to be added. This is software metering and license management. These functionalities, for now, must be on-premise. For this purpose, we have set up a SQL Server and I hope that in near future this option will be in the cloud in Microsoft Intune."

"When we implemented Intune, it would have been helpful if Microsoft had provided some videos or data about Intune."

"It's the granularity: 'Is your firewall on? Is BitLocker on?' It's not amazing granularity. But I've looked into other products, like Duo, and they're all similar."

"Having a dedicated configuration server that assists in modifying the configuration service, and creating personalized structures, interfaces, and web services could enhance usability."

"Intune has limited integration with non-Microsoft solutions."

"Its configuration is fairly complicated. You have to do quite a bit of discovery to be able to deploy it for a customer. You have to ask them a lot of questions. So, its initial deployment is the biggest challenge. They should make it easier to deploy with the use of Wizards or something else. During the deployment stage, there could be profiles for the customers who are particularly wanting to use certain feature sets of Intune."

"I'd like some more reporting so that I don't have to delve into PowerShell and I can pull more of the local device information such as memory, apps installed, etc. It would be nice to be able to see the apps that are present there but might not be managed. For example, if they installed 7Zip, it could report that back via an installed program or feature to see what was currently installed."

More Microsoft Intune cons

"It would be good if Adaptiva had everything on the cloud rather than having one server on-premises."

"The solution needs a complete overhaul or makeover. It gets stuck sometimes because they're focusing on the cloud UEM stuff rather than paying as much attention to that particular piece. The ease of use could be improved. It combines many different functionalities that you would need multiple servers like SCCM. If I wanted to train people, I’d move to a higher level from an Apache architect. There are five or six different products. So, training functional staff to use the product can be challenging because it can sometimes be cumbersome. Reporting is challenging. We use Avanti extraction to report off an endpoint. We don't use the reporting because of the need for more functionality, granularity, or customization."

"When you open a new mobile, you automatically come onboard the mobile on the Ivanti platform but it needs some improvements."

"Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager's support provided to its users by the vendor is one area that needs to improve."

"Some of the GUI features need improvement. In particular, navigation could be better optimized for quick navigation by the user."

"It could benefit from faster integration with new technologies, such as quicker adaptation to Windows updates. Additionally, more advanced customization options would be valuable."

"If I want to integrate the solution with any other solution, pushing the policies from the Ivanti side is a bit tough."

"One of the features that Ivanti could improve is patching for non-Windows settings, such as Linux and Ubuntu."

"An area for improvement in Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager is reporting. It's lacking. For example, Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager reports should tell you if the agent is up to date, if the security patch is updated, etc."

More Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager [EOL] cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Based on the features that it gives, it is cost-efficient. It is not necessarily on the expensive side of the scale. It provides a hefty number of features that any organization would want. It is in a good price range."

"Its price is in the medium range. It is acceptable because you're paying for the features. I am not aware of any additional costs."

"It's affordable for the protection it gives. There are no additional costs."

"Intune's pricing is competitive. For example, the license of Blackberry's Enterprise Mobility Suite was costly, but Intune is affordable. It is included as an additional feature when you buy security enhancements for your organization. For example, let's say I have fifty users in my organization and all of them are using Microsoft cloud services, like Teams, Office 365, and OneDrive."

"Its price is quite okay. I wish they provide certain additional features with the same license."

"The cost is handled through our Office 365 license, so I have yet to be able to compare it directly with other tools in its class."

"I rate Intune five out of 10 for pricing. It's expensive."

"The overall pricing of Microsoft Intune is good for companies that have big IT budgets, 3,000 or more users and devices."

More Microsoft Intune pricing and cost advice

Information not available

"The product is expensive."

"On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the highest, and one is the cheapest, I rate its pricing a five."

"Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager is more expensive than some of the products I've used. It follows module-based licensing, so it would be more costly if you had more modules. Your costs depend on what modules you need."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is low and ten is high, I rate the solution's pricing ten out of ten."

"The solution is pretty expensive."

"The pricing is relatively high compared to some competitors."

"The licensing is based on assets for MDM or EM, where you need one license per asset. The license is annual, and it is not very expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

912,930 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

University

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	192
Midsize Enterprise	62
Large Enterprise	187

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

How does Microsoft Intune compare with VMware Workspace One?

Microsoft Intune is a great tool for managing a mobile device fleet while keeping access control. The solution makes ...

See all answers

What are the pros and cons of Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune is a great configuration management tool and has a lot of good things going for it. Here are some of...

See all answers

How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager?

Some of the GUI features need improvement. In particular, navigation could be better optimized for quick navigation b...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager?

I use Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager ( /products/ivanti-endpoint-security-for-endpoint-manager-reviews...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager?

