Adaptiva vs Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager comparison

Adaptiva and Ivanti are both solutions in the Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) category. Adaptiva is ranked #24, while Ivanti is ranked #25. Adaptiva holds a 1.8% mindshare in UEM, compared to Ivanti’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Adaptiva users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ivanti users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Adaptiva and Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, ManageEngine, Omnissa and others in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM).

To learn more, read our detailed Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) Report (Updated: July 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Unified Endpoint Management (UEM)

July 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 907,768 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Intune

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Intune is 19.6%, down from 30.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Adaptiva is 1.8%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager is 2.1%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Intune	19.6%
Adaptiva	1.8%
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager	2.1%
Other	76.5%

Unified Endpoint Management (UEM)

Featured Reviews

OluwashileAdeniyi

Senior Infrastructure Security Engineer at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

Centralized endpoint security has improved and supports hybrid work and BYOD policies

Regarding what I dislike about Microsoft Intune and its downsides, I would say that more Mac controls are needed because we have limited Mac and Linux control. When comparing controls and policies between Windows, Mac, and Linux, Windows has almost everything you can think of, while Mac and Linux have limited types of control. You cannot implement certain things on Mac and Linux that you can on Windows. The limited controls are a major issue. Additionally, if Microsoft could find a way to embed servers into Microsoft Intune, that would be beneficial. Microsoft Intune is not really designed for servers or Windows servers. It is more tailored towards Windows 11 and Windows 10 operating systems. Windows servers are not fully supported. Enterprise organizations usually have both servers and endpoints, which are users' workstations. For servers, most people look for other solutions such as SCCM, which is Configuration Manager. However, SCCM is what Microsoft Intune is trying to replace. Both SCCM and Microsoft Intune belong to Microsoft. Microsoft is trying to transition organizations into Microsoft Intune, the native cloud solution. However, because this update is still in process, servers are not fully compatible with Microsoft Intune and cannot be managed by it. The current policy that has emerged from issues with clients is what they call co-management, which is relatively new, and I do not know if adoption is significant. Many legacy or older customers who have been using these products for decades still have SCCM. When it is time for them to manage their Windows devices, they use what is called cloud attach. Cloud attach is a term whereby your SCCM is connected to your Microsoft Intune. Most people do not know about it, but I have deployed it for several organizations. Cloud attach and co-management work together so that your device is in SCCM, but some policies are pushed from Microsoft Intune. It is like two different solutions working hand in hand. That is what they call co-management. Microsoft Intune does not bring all of your endpoint and security management tools into one place, which is the goal and how it should be. However, as I mentioned, servers are not included. If we talk about end users, Microsoft Intune does bring all your devices together. In a typical enterprise environment, you have end users with workstations, laptops, company-issued phones, and bring your own devices. You can create policies for all of these. However, for the backend, your servers do not have much coverage. Servers are not really covered by Microsoft Intune in that way.

Read full review

Vikram

Works at Colgate-Palmolive

Really good in terms of content delivery and network bandwidth optimization

Using Adaptiva is really straightforward. Users need to have some end-user computing and networking knowledge to use the solution. The project or implementation team we worked with had good technical knowledge. I really liked the solution's performance. Adaptiva helped us with network bandwidth optimization and content delivery. Overall, I rate the solution eight and a half out of ten.

Read full review

Chris Reece

Manager, Application Support at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees

A security solution to manage devices with patching and remediation feature

The solution needs a complete overhaul or makeover. It gets stuck sometimes because they're focusing on the cloud UEM stuff rather than paying as much attention to that particular piece. The ease of use could be improved. It combines many different functionalities that you would need multiple servers like SCCM. If I wanted to train people, I’d move to a higher level from an Apache architect. There are five or six different products. So, training functional staff to use the product can be challenging because it can sometimes be cumbersome. Reporting is challenging. We use Avanti extraction to report off an endpoint. We don't use the reporting because of the need for more functionality, granularity, or customization.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Microsoft Intune impacts my organization positively by saving significant time via faster onboarding; there is no requirement for manual imaging or setup."

