Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cynet vs ThreatLocker Protect comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.1
Cynet provides responsive 24/7 support, praised for SOC assistance but needs improvement in non-technical inquiries and local presence.
Sentiment score
8.8
ThreatLocker's support is praised for quick responses, knowledgeable staff, efficient issue resolution, and outstanding customer service.
Their SOC side support, when a threat is detected, is excellent.
ThreatLocker's technical support process could be streamlined by reducing the number of steps required to reach a human agent.
It could be better, especially with response times.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
5.5
Improvements needed in mobile support, technical response, customization, reporting, usability, integrations, and feature enhancements like AI detection.
Sentiment score
5.7
ThreatLocker Protect needs flexible training, UI improvements, better integration, refined learning, and antivirus features for enhanced security and usability.
There should be more options than deploying solely through group policy, as the assumption that GPO is working isn’t always the case.
Having a DLP feature would also add value.
This is problematic when immediate attention is needed.
Comprehensive 24-hour log monitoring is a valuable enhancement for both business and enterprise-level users.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
Cynet provides seamless scalability and compatibility for varied company sizes, ensuring efficient performance across diverse operating systems and environments.
Sentiment score
8.3
ThreatLocker Protect efficiently scales across various organization sizes, handling thousands of endpoints with ease and adaptability.
Cynet is very scalable.
It is scalable to an extent, depending on where it is used.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
6.6
Cynet offers competitive pricing with flexible subscription options, integrating multiple features in one solution, including optional support costs.
Sentiment score
6.4
Enterprise buyers find ThreatLocker Protect's pricing reasonable and flexible, offering value, customization, integration, and strategic budget benefits.
I think the pricing of Cynet is fair and one of the better options in the market.
The pricing is reasonable and normal.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.6
Cynet is praised for its stability, reliability, and minimal issues, achieving high user ratings despite minor initial false positives.
Sentiment score
6.8
ThreatLocker Protect is stable, with minor issues resolved quickly, ensuring high uptime similar to Microsoft's standards.
Stability can be improved as there are times it goes down or requires management to adjust policies.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.4
Cynet excels with user-friendly interface, strong threat detection, seamless integration, and comprehensive features for security and scalability.
Sentiment score
8.5
ThreatLocker Protect ensures efficient mobile access and security with application control, zero-trust, and comprehensive user activity visibility.
The most effective features of Cynet are its ransomware protection and lateral movement deception.
The valuable aspects of Cynet are its EDR and XDR components, which are available at a reasonable price point.
ThreatLocker's most valuable feature is its scanning capability, which executes all types of executable files.
 

Categories and Ranking

Cynet
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
17th
Ranking in Ransomware Protection
5th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (10th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (5th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (14th), Threat Deception Platforms (3rd), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (4th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (10th)
ThreatLocker Protect
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
12th
Ranking in Ransomware Protection
6th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
Network Access Control (NAC) (5th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (8th), Application Control (4th), ZTNA (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cynet is 1.1%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ThreatLocker Protect is 0.7%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Ch342 - PeerSpot reviewer
Continuously improving and comes with automated response and SIEM/SOC
This is the third company I've worked with, and I've brought them in as a provider. For me, it's as good as it gets. Nobody likes to talk about tens, but they have a better record of detection than CrowdStrike, and they didn't shut down the world like CrowdStrike. If you really dig down into it, who are the founders of the companies? On the one hand, you have a guy who used to be a consultant, I believe, and we know they're full of it. On the other hand, you got a guy who hacked into an Israeli bank, I think, when he was about 15 years old. They eventually hired him, and now this is his third startup. So, when you look at it that way, there's no comparison.
Roy Richardson - PeerSpot reviewer
Integration is simple, deployment is straightforward, and extensive well-written documentation is available online
We use ThreatLocker's Allowlisting to whitelist specific applications and prevent unauthorized software from running. We utilize Ringfencing to establish guardrails around implementations, ensuring that applications operate within defined boundaries. We leverage network access control to granularly control interactions between computer systems and servers. This enables us to restrict communication between specific applications, even within a locked-down environment. We employ storage control to impose additional security measures on data storage. This includes controlling access to network shares, network files, and folders, as well as USB storage devices. We can whitelist specific devices based on their serial numbers or allow access based on predefined conditions. We rely on ThreatLocker's Cyber Hero support, which provides exceptional assistance and responsiveness. At any time, we can initiate a chat session and receive immediate support. If the issue requires escalation, it is promptly handled. Cyber Hero support also plays a crucial role in vetting application updates. When a user attempts to install or update an application, and the update has not been approved from a security standpoint, it is blocked by ThreatLocker. A notification is presented to the user, informing them of the block and providing an option to justify the application's need. These requests are then reviewed by ThreatLocker's Cyber Hero support team, who evaluate them against our security criteria and make an informed decision to allow or deny the application. We utilize ThreatLocker's elevated control feature for applications that require administrator-level access. We avoid granting full administrative privileges to end users, as this elevates the risk of compromise if the device is infiltrated. Instead, elevated control allows us to precisely define the execution conditions for specific applications, such as QuickBooks updates. By verifying the application's signature and certificate, we can enable the update to run with administrative privileges while restricting the user's overall administrative access. Integrating ThreatLocker with other products is simple and only requires a few clicks. ThreatLocker's deployment is also very straightforward. The company provides extensive and well-written online documentation, which is continuously being improved. They also offer a variety of training resources, including university courses, training videos, webinars, and conferences. I have no complaints about the level of support and knowledge transfer provided by the company. ThreatLocker is also developing a new reporting tool, which I had the opportunity to beta test. The company has also been showcasing the new reporting tool at conferences. The new reporting tool provides a level of detail that is unmatched by any other product on the market.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Computer Software Company
37%
Retailer
8%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Government
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

When evaluating User Activity Monitoring, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
The support team that stands behind the detection and response. Is there adequate expertise and are they behind you 24x7x365? Cynet CyOps has been there for us.
What do you like most about Cynet?
In terms of incident response, Cynet can contain attacks, offer a trial period to customers, and uninstall if not continued. The most valuable aspect is its integration capabilities, covering endpo...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cynet?
I think the pricing of Cynet is fair and one of the better options in the market. It's right in the middle compared to other solutions.
What do you like most about ThreatLocker Allowlisting?
The interface is clean and well-organized, making it simple to navigate and find what we need.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ThreatLocker Allowlisting?
I handle the technical aspects, while my manager deals with pricing. Although the pricing seems good, there have been inconsistencies in contract negotiations. What we are told during calls sometim...
What needs improvement with ThreatLocker Allowlisting?
ThreatLocker would benefit from incorporating an antivirus feature or comprehensive 24-hour log monitoring, a valuable enhancement for both business and enterprise-level users.
 

Also Known As

No data available
ThreatLocker Allowlisting, ThreatLocker Network Control, ThreatLocker Ringfencing
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Meuhedet, East Boston Neighborhood Health Center
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Cynet vs. ThreatLocker Protect and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.
823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.