Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Trellix Active Response vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Trellix Active Response boasts knowledgeable and responsive support, offering prompt issue resolution, clear explanations, and proactive communication.
Sentiment score
10.0
Trellix EDR support varies from excellent to inadequate, with issues in response times, knowledge, language barriers, and recent merger impacts.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Trellix Active Response needs better customization, faster processing, improved integration, comprehensive documentation, intuitive setup, and enhanced customer support.
Sentiment score
4.7
Trellix EDR needs performance improvements, a modern dashboard, enhanced policy enforcement, better macOS compatibility, and improved integration and detection capabilities.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Trellix Active Response is scalable, integrates easily, handles large data seamlessly, and maintains performance and security with minimal latency.
Sentiment score
7.5
Trellix EDR is scalable, cloud-based, and well-suited for various business sizes, despite occasional performance concerns from users.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Trellix Active Response is praised for reliability, efficient data handling, quick threat detection, adaptability, and stability with minimal downtime.
Sentiment score
7.6
Trellix EDR is highly stable, with performance issues on older Windows versions resolved in recent updates, requiring good internet connectivity.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Trellix Active Response is praised for robust threat detection, real-time incident response, easy integration, and comprehensive reporting features.
Sentiment score
8.0
The tool is praised for advanced threat protection, ease of use, real-time monitoring, scalability, and comprehensive investigative capabilities.
 

Categories and Ranking

Trellix Active Response
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
66th
Average Rating
6.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Trellix Endpoint Detection ...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
23rd
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Trellix Active Response is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is 0.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
 

Featured Reviews

LW
Lighter with good stability and pretty good technical support
It's still not lightweight enough and not as light as they claim to be with the McAfee area of a next-gen AV. They can do some improvements along that line. There needs to be some improvement around the white-listing or black-listing. The product could improve aspects around the removal of blacklisted applications, et cetera. This was an exercise to centralize the AV cell, and that's how we ended up upgrading. The truth, however, is that I was really looking for something much more advanced with user behavior analytics and some AI features that the other competitor's next-gen AV does offer. It is okay for what it's doing now, however, it's not the ultimate software. There are some components on the cloud that should also reside in the on-prem deployment models but don't. They should ensure they are doing parallel development for cloud and on-prem when they are doing R&D.
Juan Muriel - PeerSpot reviewer
Completely automated, affordable, and provides good technical functionalities
The antivirus and DLP features are valuable. Now, we have a campaign to encrypt all the drives of the company. We have a solution for network access control from Fortinet. When Trellix detects some threats, the device is isolated in a quarantine zone for examination. We integrate Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response with other solutions to perform such isolations. We also use products for log monitoring and correlation and create use cases for automatic response.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
24%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Energy/Utilities Company
7%
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Government
11%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?
Pricing is a problem in South Africa. It could be cheaper here. The rand-to-dollar exchange rate makes it expensive for us. A 25 dollar endpoint cost becomes quite significant when converted to rand.
What needs improvement with McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?
When it comes to some unknown fileless attacks, the tool is not able to detect them properly, making it an area where improvements are required. The tool's support needs to improve in the areas of ...
 

Also Known As

McAfee Active Response
McAfee MVISION EDR, MVISION EDR, MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Liquor Control Board of Ontario
Sutherland Global Services
Find out what your peers are saying about Trellix Active Response vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.