"I believe that the solution is actually in Gartner's top quadrant at the moment for mobile device management."

"It is a cloud-based service. It is easy to use and offers privacy."

"Microsoft Endpoint Manager's patch management has been the most helpful to us."

"Microsoft Intune has broad capabilities, particularly with mobile device management, with excellent management features like the ability to push configuration policies to all devices across the company and manage them effectively, strong configuration and compliance capabilities, and valuable application management that centralizes applications in one place and makes configuring or deploying them much easier."

"Remote control is the feature I like the most, as I can take control of devices so that we can work hands-on and create access with access restrictions."

"This improved control and visibility has helped my organization by reducing risks, saving time, and making compliance easier."

"I have seen approximately a sixty to seventy percent improvement in efficiency and time savings since using Microsoft Intune."

More Microsoft Intune pros

"Adaptiva is really good in terms of content delivery and network bandwidth optimization."

"Patching and remediation are the strongest features."

"The most valuable features of the solution are accessing the data through the mobiles and meeting with the compliance for security best practices."

"The most valuable feature of Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager, which my company mainly uses, is patching. Another valuable feature of Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager is that it allows you to view the inventory list of the different machines."

"The key differentiator is that it manages mobile devices and laptops in the same console. Windows and Linux are on the same console. This is the only product that does this. It's really the best in the industry."

"The solution's most valuable features are its patch management functionality and provisioning."

"Ivanti is really good. They have a very good vulnerability database in which even if it is used for other products like BMC or Microsoft, the vulnerabilities and patching database is well filtered and very well documented."

"It provides security features for unified endpoint management."

"Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager is cloud-based, which aids in deployment."

More Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager pros

Cons

"Microsoft Intune needs to support out of the box Apple Managed Device and Apple Business Managed Device with zero-touch deployment capabilities, which is something competitors provide."

"The add-ons must be integrated into the solution."

"During the onboarding of Microsoft Intune, we faced the problem that the policies were not getting synced."

"Historically, Group Policy has simplified the management of various items, such as printer and drive mappings and while Intune offers workarounds, it lacks native support for these functionalities. This is an area I believe needs improvement."

"We would like to see the ability to use multiple personas on a device, similar to Samsung Knox, included in future updates."

"It would be better if I could integrate it with my core group policy. I would like to have a group policy in my current environment, which has strict control, but those things are still missing. Although it has maximum compliance and security, it's not available on-premise."

"Reporting can be better. Only global administrators can see detailed reports at the moment, and I don't want to use the global admin."

"I would like to see the ability to deploy custom packages as a Windows 64-bit package, as opposed to the Windows 32-bit, which is the only one available now."

More Microsoft Intune cons

"It would be good if Adaptiva had everything on the cloud rather than having one server on-premises."

"One of the features that Ivanti could improve is patching for non-Windows settings, such as Linux and Ubuntu."

"Some of the GUI features need improvement. In particular, navigation could be better optimized for quick navigation by the user."

"An area for improvement in Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager is reporting. It's lacking. For example, Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager reports should tell you if the agent is up to date, if the security patch is updated, etc."

"When you open a new mobile, you automatically come onboard the mobile on the Ivanti platform but it needs some improvements."

"It could benefit from faster integration with new technologies, such as quicker adaptation to Windows updates. Additionally, more advanced customization options would be valuable."

"The solution needs a complete overhaul or makeover. It gets stuck sometimes because they're focusing on the cloud UEM stuff rather than paying as much attention to that particular piece. The ease of use could be improved. It combines many different functionalities that you would need multiple servers like SCCM. If I wanted to train people, I’d move to a higher level from an Apache architect. There are five or six different products. So, training functional staff to use the product can be challenging because it can sometimes be cumbersome. Reporting is challenging. We use Avanti extraction to report off an endpoint. We don't use the reporting because of the need for more functionality, granularity, or customization."

"The product's blocking definition needs improvement."

