CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs WatchGuard Application Control comparison

"The most valuable feature is that their database is completely encrypted and protected with multiple layers."

"The tool is an endpoint management system. It monitors everything a standard user does and helps elevate privileges when necessary for advanced users. It keeps an auditable trail of all activities. Practically, it stops and blocks potentially hazardous user behavior, whether intentional or unintentional. Certain companies must use endpoint management software because of national or international rules or ISO norms."

"The most valuable feature of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is its ability to reset passwords every time that it is needed or periodically."

"What sets CyberArk apart is its continuous innovation, staying ahead of the competition."

"The solution's technical support is good."

"I am impressed with the product's seamless integration. The PAM wallet and enterprise password wallet are good also good."

"In terms of ROI, deploying CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager has secured the infrastructure, which saves money, time, and resources."

"The product is very flexible"

"The most valuable feature is the category control."

"It's user-friendly. And if you are using a WatchGuard device and you want to test that side of the software, it's quite easy to get the license to test it."

"I found several features valuable in WatchGuard Application Control such as the HTTP Proxy, DNSWatch, VPN, and HTTPS Content Inspection."

"Zero-trust and threat-hunting services are most valuable."

"It does the job of what it says it does. We set it to what we want it to block and then it blocks it."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is traffic management."

"Centralization is a crucial feature for me as it allows me to have all sites and customers accessible under a single click, not limited to just one."

"We have witnessed an ROI as it has helped with security measures."

"CyberArk should consider whitelisting important applications like PowerShell and DLL that are currently not allowed due to some malicious content."

"It is hard to deal with technical support if you are not certified."

"The product is expensive."

"The installation process is pretty difficult."

"My recommendation for improvement is to add functionality for when users request access to an application. There's a pop-up UI, but it's not very customizable. I suggest creating a UI where we can write scripts or use SDKs to enhance it. This could automatically create tickets in a system like ServiceNow when users request an application. If a manager approves, we could automatically push policies to those users."

"The solution's pricing could be better."

"The price of the solution should improve."

"The management of Privilege Access is not satisfactory."

"The time they take to classify an application once they find that it is unknown can be better."

"What could be improved in WatchGuard Application Control is its price. It could be cheaper. You always want the best price for any solution, but for security products, pricing is usually on the higher side."

"There should be more reports available on different subjects."

"The solution needs to improve the interface. I'm not able to easily find things using it."

"They could expand the amount of applications that are on the list, but it's pretty intensive anyway, so it's pretty good."

"There is no message displayed for the user on the desktop informing them that access to a web page has been blocked by Application Control."

"The control software is currently only available for Windows, which can be a little annoying for Linux users."

"The licensing can be a bit expensive."

"It is an expensive solution."

"I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten since the price can be too high for smaller businesses."

"Pricing depends on how many devices you use. Right now, on-premise, it costs us a little, but it's worth it. It seems like the cloud solution is much more expensive. We got this solution one year ago, and it's like we bought the solution, and now they are not going to support it on-premise anymore. We are in the implementation phase, and we missed this, and we already paid for the licenses. This is wasted time from my perspective, and CyberArk should be more customer-friendly."

"I feel that the price of the product is nominal. It must be around 10 to 15 USD per installation. I rate the product price an eight to nine out of ten, where one is high price, and ten is low price."

"The tool's pricing is reasonable for customers."

"The price of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is expensive. The solution is priced based on the number of accounts onboarded and the number of concurrent sessions. Everyone else is included in the price, such as support."

"Although I do not deal directly with the pricing, CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is costly compared to other solutions. However, it offers beneficial features."

"The professional services for one eight-hour day would be $1,800."

"Over the years, the costs have increased, especially since I cater to very small businesses."

"The licensing model for WatchGuard Application Control is based on the number of users. WatchGuard Application Control also has licensing models with several features."

"Its cost is okay. It is not too expensive, not too low. I would rate it a nine out of ten in terms of pricing."