Cynet and Trellix Active Response compete in the cybersecurity solutions category. Based on user reviews, Trellix Active Response seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced features despite its higher price.
Features: Cynet users highlight valuable features such as automated threat detection and response, simplified setup, and integration capabilities. Trellix Active Response is noted for its comprehensive threat intelligence, detailed analytics, and advanced threat hunting tools. Trellix’s advanced features surpass Cynet, providing a more robust security solution.
Room for Improvement: Cynet requires enhancements in reporting capabilities, navigation intuitiveness, and user interface. Trellix Active Response needs improvements in reducing false positives, streamlining its complexity, and enhancing user experience. Trellix faces challenges with complexity that may impact user experience more significantly.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cynet has a straightforward deployment model with significant praise for its responsive customer service. Trellix Active Response offers a more complex deployment process but compensates with extensive training and support resources. Cynet is preferred for ease of deployment, while Trellix’s customer service is robust but might be more resource-intensive.
Pricing and ROI: Cynet provides a cost-effective solution with a favorable setup cost and positive ROI feedback. Trellix Active Response, despite its higher setup cost, justifies the investment through its comprehensive feature set and strong ROI. Cynet is the more budget-friendly option, whereas Trellix offers superior long-term value.
While we haven't yet quantified the financial benefits, we recognize that there has been a return on investment, particularly with operational efficiencies provided by the alerts.
Their SOC side support, when a threat is detected, is excellent.
I was very satisfied with their technical support.
Their technical support can be improved in terms of speed when opening a ticket.
The solution is highly scalable.
Cynet is very scalable.
The scalability of Active Response is satisfactory.
There should be more options than deploying solely through group policy, as the assumption that GPO is working isn’t always the case.
Integration with local Active Directory, not only Azure AD, is a must.
Having a DLP feature would also add value.
We would like Trellix to optimize the technology for these systems similarly to how it is deployed for normal endpoints.
I think the pricing of Cynet is fair and one of the better options in the market.
Cynet is more expensive compared to CrowdStrike, which is why we switched.
Based on our evaluations, Trellix Active Response's pricing was the most feasible from a cost perspective.
The valuable aspects of Cynet are its EDR and XDR components, which are available at a reasonable price point.
The SOAR function, deception, and forensics are very useful.
The most effective features of Cynet are its ransomware protection and lateral movement deception.
They notify us immediately of any vulnerabilities on the endpoints, allowing us to deploy a response quickly.
Cynet provides endpoint protection, threat detection, and response. It helps companies secure files, devices, and networks from zero-day threats, reducing the need for extensive support staff through its continuous monitoring, antivirus, and anti-malware functionalities.
Cynet offers comprehensive security features, including EDR, NGAV, and MDR, suitable for cloud, on-premises, and hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its 24/7 SOC services, seamless integration with other cybersecurity systems, and intuitive graphical interface. Features like autonomous malware blocking, scalability, detailed network user behavior analysis, and rapid policy deployment ensure robust security operations.
What are Cynet's most valuable features?Cynet is implemented across industries like finance, healthcare, and retail due to its comprehensive cybersecurity capabilities. Organizations in these sectors benefit from detailed network user behavior analysis, data aggregation, automation, and incident response, ensuring robust protection for critical infrastructure and sensitive data.
Continuous Visibility into Your Endpoints:
Capture and monitor events, files, host flows, process objects, context, and system state changes that may be indicators of attack or dormant attack components.
Identify and Remediate Breaches Faster:
Access tools you need to quickly correct security issues. Send intelligence to analytics, operations, and forensic teams.
Target Critical Threats:
Get preconfigured and customizable actions when triggered, so you can target and eliminate threats.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