"If I want to integrate the solution with any other solution, pushing the policies from the Ivanti side is a bit tough."

More Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We use Defender ATP and E5 licenses."

"The cost is handled through our Office 365 license, so I have yet to be able to compare it directly with other tools in its class."

"In terms of the product price and licensing costs, my company finds the product to be reasonably priced."

"While Microsoft Intune boasts a wide range of features, its user-friendliness and bundled licensing cost are key considerations for me."

"The cost of the license and the features are justified for myself as a technical person."

"We don't pay for Intune because it is bundled with the premium subscription to Office 365. It includes Intune and Defender. I don't have to buy two extra products to manage my enterprise."

"Microsoft Intune is included in the E5 license at no additional cost."

"I recently got to know that the AD P1 license is compulsory to use Intune Autopilot, which was surprising for me. Earlier, this was not the case. It is the wrong thing to do. We now need to purchase AD P1 licenses for us and for our customers. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing."

More Microsoft Intune pricing and cost advice

Information not available

"On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the highest, and one is the cheapest, I rate its pricing a five."

"The product is expensive."

"The licensing is based on assets for MDM or EM, where you need one license per asset. The license is annual, and it is not very expensive."

"The solution is pretty expensive."

"Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager is more expensive than some of the products I've used. It follows module-based licensing, so it would be more costly if you had more modules. Your costs depend on what modules you need."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is low and ten is high, I rate the solution's pricing ten out of ten."

"The pricing is relatively high compared to some competitors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

907,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

University

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	193
Midsize Enterprise	61
Large Enterprise	186

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

How does Microsoft Intune compare with VMware Workspace One?

Microsoft Intune is a great tool for managing a mobile device fleet while keeping access control. The solution makes ...

See all answers

What are the pros and cons of Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune is a great configuration management tool and has a lot of good things going for it. Here are some of...

See all answers

How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager?

Some of the GUI features need improvement. In particular, navigation could be better optimized for quick navigation b...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager?

I use Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager ( /products/ivanti-endpoint-security-for-endpoint-manager-reviews...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager?

I rate the solution eight out of ten overall. Among the AI features, it's used for discovery and remediation. The nav...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM MaaS360 vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 11% of the time

Jamf Pro vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 10% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 3% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft Intune Competitors

Nexthink vs Adaptiva

Compared 23% of the time

Tanium vs Adaptiva

Compared 13% of the time

NinjaOne vs Adaptiva

Compared 9% of the time

BigFix vs Adaptiva

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs Adaptiva

Compared 2% of the time

More Adaptiva Competitors

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager

Compared 10% of the time

BigFix vs Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager

Compared 9% of the time

Tanium vs Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager

Compared 8% of the time

Idira Endpoint Privilege Manager vs Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager

Compared 4% of the time

More Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Intune

July 2026

Download Microsoft Intune product report

Buyer's Guide

Unified Endpoint Management (UEM)

July 2026

Download Adaptiva product report

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager

July 2026

Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager report

Download Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager product report

Also Known As

Intune, MS Intune, Microsoft Endpoint Manager

No data available

LANDesk Security Suite, Ivanti Endpoint Security

Overview

Microsoft Intune is a cloud-based service designed for device management, security, and compliance. It supports automation and facilitates endpoint management for Windows, iOS, and Android devices, ensuring data protection and efficient policy enforcement.

Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with tools like Windows Autopilot to automate device setup and deployment. Integrated with Azure Active Directory, it enhances policy management while providing robust reporting and analytics tools for compliance tracking. Despite its intuitive interface aimed at simplifying navigation and device security management, there are challenges such as compatibility issues with Linux and Mac, limited policy support for Android, and demands for better third-party integration. It's widely used for both corporate-owned devices and BYOD scenarios in dynamic IT environments.

What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?

