Cynet and ThreatLocker compete in the cybersecurity solutions market, each offering a unique set of functionalities for network protection and threat prevention. Based on the comparisons, Cynet appears to have an advantage in real-time monitoring and comprehensive network visibility, while ThreatLocker provides superior application control and a user-friendly approval process.
Features: Cynet integrates antivirus, user behavior analysis, network behavior analytics, and automated threat remediation into a single package. It provides autonomous threat blocking and robust 24/7 SOC support, standing out with its extensive real-time monitoring capabilities. ThreatLocker emphasizes application control, ring-fencing, and privilege elevation to ensure precise control over software activity. It includes a seamless approval process and strong customer support, making it a practical solution for organizations focusing on zero trust and strict application control.
Room for Improvement: Cynet users have identified a need for better mobile device support, expanded third-party integration options, and enhanced reporting capabilities, with specific criticisms on Android support and managing false positives. ThreatLocker's training could be more flexible, and users have noted the need for improved PSA integration and reporting tools, along with easier allowlisting management processes to increase operational efficiency.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cynet supports both hybrid and public cloud deployment models while being praised for its competent 24/7 SOC services, despite needing better geographic support due to user demand. ThreatLocker provides flexible cloud deployment options, and users generally find its customer service prompt and responsive, often appreciating it slightly more than Cynet's support. Both solutions deliver robust technical support and deployment versatility.
Pricing and ROI: Cynet is competitively priced, offering diverse functionalities under flexible yearly or monthly licensing plans, contributing positively to user-reported ROI. ThreatLocker is regarded as fairly priced for its specific security features, with customers valuing its customization potential despite additional costs for certain modules. Both products have shown positive ROI for clients, though detailed financial data remains limited.
The measurable benefits of using ThreatLocker include ensuring real-time protection of organizational resources and maintaining user authentication and protection levels to reduce risks.
Their SOC side support, when a threat is detected, is excellent.
ThreatLocker's technical support process could be streamlined by reducing the number of steps required to reach a human agent.
It could be better, especially with response times.
Cynet is very scalable.
It is scalable to an extent, depending on where it is used.
Stability can be improved as there are times it goes down or requires management to adjust policies.
There should be more options than deploying solely through group policy, as the assumption that GPO is working isn’t always the case.
Having a DLP feature would also add value.
This is problematic when immediate attention is needed.
Comprehensive 24-hour log monitoring is a valuable enhancement for both business and enterprise-level users.
I think the pricing of Cynet is fair and one of the better options in the market.
The pricing is reasonable and normal.
The most effective features of Cynet are its ransomware protection and lateral movement deception.
The valuable aspects of Cynet are its EDR and XDR components, which are available at a reasonable price point.
ThreatLocker's most valuable feature is its scanning capability, which executes all types of executable files.
Cynet provides endpoint protection, threat detection, and response. It helps companies secure files, devices, and networks from zero-day threats, reducing the need for extensive support staff through its continuous monitoring, antivirus, and anti-malware functionalities.
Cynet offers comprehensive security features, including EDR, NGAV, and MDR, suitable for cloud, on-premises, and hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its 24/7 SOC services, seamless integration with other cybersecurity systems, and intuitive graphical interface. Features like autonomous malware blocking, scalability, detailed network user behavior analysis, and rapid policy deployment ensure robust security operations.
What are Cynet's most valuable features?Cynet is implemented across industries like finance, healthcare, and retail due to its comprehensive cybersecurity capabilities. Organizations in these sectors benefit from detailed network user behavior analysis, data aggregation, automation, and incident response, ensuring robust protection for critical infrastructure and sensitive data.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform offers robust endpoint security through application control and allowlisting, safeguarding servers and workstations from unauthorized software execution.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform provides extensive application control with features like ring-fencing and selective elevation, ensuring meticulous execution management. Offering learning mode and extensive support, it integrates threat detection and activity monitoring to enhance compliance, reduce costs, and bolster cybersecurity through alerts and approvals. Despite its strengths, there are areas for improvement in training flexibility, policy updates, and interface enhancements, along with challenges in handling non-digitally signed software. Deployed across environments, it works well with existing cybersecurity instruments for real-time threat prevention.
What are the top features of ThreatLocker?ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is widely implemented to safeguard IT infrastructures against unauthorized access and application use. In sectors where data security is paramount, this platform enables users to prevent unauthorized software installations and control device applications, ensuring real-time threat prevention and compliance with industry regulations.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.