I rate the solution eight out of ten overall. Among the AI features, it's used for discovery and remediation. The nav...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM MaaS360 vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 12% of the time

Jamf Pro vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 9% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 3% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft Intune Competitors

Nexthink vs Adaptiva

Compared 22% of the time

Tanium vs Adaptiva

Compared 14% of the time

BigFix vs Adaptiva

Compared 10% of the time

NinjaOne vs Adaptiva

Compared 10% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Adaptiva

Compared 7% of the time

More Adaptiva Competitors

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

BigFix vs Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

Tanium vs Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

Idira Endpoint Privilege Manager vs Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager [EOL]

Compared 4% of the time

More Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Intune

August 2026

Download Microsoft Intune product report

Buyer's Guide

Unified Endpoint Management (UEM)

September 2026

Download Adaptiva product report

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager [EOL]

September 2026

Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager [EOL] report

Download Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager [EOL] product report

Also Known As

Intune, MS Intune, Microsoft Endpoint Manager

No data available

LANDesk Security Suite, Ivanti Endpoint Security

Overview

Microsoft Intune is a cloud-based service designed for device management, security, and compliance. It supports automation and facilitates endpoint management for Windows, iOS, and Android devices, ensuring data protection and efficient policy enforcement.

Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with tools like Windows Autopilot to automate device setup and deployment. Integrated with Azure Active Directory, it enhances policy management while providing robust reporting and analytics tools for compliance tracking. Despite its intuitive interface aimed at simplifying navigation and device security management, there are challenges such as compatibility issues with Linux and Mac, limited policy support for Android, and demands for better third-party integration. It's widely used for both corporate-owned devices and BYOD scenarios in dynamic IT environments.

What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?

Windows Autopilot: Automates device setup for rapid deployment.
Azure Active Directory Integration: Enhances user policy management.
Reporting and Analytics: Improves compliance visibility.
Mobile Application Management: Ensures app security without compromising personal data.
Cloud-Based Management: Allows management from any location.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Time Efficiency: Automation reduces time in policy enforcement and configuration updates.
Enhanced Security: Ensures data protection across corporate-owned and BYOD devices.
Improved Compliance: Advanced reporting tools enhance compliance visibility.
Flexible Management: Cloud-based nature supports management from any location.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with regulatory standards. Manufacturing sectors utilize Intune for managing a distributed workforce across global locations, while educational institutions employ it to secure and manage devices in learning environments supporting both students and faculty.

Microsoft

Adaptiva provides cutting-edge endpoint management solutions, enhancing security and efficiency with scalable technologies suitable for enterprises looking to optimize IT operations through robust infrastructure and advanced automation capabilities.

Adaptiva is widely recognized for its powerful, scalable solutions that cater to large-scale enterprises seeking enhanced security, efficiency, and automation. With an infrastructure designed to optimize IT operations, Adaptiva addresses the needs of dynamic environments, delivering innovative features that support business growth and operational excellence. These capabilities make Adaptiva a preferred choice for organizations looking to streamline endpoint management.

What features make Adaptiva stand out?

P2P Content Delivery: Efficiently delivers large content across networks without server overload.
Automated Patch Management: Ensures timely and accurate updates to protect endpoints.
Scalable Architecture: Maintains performance by accommodating growing organizational demands.
Advanced Security Protocols: Protects sensitive data with state-of-the-art security measures.

What benefits should users focus on in reviews?

Improved Operational Efficiency: Reduces time and resources required for IT management.
Cost Reduction: Minimizes server maintenance with peer-to-peer technologies.
Enhanced Security: Provides reliable protection against vulnerabilities.
Increased Scalability: Adapts to growing needs without compromising functionality.

In industries like healthcare and financial services, Adaptiva is particularly beneficial due to its ability to support highly regulated environments. The platform offers significant enhancements in data protection and compliance management, resulting in secure operations and streamlined processes that adhere to strict industry standards, ensuring reliable and efficient service delivery.

Adaptiva

Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager combines a powerful vulnerability database with cloud-based deployment, facilitating mobile and OS management while enhancing security.

The platform features efficient patch management, remote control, and data access via mobile devices. Its unified console supports asset tracking across Windows, Mac, and Android, improving security patching processes. With inventory management, low-code workflow builders, built-in compliance, and an appealing UI, it manages thousands of devices, though it requires improvements in mobile onboarding, agent troubleshooting, and non-Windows patching. Some challenges exist with policy integration and IT tool integration, while comprehensive training is essential due to its wide range of functionalities.

What are the key features of Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager?

Unified Console: Streamlines management of mobile devices and operating systems.
Cloud-Based Deployment: Simplifies setup and reduces overhead.
Vulnerability Database: Enhances identification and patching of security risks.
Remote Control: Facilitates device management and data access remotely.
Low-Code Workflow Builders: Allows easy customization without extensive coding.

Which benefits should users expect when evaluating Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager?

Improved Security Compliance: Ensures alignment with security best practices.
Operational Efficiency: Automates patch deployment and asset tracking.
User Satisfaction: Gains from an intuitive and visually appealing interface.
Multi-OS Support: Manages Windows, Mac, and Android devices effectively.

Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager is implemented across industries for enhanced security patching, mobile device management, and data compliance. Companies utilize its features for managing personal and corporate data separately to prevent data leaks and breaches. The system enables efficient management of device fleets, though Mac management has noted limitations.

Ivanti

Sample Customers

Mitchells and Buzzers, Callaway

Information Not Available

Otkritie Bank, France T_l_visions, MBDA, 21st Century Oncology, Sealed Air Corporation, Granite School District, The Bunker, The MAC Services Group, Adams 12 Five Star Schools District, AlliedBarton Security Services, Mohawk Industries, Sun National Bank

Buyer's Guide

Unified Endpoint Management (UEM)

September 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, ManageEngine, IBM and others in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM). Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

912,930 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) vendors.

We monitor all Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.