Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Trellix Endpoint Detection ...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
24th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Trellix Endpoint Security (...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
17th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
53
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (24th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is 2.1%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
 

Featured Reviews

Juan Muriel - PeerSpot reviewer
Completely automated, affordable, and provides good technical functionalities
The antivirus and DLP features are valuable. Now, we have a campaign to encrypt all the drives of the company. We have a solution for network access control from Fortinet. When Trellix detects some threats, the device is isolated in a quarantine zone for examination. We integrate Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response with other solutions to perform such isolations. We also use products for log monitoring and correlation and create use cases for automatic response.
Venugopal Potumudi - PeerSpot reviewer
Reliable with good independent modules and a straightforward setup
I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. Having used Trend Micro as well, I would rate Trend Micro higher. However, I would still choose this product as a second option. When we recommend a product, we would recommend something based on the fit of the product and customer requirements. We worked with Defender, we worked with Trend Micro, and we worked with McAfee. All of them almost overlap in multiple use cases. That said, we do see the customer IT strategy and where they're going, and they are adopting Azure more. We know there are certain limitations in their landscape where there may be some old legacy systems, and in that case, then we would either switch back to McAfee or Trend Micro instead of Defender.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable features of the solution are the ability to isolate or quarantine devices and block or detect Ransomware and other well-known tools that are used to exploit vulnerabilities on devices."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its area for threat detection."
"The dashboard makes it easier and more effective to analyze data."
"Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) offers endpoint protection and helps collect information while also allowing users to investigate malicious files in an IT environment...It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"It relies on external systems for detection and then asks the endpoint to handle blocking. However, the most crucial feature is its investigative capabilities. With real-time search and other functionalities, it enables comprehensive detection and response."
"The biggest strength of the solution is that it's an integrated product that includes EDR and antivirus."
"It is a scalable solution and very easy to use."
"The most useful features are behavior monitoring, DLP, and access control. The automation has gotten much better in the last two years than when it was McAfee. It works better now and integrates more smoothly."
"MVISION Endpoint is so much easier and so much simpler for the lay security personnel to handle."
"Provides protection against threats."
"The response part of EDR was most valuable. We used that to separate the endpoint from the network. We utilized the solution during the instant response. We were also utilizing advanced malware detection capabilities, but we benefited the most from its help with the response."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is its simplicity."
"The technical support services are good."
"The stability has been great."
"The most valuable network security feature is the network sandbox solution. This sandbox feature works on traffic flow."
"The setup is not that complex. It takes five to ten minutes to set up."
 

Cons

"For Spanish users, it is necessary to have a knowledge base specifically designed for them, which is currently not available."
"The graphical view for nodes must be increased."
"One of the issues about the product stems from the failure to work on its administrative scalability. The aforementioned area can be considered for improvement."
"Trellix needs to focus on gaining traction with partners and building trust among users."
"The main drawbacks are resources and processing time, as it consumes a lot of CPU and RAM."
"Trellix does not support Linux and Mac."
"The solution's downside stems from the fact that Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and McAfee MVISION Endpoint are not combined into a single solution, so from an improvement perspective, they need to be combined into a single solution."
"The CPU utilization of the product is quite high compared to its competitors."
"They have something called Managed Detection and Response. They get intel from their customers, and that intel is shared with the rest of FireEye's customers. I want to subscribe to their intel, but that is not available to us."
"It is a bit technical. The user interface has some significant limitations, mainly when using HIPS on the server side, to protect files from being changed or deleted by hackers, users, or administrators."
"The Linux support is very poor. I use base detection. Currently, they are providing malware protection and logon track features in Windows and Mac. These features aren't available in Linux. It will be helpful to extend these capabilities to Linux. We would also like assets grouping and device lock protection features, which are included in their roadmap."
"The reports need more development. They need more details on the reports and more details taking the executive view into consideration."
"Intrusion detection and intervention seem to be falling behind the competition."
"We'd like better UI on the management screen."
"Impacts performance of the servers quite negatively."
"Upgrading to new versions isn't easy and it can take a long time. Also, other solutions' tamper protection features are better than FireEye's. Clients should have access to our local information, but they shouldn't change settings on the system itself."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Speaking about the price, you must use the product to find the product's cost for you."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is low and ten is high, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."
"The cost is okay, compared to other products."
"McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is reasonable in terms of cost. It's a tool my company has been using for a few years now. It costs $25,000 to $30,000 for six hundred users."
"The pricing is always high."
"The licensing costs attached to the solution are very easy to manage. There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs."
"Pricing is a problem in South Africa. It could be cheaper here. The rand-to-dollar exchange rate makes it expensive for us. A 25 dollar endpoint cost becomes quite significant when converted to rand."
"The product’s pricing is reasonable."
"We had a discount when purchasing the solution because of the size of our company and we are happy with the price."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"They should reduce the cost or make it free, open-source software."
"Licensing fees are paid yearly."
"Pricing for McAfee MVISION Endpoint is not very good, and I would rate its cost three out of five, though I won't be able to mention how much its actual price is."
"There's a subscription on a yearly basis. It's not that expensive; it's quite affordable."
"The product pricing is high."
"It was an annual fee. There was just one overall fee."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
10%
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
11%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?
Pricing is a problem in South Africa. It could be cheaper here. The rand-to-dollar exchange rate makes it expensive for us. A 25 dollar endpoint cost becomes quite significant when converted to rand.
What needs improvement with McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?
When it comes to some unknown fileless attacks, the tool is not able to detect them properly, making it an area where improvements are required. The tool's support needs to improve in the areas of ...
How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...
What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint?
The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.
 

Also Known As

McAfee MVISION EDR, MVISION EDR, MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response
McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Sutherland Global Services
Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation
Find out what your peers are saying about Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.