Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

HashiCorp Vault vs Keeper comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 16, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.1
Keeper provides secure, convenient password access, saving time and offering high ROI, with users reporting significant efficiency gains.
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.6
Keeper's customer service is praised for quick resolution, user-friendliness, though some note slower weekend responses and occasional limitations.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
HashiCorp Vault offers robust scalability, performing well on Kubernetes, with scalability ratings of seven to eight out of ten.
Sentiment score
8.4
Keeper is highly rated for scalability, supporting numerous records seamlessly, from small businesses to larger enterprises with minimal issues.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
HashiCorp Vault is stable with high ratings despite occasional issues, praised for machine communication but limited for regional scaling.
Sentiment score
8.5
Keeper is highly stable and reliable, with no crashes or data loss, trusted by personal and business users alike.
 

Room For Improvement

HashiCorp Vault struggles with cloud integration, documentation, costs, UI, support, automation, customization, stability, pricing, and plugin features.
Keeper users seek enhancements in usability, integration, organization, and features like syncing, API improvements, and offline access.
 

Setup Cost

HashiCorp Vault's enterprise edition offers valuable features but is costly, with some users finding the pricing model confusing.
Keeper provides tailored enterprise plans with discounts and recommendations, ensuring excellent value and protection against cyber threats.
 

Valuable Features

Consul offers seamless integration, robust encryption, and user-friendly APIs for secure, cloud-agnostic management with easy CI/CD expansion.
Keeper is praised for robust security, multi-device accessibility, user-friendly interface, and advanced features enhancing usability and protection.
 

Categories and Ranking

HashiCorp Vault
Ranking in Enterprise Password Managers
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Keeper
Ranking in Enterprise Password Managers
13th
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Enterprise Password Managers category, the mindshare of HashiCorp Vault is 14.9%, down from 17.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Keeper is 3.9%, down from 4.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Password Managers
 

Featured Reviews

KishoreKumar1 - PeerSpot reviewer
Useful for machine-to-machine communication and has secret engine feature
The feature I find most beneficial in HashiCorp Vault is the secret engine. It integrates smoothly with many applications, making it easy to set up and implement quickly. This allows you to test it easily and see good results rapidly. When you integrate an internal API or application, it quickly manages that application's secrets. The access management feature in HashiCorp is great, especially if you are considering situations where users are getting onboarded. They can manage their passwords themselves, and it integrates well with Active Directory or any other directory services. This is particularly useful for user management and applications that communicate with each other without human intervention.
Parwiz ElmJo - PeerSpot reviewer
It's an inexpensive, scalable solution that has improved our security
We use Keeper to store passwords We previously kept our passwords in an Excel file. Using Keeper makes us more secure.  Keeper has strong security features.  The password rotation feature could be improved. I have used Keeper for three years. I rate Keeper eight out of 10 for stability.  I…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Password Managers solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
20%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - HashiCorp Vault or AWS Secrets Manager?
HashiCorp Vault was designed with your needs in mind. One of the features that makes this evident is its ability to work as both a cloud-agnostic and a multi-cloud solution. As a cloud-agnostic sol...
What do you like most about HashiCorp Vault?
The feature I find most beneficial in HashiCorp Vault is the secret engine. It integrates smoothly with many applications, making it easy to set up and implement quickly. This allows you to test it...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HashiCorp Vault?
The enterprise version would require considering factors like the level of support needed, the amount of secret data being stored, and replication needs. But in my case, the open-source version wor...
What do you like most about Keeper?
I like the tool's keyword editor and SSO.
What needs improvement with Keeper?
Keeper does not provide password management for mobile apps.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Keeper Security
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Adobe, SAP Ariba, Citadel, Spaceflight, Cruise
At&t, Wells Fargo, Disney, GM, Chase, Honeywell, Samsung, Dow
Find out what your peers are saying about HashiCorp Vault vs. Keeper and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.