Cynet and ThreatLocker compete in the cybersecurity solutions market, each offering a unique set of functionalities for network protection and threat prevention. Based on the comparisons, Cynet appears to have an advantage in real-time monitoring and comprehensive network visibility, while ThreatLocker provides superior application control and a user-friendly approval process.
Features: Cynet integrates antivirus, user behavior analysis, network behavior analytics, and automated threat remediation into a single package. It provides autonomous threat blocking and robust 24/7 SOC support, standing out with its extensive real-time monitoring capabilities. ThreatLocker emphasizes application control, ring-fencing, and privilege elevation to ensure precise control over software activity. It includes a seamless approval process and strong customer support, making it a practical solution for organizations focusing on zero trust and strict application control.
Room for Improvement: Cynet users have identified a need for better mobile device support, expanded third-party integration options, and enhanced reporting capabilities, with specific criticisms on Android support and managing false positives. ThreatLocker's training could be more flexible, and users have noted the need for improved PSA integration and reporting tools, along with easier allowlisting management processes to increase operational efficiency.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cynet supports both hybrid and public cloud deployment models while being praised for its competent 24/7 SOC services, despite needing better geographic support due to user demand. ThreatLocker provides flexible cloud deployment options, and users generally find its customer service prompt and responsive, often appreciating it slightly more than Cynet's support. Both solutions deliver robust technical support and deployment versatility.
Pricing and ROI: Cynet is competitively priced, offering diverse functionalities under flexible yearly or monthly licensing plans, contributing positively to user-reported ROI. ThreatLocker is regarded as fairly priced for its specific security features, with customers valuing its customization potential despite additional costs for certain modules. Both products have shown positive ROI for clients, though detailed financial data remains limited.
If something were to happen without ThreatLocker, the cost would be huge, and thus, having it is definitely worth it.
The main return on investment is peace of mind, knowing that with ThreatLocker on any endpoint, it will almost always block all malicious code or exploits, even zero-day exploits.
It keeps malware, Trojans, and ransomware at bay.
Their SOC side support, when a threat is detected, is excellent.
Their technical support can be improved in terms of speed when opening a ticket.
I was very satisfied with their technical support.
They have been very responsive, helpful, and knowledgeable.
I would rate their customer support a ten out of ten.
Their support is world-class.
The solution is highly scalable.
Cynet is very scalable.
I started off with just the servers, and within a month and a half, I set up the entire company with ThreatLocker.
It seems to primarily operate on the endpoints rather than at a central location pushing out policies.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for scalability.
For five years, we have not had a problem.
Once deployed, it downloads the policies locally, so even if the computer doesn't have internet, it doesn't matter.
They've worked through a lot of their issues and are pretty responsive in fixing them.
There should be more options than deploying solely through group policy, as the assumption that GPO is working isn’t always the case.
Having a DLP feature would also add value.
Integration with local Active Directory, not only Azure AD, is a must.
This is problematic when immediate attention is needed.
Comprehensive 24-hour log monitoring is a valuable enhancement for both business and enterprise-level users.
The company should strive to stay ahead of all the developments happening externally.
I think the pricing of Cynet is fair and one of the better options in the market.
After conversations with other partners, it became clear we underpriced it initially, which caused most of our issues.
We are moving towards the Unified solution, where they basically bundle everything together, providing us better stability with the ability to bring in new product offerings without having to go back to the customer and say, 'This is going to cost you.'
I had a really good deal at the time, and it continues to be cost-effective.
The valuable aspects of Cynet are its EDR and XDR components, which are available at a reasonable price point.
The most effective features of Cynet are its ransomware protection and lateral movement deception.
The SOAR function, deception, and forensics are very useful.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform's ability to block access to unauthorized applications has been excellent.
It protects our customers.
The major benefit is fewer breaches overall, as nothing can be run without prior approval. This helps my company protect its data and secure itself effectively.
Cynet provides endpoint protection, threat detection, and response. It helps companies secure files, devices, and networks from zero-day threats, reducing the need for extensive support staff through its continuous monitoring, antivirus, and anti-malware functionalities.
Cynet offers comprehensive security features, including EDR, NGAV, and MDR, suitable for cloud, on-premises, and hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its 24/7 SOC services, seamless integration with other cybersecurity systems, and intuitive graphical interface. Features like autonomous malware blocking, scalability, detailed network user behavior analysis, and rapid policy deployment ensure robust security operations.
What are Cynet's most valuable features?Cynet is implemented across industries like finance, healthcare, and retail due to its comprehensive cybersecurity capabilities. Organizations in these sectors benefit from detailed network user behavior analysis, data aggregation, automation, and incident response, ensuring robust protection for critical infrastructure and sensitive data.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform offers robust endpoint security through application control and allowlisting, safeguarding servers and workstations from unauthorized software execution.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform provides extensive application control with features like ring-fencing and selective elevation, ensuring meticulous execution management. Offering learning mode and extensive support, it integrates threat detection and activity monitoring to enhance compliance, reduce costs, and bolster cybersecurity through alerts and approvals. Despite its strengths, there are areas for improvement in training flexibility, policy updates, and interface enhancements, along with challenges in handling non-digitally signed software. Deployed across environments, it works well with existing cybersecurity instruments for real-time threat prevention.
What are the top features of ThreatLocker?ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is widely implemented to safeguard IT infrastructures against unauthorized access and application use. In sectors where data security is paramount, this platform enables users to prevent unauthorized software installations and control device applications, ensuring real-time threat prevention and compliance with industry regulations.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
