Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CyberArk Secrets Management vs HashiCorp Vault comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Secrets Management
Ranking in Enterprise Password Managers
16th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
8.0
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Access Management (20th)
HashiCorp Vault
Ranking in Enterprise Password Managers
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

SP
Speedy secret retrieval with monitoring boosts efficiency but documentation needs enhancement
We occasionally experience incidents that delay password injection back into the script. Additionally, we've sometimes focused on vaulting instead of actively managing passwords, which is a concern that requires further exploration. I'm comparing the capabilities of Conjur and Secret Service with our existing products to ensure all our use cases are covered. Some features, like dynamic tokens for Azure and GCP, are already supported by other products but not yet by Conjur. Additionally, full support for GCP Secrets Manager and CyberArk needs confirmation. While Conjur has potential, implementation was complex and required professional services. Simplifying the setup process, particularly for Conjur Edge and Conjur Cloud, would be beneficial. Improving documentation, especially for daily tasks like creating safes, would make the product more user-friendly for those new to Conjur.
AKASHGUPTA3 - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to manage and maintain the password API but stability could be improved
I would advise doing a Proof of Concept first and then deciding accordingly because your use case might be simple. You can try out AWS Key Management or Azure Key Vault. They are different products. Do the POC and then decide what you need. Overall, I would rate the solution a six out of ten. No solution is a ten in my opinion.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It's vital for effectively managing and securing my credentials."
"Overall, I would rate it a nine out of ten."
"With CyberArk Secrets Management, we were able to resolve the automatic change of the passwords based on timelines. We were also able to retrieve the passwords in an encrypted format by utilizing the CyberArk platform, which was not provided to us by UiPath."
"CyberArk Secrets Management is a critical solution for strengthening our security posture."
"One of the most important features for us is the system's performance, particularly its speed of retrieving secrets."
"CyberArk's support team is knowledgeable and helpful, consistently responding on time."
"The most valuable feature is that it provides robust encryption for the secrets used in our APIs. We can add role-based permission to ensure security and prevent illegal access to our application."
"The automatic rotation of the password is the top feature."
"The product is free and easy to use. It is well documented with an easy implementation process."
"It is a good product to consider for companies who are looking to build on-premise or hybrid infrastructure."
"The feature I find most beneficial in HashiCorp Vault is the secret engine. It integrates smoothly with many applications, making it easy to set up and implement quickly. This allows you to test it easily and see good results rapidly. When you integrate an internal API or application, it quickly manages that application's secrets."
"It can still be configured by a separate team other than developers. That's why I think it's more secure."
"The most valuable feature of HashiCorp Vault is that it's an open source solution. Second, it's cloud agnostic, so it's very easy to maintain and control, which is why we prefer HashiCorp."
"The interface is very simple to navigate."
"This solution is easy to use and to integrate."
"It's stable. I would rate the stability a nine out of ten."
 

Cons

"If I want to add or streamline workflows, customization options are limited."
"We did not have a good experience with technical support because their numerous processes caused delays in engaging, leading to project delays or issues with production."
"Implementation was complex and required professional services."
"We occasionally experience incidents that delay password injection back into the script."
"Improvements for CyberArk Secrets Management include enhanced documentation with more use cases and step-by-step integration guides."
"The password search feature and integration between different vaults could be enhanced. For instance, when updating passwords in both lower and higher environment vaults, improvement is required in search and upgrade functions."
"CyberArk Secrets Management could be made suitable for small businesses by reducing its pricing. The pricing is very high for advanced features."
"Implementing it and ensuring seamless password rotations present challenges."
"We could use more documentation, primarily to do with integrations."
"In my opinion, HashiCorp Vault could improve its user interface. Right now, they don't offer much in terms of a graphical interface, which means you usually have to manage things manually through API calls. I think CyberArk has a better approach because it provides a UI that integrates features across all its components, making it easier, especially for new users or those from organizations with strict licensing policies."
"I would like to see better integration of HashiCorp Vault with SAP products."
"The product needs to improve its customization. It should be also more like easy to plug and play."
"The solution could be much easier to implement."
"A drawback for some clients who have to be PCI compliant is that they still need to use and subscribe to an HSM (Hardware Security Module) solution."
"The onboarding is a challenge. It should be more self-service, but it involves reviews and approvals."
"The solution's initial setup process is complicated."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is in the middle. It is neither very cheap nor very expensive, so I would place it in the middle."
"Its pricing is high. It is suitable for medium and large businesses but not for start-ups."
"CyberArk Secrets Management has a moderate pricing structure based on a per-tenant licensing model rather than a per-user account model like their PAM solution."
"I am using the open-source version of Vault and I would have to buy a license if I want to get support."
"It could do everything we wanted it to do and it is brilliant, but it is super pricey. To be fair to HashiCorp, we drove the price up with our requirements around resiliency. Because of the nature of our company, we don't really operate in the cloud."
"The product is expensive."
"In my case, the open-source version works well. It's advisable for small to medium-scale organizations, but for large-scale organizations, you should go with the enterprise version."
"The AWS version is much cheaper than HashiCorp Vault."
"The solution's cost is reasonable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Password Managers solutions are best for your needs.
842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Secrets Management?
CyberArk Secrets Management has a moderate pricing structure based on a per-tenant licensing model rather than a per-user account model like their PAM solution. This makes Conjur's cost comparative...
What needs improvement with CyberArk Secrets Management?
Improvements for CyberArk Secrets Management include enhanced documentation with more use cases and step-by-step integration guides. Thoroughly educating administrators on these aspects is crucial ...
What is your primary use case for CyberArk Secrets Management?
The primary use case for CyberArk Secrets Management is rotating credentials for all service accounts, especially those managed by Puppet for file deployment. This includes rotating AWS keys and cr...
Which is better - HashiCorp Vault or AWS Secrets Manager?
HashiCorp Vault was designed with your needs in mind. One of the features that makes this evident is its ability to work as both a cloud-agnostic and a multi-cloud solution. As a cloud-agnostic sol...
What do you like most about HashiCorp Vault?
The feature I find most beneficial in HashiCorp Vault is the secret engine. It integrates smoothly with many applications, making it easy to set up and implement quickly. This allows you to test it...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HashiCorp Vault?
If I were to set it up in AWS Secret Management, I would have to manage it, pay, and create secrets without being cloud agnostic. The advantage with Vault is that it is cloud agnostic. I can deploy...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Adobe, SAP Ariba, Citadel, Spaceflight, Cruise
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Secrets Management vs. HashiCorp Vault and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.