Windows Autopilot: Automates device setup for rapid deployment.
Azure Active Directory Integration: Enhances user policy management.
Reporting and Analytics: Improves compliance visibility.
Mobile Application Management: Ensures app security without compromising personal data.
Cloud-Based Management: Allows management from any location.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Time Efficiency: Automation reduces time in policy enforcement and configuration updates.
Enhanced Security: Ensures data protection across corporate-owned and BYOD devices.
Improved Compliance: Advanced reporting tools enhance compliance visibility.
Flexible Management: Cloud-based nature supports management from any location.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with regulatory standards. Manufacturing sectors utilize Intune for managing a distributed workforce across global locations, while educational institutions employ it to secure and manage devices in learning environments supporting both students and faculty.

Microsoft

Adaptiva provides cutting-edge endpoint management solutions, enhancing security and efficiency with scalable technologies suitable for enterprises looking to optimize IT operations through robust infrastructure and advanced automation capabilities.

Adaptiva is widely recognized for its powerful, scalable solutions that cater to large-scale enterprises seeking enhanced security, efficiency, and automation. With an infrastructure designed to optimize IT operations, Adaptiva addresses the needs of dynamic environments, delivering innovative features that support business growth and operational excellence. These capabilities make Adaptiva a preferred choice for organizations looking to streamline endpoint management.

What features make Adaptiva stand out?

P2P Content Delivery: Efficiently delivers large content across networks without server overload.
Automated Patch Management: Ensures timely and accurate updates to protect endpoints.
Scalable Architecture: Maintains performance by accommodating growing organizational demands.
Advanced Security Protocols: Protects sensitive data with state-of-the-art security measures.

What benefits should users focus on in reviews?

Improved Operational Efficiency: Reduces time and resources required for IT management.
Cost Reduction: Minimizes server maintenance with peer-to-peer technologies.
Enhanced Security: Provides reliable protection against vulnerabilities.
Increased Scalability: Adapts to growing needs without compromising functionality.

In industries like healthcare and financial services, Adaptiva is particularly beneficial due to its ability to support highly regulated environments. The platform offers significant enhancements in data protection and compliance management, resulting in secure operations and streamlined processes that adhere to strict industry standards, ensuring reliable and efficient service delivery.

Adaptiva

Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager combines a powerful vulnerability database with cloud-based deployment, facilitating mobile and OS management while enhancing security.

The platform features efficient patch management, remote control, and data access via mobile devices. Its unified console supports asset tracking across Windows, Mac, and Android, improving security patching processes. With inventory management, low-code workflow builders, built-in compliance, and an appealing UI, it manages thousands of devices, though it requires improvements in mobile onboarding, agent troubleshooting, and non-Windows patching. Some challenges exist with policy integration and IT tool integration, while comprehensive training is essential due to its wide range of functionalities.

What are the key features of Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager?

Unified Console: Streamlines management of mobile devices and operating systems.
Cloud-Based Deployment: Simplifies setup and reduces overhead.
Vulnerability Database: Enhances identification and patching of security risks.
Remote Control: Facilitates device management and data access remotely.
Low-Code Workflow Builders: Allows easy customization without extensive coding.

Which benefits should users expect when evaluating Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager?

Improved Security Compliance: Ensures alignment with security best practices.
Operational Efficiency: Automates patch deployment and asset tracking.
User Satisfaction: Gains from an intuitive and visually appealing interface.
Multi-OS Support: Manages Windows, Mac, and Android devices effectively.

Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager is implemented across industries for enhanced security patching, mobile device management, and data compliance. Companies utilize its features for managing personal and corporate data separately to prevent data leaks and breaches. The system enables efficient management of device fleets, though Mac management has noted limitations.

Ivanti

Sample Customers

Mitchells and Buzzers, Callaway

Information Not Available

Otkritie Bank, France T_l_visions, MBDA, 21st Century Oncology, Sealed Air Corporation, Granite School District, The Bunker, The MAC Services Group, Adams 12 Five Star Schools District, AlliedBarton Security Services, Mohawk Industries, Sun National Bank

Buyer's Guide

Unified Endpoint Management (UEM)

July 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, ManageEngine, Omnissa and others in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM). Updated: July 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

907,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) vendors.

We monitor all Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.